Master Franchise vs an Area Development Agreement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Master Franchise vs an Area Development Agreement

Description:

There is no formal rule for this regional division. For example, a business may sell American master franchisees and they further need to sell, train and support the franchisees in their location, but as per the franchise agreement, they would typically receive any franchise fees and royalties amount. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Master Franchise vs an Area Development Agreement


1
Master Franchise vs an Area Development
Agreement A franchise system sells a
sub-franchise (which is also known as a Master
franchise) with the motive to expand the
business in other locations. In fact, master
franchising is the best way to expand the brand
internationally. To have this, a master franchise
is normally sold to a person or an entity to
further sell the franchises in his own country
on the franchisors behalf. The main
responsibility of a master franchisee is to
recruit, train and support the franchisees
throughout that region. So, this franchise
system is best if business desires to expand
internationally.
2
  • Understanding a Master Franchis
  • Especially in the United States, many businesses
    have used this master franchising system to
    expand their business domestically by dividing
    the country into different regions. There is no
    formal rule for this regional division. For
    example, a business may sell American master
    franchisees and they further need to sell, train
    and support the franchisees in their location,
    but as per the franchise agreement, they would
    typically receive any franchise fees and
    royalties amount.
  • The Advantages Disadvantages of this method
  • Advantages of this business expansion method are a
    s follows
  • Local knowledge,
  • Quicker growth and
  • Potentially better logistical support for the
    franchisees.
  • Disadvantages of this business expansion method
    are as follows
  • Potential of weakening brand standards, this is
    because various American master franchisees are
    governing the process instead of the main
    franchisor.
  • Division of future cash flow to the franchisor.
  • If the system is not tightly monitored and
    managed by the main franchisor, this could also
    lead to fragmenting the brand which can ruin the
    brand image in the market. Many legal and
    administrative costs are involved in being a
    master franchise system. These are Franchise
    Disclosure Document (FDD) for the master
    franchisee and franchisor, which is usually
    drafted by consulting the best Franchise Law
    Firm. This legal document is very crucial, so
    every franchisee and franchisor must consult with
    a franchise lawyer to ensure the legal documents
    are according to both federal and state laws.

3
Difference between
a Master Franchise and an Area
Development Agreement The main difference between
a master franchise and an area development
agreement is that a master franchisee who buys a
territory or region has fully authorized to
develop his franchise region directly. But, an
area developer is basically supported and
trained by his associated franchisor and is
permitted to open certain locations within the
territory within a given time frame. Area
Developer is the next best method for rapid
expansion after franchising system. There is no
sure-shot method of expansion it solely depends
on the business goals. Every business expansion
method has its own pros and cons. If you are
considering area development or master
franchising as an expansion method, dont forget
to consult your franchise lawyer as he is the
best source to guide you in this matter. For
More About Our Products Click here for visit our
website www.franchise-law.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com