Applied Econometrics: Panel Lecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Applied Econometrics: Panel Lecture

Description:

Panel econometrics is a huge field and to cover everything would not be possible. This lecture aims to introduce you to panel econometrics using research examples. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ucd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applied Econometrics: Panel Lecture


1
Applied Econometrics Panel Lecture
  • Chapter 16, Gujarati
  • In Panel Data, the Same Cross-sectional Unit Is
    Surveyed Over Time.

2
Introduction
  • Today we will examine panel econometrics.
  • One of the biggest areas of modern econometrics.
  • See Gujarati for introduction.
  • More advanced panel textbooks outside the scope
    of our discussion.
  • Today we will introduce these topics and look at
    some empirical examples.

3
Topics of Discussion
  • Types of data cross sectional/time
    series/panel.
  • Reexaming economic models.
  • Types of panel.
  • Example of panel.
  • Estimating panel models.
  • Fixed effects versus random effects.

4
Main Point of Lecture
  • Panel econometrics is a huge field and to cover
    everything would not be possible. This lecture
    aims to introduce you to panel econometrics using
    research examples. Particularly, I want to
    discuss when and why you would use fixed versus
    random effects models.

5
Terminology
  • Time series cross section data/ micropanel
    data/longitudanal data/cohort analysis/ event
    history analysis.
  • Many authors use the above terms
    interchangeably. Will talk about some potential
    distinctions.

6
Why Panel Data?
  • Allows one to analyse issues such as persistency
    (e.g. Unemployment).
  • Allows one to examine complex behavioural models
    (e.g. Life cycle models of saving/consumption).
  • Allows one to explicitly take in to account
    individual heterogeneity.

7
Limitations of Panel Data
  • (i) Measurement Error that can arise in survey
    data
  • (ii) Self-Selection in to the panel
  • (iii) Non-Response
  • (iv) Attrition
  • (v) Typically, micro-panels cover a short time
    dimension e.g. the Living in Ireland covers only
    from 1994 to 2001.

8
Some Examples of Panel
  • Labour economics, welfare economics and several
    other fields rely heavily on household panel
    studies.
  • Panel study of income dynamics (Michigan).
  • Industrial economics utilises very large panel
    datasets (e.g. Amadeus).
  • In Ireland, the ESRI ran the living in Ireland
    survey panel from 1994 to 2001 (will examine some
    of this later in the class).

9
Famous Panel Studies
  • Canadian Survey of Labour Income Dynamics
  • Japanese Panel on Consumers
  • Korea Labor and Income Panel Surveys
  • Household Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia
  • Indonesia Family Life Surveys

10
Economic Modelling
  • Very similar principles of economic modelling
    apply to panel as applied to the other techniques
    we have examined.
  • Specification issues e.g. Omitted variables or
    irrelevant included variables.
  • Distributional issues e.g. Non-normality.

11
An Example of a Panel Model (1)
  • Grunfelds (1958) investment data.
  • A little dated but will help us to work through
    the stuff in gujarati.
  • Q how does investment depend on the real value
    of the firm and the real capital stock?
  • Data 4 companies for 20 years (from 1935
    1954).

12
5 Ways of Estimating a Panel Model
  • Assume that intercepts and slopes are the same
    over time and individuals.
  • Assume that slopes are constant but that
    intercepts vary over individuals.
  • Assume that slopes are constant but that
    intercepts vary over time and individuals.
  • Assume that all coefficients vary over
    individuals.
  • Assume that all coefficients vary over
    individuals and time.

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Fixed Effect Panel Model
  • The intercept in the regression is allowed to
    differ among individuals in recognition of the
    fact that each individual (unit) may have
    characteristics of their own.
  • Also known as the least squares dummy variable
    model.

17
Why use Fixed Effects
  • Fixed Effects are generally used when there is a
    correlation between the individual intercept and
    the independent variables.
  • Generally used when n is relatively small and t
    is relatively large.

18
Random Effects Model
  • Random Effects models assume that the intercept
    of an individual unit is a random drawing from a
    much larger population with a constant mean
    value.
  • Also (less frequently) know as the Error
    Components model.

19
Fixed Effects or Random Effects
  • IF N is large and T is small, and if the
    assumptions underlying RE hold, the RE are more
    efficient estimators.
  • Use Fixed Effects if the errors and the
    observations are correlated (e.g. countries).
  • The Hausman test is distributed Chi-Squared
    Asymptotic around the null hypothesis that Random
    Effects is appropriate.

20
Hausman Test
  • Hausman (1978).
  • The null hypothesis is that the FE and RE do not
    differ substantially.
  • Test is distributed asymptotically chi-squared.
  • FE is consistent under both the null and the
    alternative.
  • RE is consistent under the null and inconsistent
    under the alternative.
  • We can test the appropriateness of RE using
    critical values.

21
(No Transcript)
22
An Example of a Panel Model (2)
  • Did people get better off over the course of the
    Celtic tiger?
  • We certainly became richer but how about happier
    or more satisfied with our income?
  • To address this question I have been analysing a
    panel of people tracked from 1994 to 2001.

23
An Example of a Panel Model (3)
  • What are the determinants of international
    disputes.
  • Beck et. al. (1998) in their paper on
    international conflict, and consist of
    time-varying data on 827 politically-relevant
    dyads in the international system. Each dyad has
    one observation for each year from 19501985,
    inclusive. Omitting observations with ongoing
    conflicts, this yields a total N 20448.
  • This data is taken from Chris Zorns Easter
    Workshop on Panel Econometrics at Oxford.

24
  • Dyadid The dyad identification number.
  • Year The year identifier.
  • Dispute 1 if a militarized interstate dispute
    occurred between the members of that dyad in that
    year, 0 otherwise.
  • Start The starting counter variable.
  • Duration The duration variable.
  • Democ Rescaled POLITY democracy variable (
    -1,1).
  • Growth Lagged measure of growth, as a proportion
    of GDP.
  • Allies 1 if the dyad members are allied, 0
    otherwise.
  • contig 1if the members of the dyad are
    geographically contiguous, 0 otherwise.
  • Capratio The natural log of the ratio of the two
    states military capacities, as measured by the
  • Correlates of War (COW) data.
  • Trade The ratio of bilateral trade to GDP, in
    constant US dollars.

25
Outside the Scope (1)
  • Generalised Panels can utilise many different
    distributional forms with many different types of
    data.
  • Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Techniques that make
    less assumptions about the full distribution have
    become increasingly utilised.
  • STATA package of choice for most researchers but
    other packages such as LIMDEP and R have become
    increasingly used.

26
Outside the Scope (2)
  • A great deal of work has been conducted on what
    to do with the problem of unbalanced panel data.
  • Sample selection models to deal with panel
    attrition have also become increasingly important
    in the literature.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com