Toulmin Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Toulmin Argument

Description:

The Toulmin Model, developed by British logician Stephen Toulmin, identified a 6 ... Reagan press secretary, who was shot and permanently injured by John Hinckley. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:636
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: e200702288
Category:
Tags: argument | toulmin

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Toulmin Argument


1
Toulmin Argument
  • The Toulmin Model, developed by British logician
    Stephen Toulmin, identified a 6-step process of
    logical argumentation which employs both
    inductive and deductive logic.
  • Toulmin identified elements of a persuasive
    argument which provide useful categories by which
    an argument may be analyzed.

2
Claim
  • A claim is the statement or proposition that you
    are asking other people to accept. This includes
    information you are asking them to accept as true
    or actions you want them to accept and enact.
  • Scenario Lately you keep having to repeat
    everything to your grandfather. What is an
    example of a claim you might make to him?
  • Why isnt a claim enough?

3
Grounds
  • The grounds (or data) are the basis of real
    persuasion and are made up of data and hard
    facts, plus the reasoning behind the claim. It is
    the truth on which the claim is based. Grounds
    may also include proof of expertise and the basic
    premises on which the rest of the argument is
    built.
  • The actual truth of the data may be less than
    100, as all data is based on perception and
    hence has some element of assumption about it.

4
Grounds (contd.)
  • It is critical to the argument that the grounds
    are not challenged because if they are, they may
    become a claim, which you will need to prove with
    even deeper information and further argument.
  • What is an example of grounds or data for your
    earlier claim?
  • Why is data so important to an argument?

5
Warrant
  • This is the inference that makes the connection
    between the claim and the grounds. It
    legitimizes the claim by showing the grounds to
    be relevant.
  • It is often unstated and is based on assumptions.
  • Example That dog is probably a good swimmer
    (claim). It is a Yellow Lab (grounds). What is
    the warrant?

6
Warrant (contd.)
  • It answers the unspoken audience questions of
    Why does that data mean your claim is true? or
    How did you arrive at that claim based upon the
    data presented?
  • What might be a warrant you could offer in the
    argument with your grandfather?
  • Warrants may be based on logos, ethos, or pathos,
    or values that are assumed to be shared with the
    listener.
  • Example Needle exchange programs should be
    abolished claim because they only cause more
    people to use drugs. What is the warrant here?

7
Warrant (contd.)
  • A warrant can be classified according to purpose
    and type
  • Authoritative
  • Motivational
  • Substantive
  • Authoritative warrants rely on expert testimony
    to verify a claim generically state that
    qualified sources conclude that based on this
    data the following conclusion is justified
    dependent on backing offered in terms of expert
    testimony
  • What is an example of an authoritative warrant
    used by MLK in Letter from Birmingham Jail?

8
Warrant (contd.)
  • Motivational warrants rely on appeals to the
    audiences convictions, virtues, and values to
    support the claim. Speakers must rely on precise
    audience analysis in order to understand what
    motivational appeals would be effective.
  • What is an example of a motivational warrant used
    by MLK?

9
Warrant (contd.)
  • Substantive warrants more closely resemble
    traditional forms of logical reasoning. Several
    types of reasoning processes
  • Cause-Effect/Effect-Cause (MLK I-it vs.
    I-thou
  • Example
  • Classification

10
Backing
  • Backing is support material that supports the
    warrant in the argument.
  • Helps audience understand the reasoning used in
    the warrant.
  • This is additional justification or reasons to
    back up the warrant. Backing can help audience
    understand the reasoning used in the warrant.
    With backing, the argument (and the speaker)
    seems more credible.
  • Without backing, audience may question the
    reasoning in the argument.

11
Backing (contd.)
  • Can include any type of support material
    statistics, examples, testimony.
  • Statistics use numbers to quantify things, but
    they can create an illusion of truth (There
    are lies, damn lies, and statistics.).
  • What might be common sources of statistics?

12
Backing (contd.)
  • Examples are concrete instances or situations
    that illustrate the warrant.
  • Clearer because they provide a real world
    illustration of what is being said.
  • There is a danger in generalizing an example to
    be true in all situations.

13
Backing (contd.)
  • Testimony involves use of expert opinion or
    personal experience, both of which can add
    credibility.
  • Example of Backing Claim The government
    should tax companies for the pollution they
    produce. Warrant Pollution harms the health of
    citizens. Possible Backing statistics from
    scientific studies on effects of air pollution.

14
Backing (contd.)
  • Another example Claim Handguns should be
    banned. Grounds Handguns were involved in
    20,000 deaths last year. Warrant Handguns
    cause needless deaths. Backing a quote from
    James Brady, former Reagan press secretary, who
    was shot and permanently injured by John Hinckley.

15
Reservation/Rebuttal
  • An exception to the claim presented by the
    arguer.
  • In Toulmins model, arguments are not universally
    true. The rebuttal demonstrates how arguments
    can be strengthened via the limitations of the
    argument.
  • Example Claim Air pollution is the number one
    risk to the environment. Rebuttal The nuclear
    hazard around Chernobyl far outweighs the risk of
    air pollution.
  • What might be a rebuttal in the handgun argument?

16
Qualifier
  • Because Toulmin advocated practical reasoning,
    all arguments have relative strength. Qualifiers
    verbalize the relative strength of an argument.
  • Qualifiers represent the soundness or worth of an
    argument or indicate the strength of the leap
    from the data to the warrant and may limit how
    universally the claim applies.

17
Qualifier (contd.)
  • Example If you were arguing that a certain film
    is one people would enjoy, you might say people
    will probably enjoy it since you cannot predict
    with certainty the subjective experience of
    others.
  • Another example Claim Handguns are leading to
    the destruction of the school system. Qualifier
    Handguns are likely one of the key factors
    leading to the erosion of American schools.
  • What is an example of a qualifier for the claim
    about your grandfathers hearing?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com