John Logue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

John Logue

Description:

Areas of Equipoise in Radiation Management of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer ... Dose Escalation affects the outcome in Prostate Cancer. Zelefsky et al IJROBP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: stephen400
Category:
Tags: john | logue

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: John Logue


1
Radiotherapy
  • John Logue

2
Radiation Therapy in Locally AdvancedProstate
cancer
  • John Logue
  • Department of Clinical Oncology
  • Christie Hospital
  • Manchester

3
Necessity of Radiotherapyin Prostate Cancer
Ideal
Benefit
Stage
4
Areas of Equipoise in Radiation Management of
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
  • Radiation dose/ fractionation
  • Radiation Technique
  • Use Duration of Hormonal therapy
  • Adjuvant systemic therapy

5
Is More always better?
  • Dose Escalation

6
Dose Escalation affects the outcome in Prostate
CancerZelefsky et al IJROBP 413,491, 1998
  • Is local control improved by increasing the dose?
    YES

7
Phase III Dose Escalation studies
  • Dutch 70 vs 76 Gy Completed
  • MRC RT01 64 vs 74Gy NAHT completed
  • PROG 95-09 70.2GyE vs 79.2GyE
  • Pollack Study 70 vs 78 Gy
  • Pollack et al J Clin Oncol 2000 18 3904-3911

8
PSA lt 10
PSA gt10
Pollack et al J Clin Oncol 2000 18 3904-3911
9
3D CRT Dose Escalation
Bladder
PTV
Rectum
CTV
Prostate seminal vesicles
10
MDAH TrialToxicityGrade 2 , 3 Rectal Toxicity
  • Rectal Volume-70Gy

Dose
11
IMRT Widening the Therapeutic Ratio
12
Rectal doses for 57Gy plans
.
4 Field CRT
IMRT
13
Is More always better?
  • Fractionation

14
3DCRT Prostate ExperienceIJROBP 575, 1254-9,
2003
  • 705 men with prostate cancer
  • Treated between 1995-98
  • Mean age 68 years (range 49-84)
  • T1-4, N0, M0
  • 4 field conformal radiotherapy
  • PTV-prostate plus all/base of the seminal
    vesicles dependent on risk criteria with a 1cm
    margin
  • No neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy
  • 50Gy in 16 fractions over 22 days
  • Median follow up 48 months (range 1- 82)
  • Failure by ASTRO Consensus

15
Disease Characteristics
  • Number ()
  • T1 125 (18)
  • T2 365 (52)
  • T3/4 215 (30)
  • Gleason 2-6 463 (66)
  • Gleason 7-10 242 (34)
  • PSA lt 10 291 (41)
  • 10 to lt 20 228 (32)
  • gt20 186 (26)

Median pre treatment PSA 13ng/ml (0.6-270).
16
Results
  • Number bNED
  • Good Prognosis 181 82
  • (stage T1/2, PSA lt10ng/ml
  • Gleason score lt7)
  • Intermediate Prognosis 247 56
  • (one raised value)
  • Poor Prognosis 277 39
  • (2 or more raised values)

17
Comparison Of Results 5Year Actuarial PSA RFS
Liebel et al Sem Oncol 2003 305
18
Equivalent Doses ?
  • a/ß ratio 1.5  
  • 50Gy/16 154
  • 66Gy/33 154
  • 70.2/ 39 154
  •  
  •  

19
Dose Escalation Strategies
20
Hypofractionated Dose escalation utilising IMRT
in Prostate cancer ( HIPRO)
  • Phase II study
  • May 2002 December 2003
  • 57Gy
  • 30 patients May-Dec 2002
  • Median follow up 21 months (19-26)
  • 9 Grade I Rectal toxicity
  • 60Gy December 2003
  • Median Follow up 11 months (8-15)

21
HYPOFRACTIONATED DOSE ESCALATION FOR PROSTATE
CANCER (HIPRO)
  • ELIGIBILITY
  • T2b-T3 N0, M0 carcinoma of prostate
  • Gleason score gt6
  • PSAgt 10 ng/ml
  • NEO-ADJUVANT HT
  • DOSE FINDING
  • 54Gy, 57Gy, 60Gy

22
Class Solution
23
Acute Toxicity Comparison
24
Rectal Toxicity IMRT
  • RTOG late toxicity ()
  • Grade 1 2 3
  • MSK 81-86.4 Gy 12.6 1.4 0.8
  • Christie 57Gy 9 0 0

25
Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate
Cancer CHHIP
  • Conventional Fractionations
  • 74Gy 37F 7.5 weeks
  •  
  • T1B - T3A N0 M0
  • Risk of LN involvement 30 Hypofractionation
    Schedule 1
  • PSA lt40ng/ml 57Gy 19F 3.8 weeks
  •  
  • Hypofractionation Schedule 2
  • 60Gy 20F 4.0 weeks

26
Phase III Fractionation Trials
27
Optimising Radiation Delivery IGRT
  • Elekta SL20 linac
  • iView MV imager
  • KV imager at 90 deg to gantry head
  • Fluoroscopy bony structures and markers
  • 3D Cone beam CT images soft tissue structures

28
SERIAL XVI PROSTATE
Day 1
Day 2
RTP
Day 3
Day 4
29
BAT ULTRASOUND
30
Implanted Markers
31
HDR Brachytherapy
Dose Escalation Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy
32
Current HDR schedules
33
Is More always better?
Whole Pelvic XRT
34
Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy
  • Confounding Retrospective series
  • Old Randomised Studies( Stanford, RTOG 77-06)
  • Changing Practise
  • PCOS 1989 92
  • 1994 52
  • 1999 23
  • Re visited following RTOG 94-13

35
RTOG 94-13 RT
  • 1323 patients Risk of LN gt 15
  • WP RT
  • Conventional 4-field technique ( gt16x16cm)
  • 50.4 Gy for whole pelvis
  • 19.8 Gy for prostate boost
  • PO RT
  • Limited to prostate and seminal vesicles
  • 70.2 Gy
  • 4 months HT (NCHT or AHT)

36
No difference in 4 yr progression-free survival
for pt with NCHT compared with AHT
37
Progression-free survival of WP RT (54.2)
compared with PO RT (47)
38
4 yr progression-free advantage for all arm,60,
44, 49, 50
39
Areas of Equipoise in Radiation Management of
Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
  • Radiation dose/ fractionation CHIPP
  • Radiation Technique HDR
  • Pelvic XRT ??
  • Duration of Hormonal therapy
  • Adjuvant systemic therapy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com