Title: Avoid These 6 Mistakes In Data Annotation
1Avoid These 6 Mistakes In Data Annotation
- In traditional software development, the
efficiency of the delivered product depends on
its code quality. The same principle applies to
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning
(ML) projects. The quality of the data model
output is dependent on the quality of its data
labels. - Poorly labeled data leads to poor quality of data
models. Why does this matter so much?
Low-quality AI and ML models can lead to - An adverse impact on SEO and organic traffic (for
product websites) - An increase in customer churn
- Unethical errors or misrepresentations
- As data annotation (or labeling) is a continuous
process, AI and ML models need continuous
training to achieve accurate results. This
requires data-driven organizations to avoid
committing crucial mistakes in the annotation
process. - Here are six of the most common mistakes to avoid
in data annotation - projects
2- Assuming The Labeling Schema Will Not Change
- A common mistake among data annotators is to
design the labeling schema (in new projects) and
assume that it will not change. As ML projects
mature over time, data labeling schemas evolve
and change over time. For example, labeling
schemas can change in response to new products
(or categories). - Data annotation is expensive when performed
before the labeling schema is mature and
finalized. To avoid this mistake, data labelers
must work closely with domain experts (working
on the business problem to solve) and have
multiple iterations to stabilize the schema.
Programmatic labeling is another effective
technique that can prevent unnecessary work and
wastage. - Insufficient Data Collection For The Project
- Data is essential to the success of any AI or ML
project. For an accurate output, annotators must
feed their projects with large volumes of
high-quality data. Further, they must keep
feeding quality data to ML models to understand
and interpret the information. One common
mistake in annotation projects is collecting
insufficient data for the not-so-common
variables. - For instance, AI models are inadequately trained
when annotators label their images for only
commonly used variables. Deep learning data
models need an ample quantity of high-quality
data pieces. Hence, organizations must overcome
the high cost of proper data collection, which
can sometimes be impossible.
3- Misinterpreting The Instructions
- Data annotators or labelers need clear
instructions from their project managers on what
they should annotate (or which objects to label).
With misinterpreted instructions, annotators
cannot create an accurate data model. - Here is an example Labelers need to annotate a
single object (using a bounded box). However,
they may "misinterpret" the delivered
instructions and end up "bounding" multiple
objects in the image. - To avoid this mistake, project managers must
articulate clear and exhaustive instructions
which annotators cannot misunderstand.
Additionally, data annotators must double-check
the provided instructions to understand their
work clearly. - Bias In Class Names
- This mistake is also related to the previous
point of misinterpreting the instructions
(especially when working with external
annotators). Typically, external labelers are
not involved in schema designing. Hence, they
need proper instructions on how to label the
data. - Wrong instructions can lead to common mistakes
such as - Priming the user to pick one product category
over another. - Adding bias in annotation projects in the form of
data labels or suggestions. - Using "biased" class names like "Others," "Accesso
ries," or "Miscellaneous."
4- To avoid the common bias mistake, domain experts
must have multiple interactions with the
annotators, provide them with ample examples, and
request their feedback. - Selecting The Wrong Data Labeling Tools
- Due to the importance of data annotation, there
is a growing global market for annotation tools,
which is expected to grow at a healthy rate till
2027. Organizations need to select the right
tools to perform their data annotation. However,
many organizations prefer to develop in-house
labeling tools. Besides being expensive, in-house
labeling tools are unable to keep pace with the
growing complexity of annotation projects. - Additionally, current annotation tools were
developed in the earlier years of data analysis.
They cannot handle Big Data volumes (and complex
requirements) and lack the basic features of
modern tools. To avoid this mistake, companies
must look to invest in annotation tools developed
by third-party data specialists. - Missing Labels
- Data annotators often fail to label crucial
objects in AI or ML projects. This can severely
impact its quality. Human annotators can commit
this mistake when they are not observant or
simply miss some vital details. Missing labels
are tedious and time-consuming to resolve for
organizations, thus creating project delays and
escalating project costs. - To prevent this mistake, annotation projects must
have a clear feedback system communicated to the
annotators. Project managers must set up a
proper review process, where annotation work is
peer reviewed before the final approval.
Additionally, organizations must hire experienced
annotators with soft skills like an eye for
detail and high patience levels.
5Conclusion Accurate data labeling or annotation
is a vital cog in AI or ML projects and can
influence its output. The above-mentioned common
mistakes can undermine the data quality, making
it challenging to generate accurate results.
Data-dependent companies can avoid these common
mistakes by outsourcing their annotation work to
third-party professional companies. At EnFuse
Solutions, we offer specialized data annotation
services so that our customers can maximize
their investments in AI and ML technologies. We
customize our annotation services to each
client's specific needs. Let's collaborate for
your next AI or ML project. Connect with us
here. Read more Importance of Scale and Speed
in The Era of AI and ML