Title: Development of Sound Localization 2
1Development of Sound Localization 2
- How do the neural mechanisms subserving sound
localization develop?
2Overview of the development of sound localization
- Gross localization responses are observed soon
after the cochlea begins to function and in
newborn humans. - The precision of sound localization improves
between birth and 5 years of age. - Localization under complex listening conditions
takes longer to develop. - Experience appears necessary for the formation of
auditory spatial maps.
3Overview of this lecture
- Electrophysiological evidence of development of
binaural hearing mechanisms in humans. - Morphological and physiological evidence of
development of binaural hearing mechanisms in
nonhumans. - Limitations imposed by immature peripheral
coding. - Development of spatial maps and role of
experience.
4ABR binaural interaction component
5MLR binaural interaction component
6Binaural responses detectable in most newborns
7Newborn binaural responses suggest limitations on
binaural processing
8Conclusion
- Binaural evoked potentials have not been well
described in human infants
9Morphological and physiological evidence of
binaural development in nonhumans
- What limits binaural processing during
development?
10Lateral superior olive IID circuit
11Medial superior olive ITD circuit
12Responses of LSO neurons to IID
13Responses of MSO neurons to ITD
14Normalized spike rate?
15Immature neurons dont respond much
16Immature LSO provides less information about IID
17Range of IIDs eliciting a response increases with
age.
18Immature phase locking will lead to poor ITD
processing
19Conclusions re interaural cue calculation in the
immature auditory system
- The circuits used in calculating interaural
differences are in place when the cochlea starts
to function. - The immature responses of neurons that provide
input to the superior olive limit interaural cue
calculation. - The neurons of the superior olive may also be
immature, independent of their inputs.
20Forming a map of auditory space
-10 degrees visual angle in azimuth - 5 degrees
visual angle in elevation .6 meters away
20 degrees visual angle in azimuth 5 degrees
visual angle in elevation .6 meters away
21The auditory system is laid out by frequency and
calculates auditory space
Calculated spatial representation in the brain
Intensity X Frequency X Time representation in
the ear
Auditory scene
22, -7, .6
20, -10, .6
buzz
-10, -20, .6
hum
ring
click
20, -20, .4
Neural computation of auditory space
22The visual system is laid out spatially
23Visual and auditory spatial representations are
superimposed
Spatial representation in auditory pathway
Multimodal spatial representation in the brain
Intensity X Frequency X Time representation in
the ear
22, -7, .6
20, -10, .6
buzz
-10, -20, .6
hum
Scene
ring
20, -20, .4
click
Spatial representation on retina
24Normal development of SC response in guinea pigs
Azimuthal plane
Neurons respond to sounds in these locations
25Effects of visual and auditory experience on
spatial maps
26Effects of abnormal auditory experience on
spatial maps
27Effects of dark rearing on spatial maps
28Brief normal exposure is sufficient for normal
spatial maps
29Spectral as well as interaural cues are important
30Abnormal experience can produce unusual neural
responses.
Normal experience
Disparate experience
31Where does experience have its effects?
Spatial representation in auditory pathway
Multimodal spatial representation in the brain
Intensity X Frequency X Time representation in
the ear
22, -7, .6
20, -10, .6
buzz
-10, -20, .6
hum
Scene
ring
20, -20, .4
click
Spatial representation on retina
32Implications Blind people and sound localization
- Blind people (and visually deprived guinea pigs)
have same discrimination-type sound localization
abilities as sighted people. - Interestingly, they are able to localize sound
sources by pointing as well as sighted people. - Conclusion Vision isnt the only sense that can
define space.
33Conclusions
- Not surprisingly, binaural evoked responses can
be evoked from newborn infants, although the
morphology of some responses change with age - Whether binaural interaction or improvements in
monaural coding is responsible for changes in
response is not clear. - Normal multimodal experience is required for the
formation of auditory maps of space.