The Homeowner as the Risk

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The Homeowner as the Risk

Description:

Las Vegas, Nevada -- March 13, 2001 ... Auto versus Homeowners Ratemaking. Auto: ... Should external data be periodically re-evaluated & the book re-classified? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: allst
Learn more at: http://www.casact.org

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Homeowner as the Risk


1
The Homeowner as the Risk
Becky Orsi, FCAS, MAAA Allstate Insurance Company
  • 2001 CAS Ratemaking Seminar
  • Las Vegas, Nevada -- March 13, 2001
  • Session Emerging Issues in Homeowners Insurance
    Ratemaking (PROP-40)

2
Auto versus Homeowners Ratemaking
  • Auto
  • Traditionally we think of the driver as the risk
    for liability coverage and in some cases for
    physical damage as well
  • We insure the car, but rate on the driver
  • Homeowners
  • The house is the risk to be insured
  • What if we view the homeowner as the risk instead
    of the house?

3
Possible New Homeowner Rating Plans
  • Driver Profile
  • Claims Rating
  • Retired Discount

4
Areas of Consideration for New Rating Plans
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality Cost-Effectiveness
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability

5
Driver Profile
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Objectivity specifically determinable facts and
    not easily manipulated
  • How can this information be used in an objective
    manner for homeowners insurance?
  • Example of external, non-insurance data
  • Consider how to handle insureds for whom driver
    information is not available

6
Driver Profile
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Causality
  • No need for cause-and-effect relationship
  • Must use information that is reasonable and not
    obscure and irrelevant
  • Practical Questions
  • Cost of obtaining driver profile information
  • New and existing business
  • Is communication to the customer needed?

7
Driver Profile
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Data
  • Is the source of the information reliable?
  • If the customer disputes the information, how
    will this be handled?
  • Reclassification
  • Should external data be periodically re-evaluated
    the book re-classified?
  • Actuarial question practical question
  • Possibly a regulatory issue

8
Driver Profile
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Public Acceptability
  • Does the plan differentiate unfairly among risks?
  • Relevancy of external data for rating may need to
    be addressed with the public
  • Privacy issues
  • Will a risk identify naturally with his/her
    classification?

9
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Objectivity specifically determinable facts and
    not easily manipulated
  • To do this, a consistent definition of a
    chargeable claim must be created
  • Both new and existing customers should be
    considered

10
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Causality
  • No need for a cause-and-effect relationship
  • However, relationship of past claims to future
    experience is reasonable and not obscure and
    irrelevant
  • Is the predictive relationship stronger for some
    types of claims than others?

11
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Is it practical to implement Claims Rating?
  • Implement retrospectively or prospectively for
    existing business?
  • Cost of obtaining claim data
  • Multiple dwellings
  • Whose claim history will be used?

12
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Data Issues
  • New business -- An outside data source for claim
    history is needed
  • Existing business -- There is a need to link the
    rating algorithm with past claims history

13
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Reclassification
  • Claims will naturally age out of the experience
    period
  • How should a customer moving to a new residence
    be handled?

14
Claims Rating
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Public Acceptability
  • Does the plan differentiate unfairly among risks?
  • Relevancy of prior claim data may need to be
    addressed
  • Both issues are related to nature of Homeowners
    claims

15
Retired Discount
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Objectivity
  • Consider how age might be used in defining
    retired
  • Consider how employment may be used

16
Retired Discount
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Causality
  • Is being retired relevant to Homeowners risk
    classification?
  • Practicality/Data Issue
  • How do you obtain age and retirement status for
    existing book of business?

17
Retired Discount
  • Objectivity
  • Causality
  • Practicality
  • Data
  • Reclassification
  • Public Acceptability
  • Reclassification
  • How does retired status change?
  • Public Acceptability
  • Fairness/Relevancy
  • Privacy issues

18
References
  • American Academy of Actuaries
  • Risk Classification Statement of Principles
  • Actuarial Standards Board
  • Actuarial Standard of Practice 12 Concerning
    Risk Classification
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)