Lancaster Independent School District

1
Lancaster Independent School District

• AEIS Report

2
District 2007 Rating

• Academically Acceptable

3
Rating Categories

• Exemplary
• meet 90 passing standard for each subject
• Recognized
• meet 75 passing standard for each subject
• Academically Acceptable
• meet established passing standard for each
  subject.
• Academically Unacceptable
• below established passing standards

4
Rating Indicators

• Assessment Indicators
• 2007 TAKS passing standard met at established
  percentages for all students and student groups
  percentages met expectations (African American,
  Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantage)
• Completion Dropout Indicators

5
2007 Campus Ratings
6
District Results Reading
Section I Page 4
7
District ResultsMathematics
Section I Page 4
8
District ResultsWriting
Section I Page 4
9
District ResultsScience
Section I Page 4
10
District Results Social Studies
Section I Page 4
11
District ResultsSDAA II
Section I Page 5
12
TAKS Exit Level Cumulative Pass Rate
Section I Page 8
13
Percent of Failures Passing TAKS
Section I Page 8
14
Percent of Failures Passing TAKS
Section I Page 8
15
Student Success Initiative3rd Grade - Reading
Section I Page 8
16
Student Success Initiative 5rd Grade - Reading
Section I Page 8
17
Student Success Initiative 5rd Grade -
Mathematics
Section I Page 9
18
English Language Learners
Section I Page 9
19
Attendance Rate
Section I Page 9
20
District ResultsAnnual Dropout Rate
Section I Page 9
21
District ResultsCompletion Rate I
Completion Rate for 2006 is on appeal with Texas
Education Agency.
Section I Page 10
22
District ResultsSAT / ACT Results
SAT/ACT Results (Section 1, page 11). The
district has contacted the College Board to
determine the lack of data reported.
Section I Page 11
23
SAT ResultsMean SAT Score
Section I Page 11
24
ACT ResultsMean ACT Score
Section I Page 11
25
District 2007 Rating

• Student Information

26
Student InformationEthnic Distribution
Section II Page 1
27
Student InformationClass Size Averages
Section II Page 2
28
Student InformationClass Size Averages
Section II Page 2
29
District 2007 Rating

• Staffing Information

30
Staff InformationProfessional Staff
Section II Page 3
31
Teacher InformationEthnic Distribution
Section II Page 3
32
Teacher InformationHighest Degree Held
NOTE This area of the report contains
inaccurate data as a result of a data reporting
error. Due to NCLB/AYP reporting, the district
acceptable with a 97 rate of highly qualified
teachers on staff.
Section II Page 3
33
Teacher InformationYears of Experience
Section II Page 3
34
Teacher InformationStudents Per Teacher
Section II Page 3
35
Teacher InformationExperience
Section II Page 4
36
Teacher InformationTurnover Rate
Section II Page 4
37
InstructionalExpenditure
State Required Percent of ExpendituresExpended
for Instruction(Functions 11, 36, 93, 95) 2006
2007 ? 55 2007 2008 ? 60 2008 2009 ? 65
Section II Page 6
38
District 2007 Rating

• Academically Acceptable