The postwar project: Economic development in practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The postwar project: Economic development in practice

Description:

Underdevelopment has a single cause ... structures, diversity of economy, political structures, culture, etc. ... Commentary. Growth theory: technology is exogenous ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: anno
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The postwar project: Economic development in practice


1
The postwar project Economic development in
practice
  • IS290/IS190
  • ICT4D Context, Strategies, and Impacts

2
Fallacies in development theory
  • Underdevelopment has a single cause
  • A single criterion suffices for evaluating
    development performance
  • Development is a log-linear process

3
Fallacy 1 Underdevelopment has but a single
cause
  • . . .or panaceas that failed (Easterly)
  • Classical theorists Adam Smith, Karl Marx,
    Joseph Schumpeter had multidimensional historical
    views of development resources, technical
    knowledge, social and institutional structures,
    diversity of economy, political structures,
    culture, etc.
  • Mainstream postwar development theory tended to
    be mono causal and suggest uni-dimensional
    solutions

4
X-factor as the magic bullet
  • Underdevelopment is due to constraint X if
    loosen X, then development will be inevitable
    result. Xcapital, skill, technology, etc.
  • Each may have limited applicability in
    particular places at particular times, but not
    necessary and sufficient for development

5
X physical capital, 1940-70
  • Investment is key to growth capital
    fundamentalism
  • Soviet model of growth continuing investment in
    capital intensive industry, infrastructure
  • Memories of Marshall plan reconstruction
  • Bretton Woods institutions World Bank (IBRD),
    International Monetary Fund (IMF), postwar
    bilateral foreign assistance programs all based
    on this assumption

6
Digression on growth theory I
  • Harrod-Domar model
  • Growth depends on the quantity of capital
    labor investment leads to capital accumulation,
    which generates economic growth (Keynesian.)
  • Developing economies have plentiful labor but
    scarce physical capital, and low incomes mean low
    savings/investment.
  • Policy implication economic growth depends on
    policies to increase saving and investment
  • Assumes fixed capital-output, capital-labor ratios

7
Growth poles as spatial counterpart
  • ..belief in the power of heavy industrial
    investment to radically alter the structure of
    the economy. . . It was argued that sufficient
    capital could produce instant modernization.
  • Lisa Peattie Planning Rethinking Ciudad Guyana
    1987
  • Big ticket infrastructure modern steel mills,
    huge hydroelectric projects. Confidence that
    leading sectors would pull rest of economy
    along in a march to societal progress.

8
X entrepreneurship (1958-65)
  • Influenced by Schumpeterian theory
  • Deficiency of entrepreneurship need private
    sector industrialists to lead growth
  • Creation of International Finance Corp (IFC) as
    part of World Bank Group
  • Government seeks to influence supply of
    entrepreneurship or to substitute for
    entrepreneurship

9
Entrepreneurship private investment
  • IFC, founded 1956 Our mission is to promote
    sustainable private sector investment in
    developing countries, helping to reduce poverty
    and improve people's lives.
  • Products innovative financial arrangements such
    as loans, equity and quasi-equity investments,
    guarantees and stand-by finance, etc.

10
Digression on growth theory II
  • Neoclassical (Solow) growth model
  • Key addition Capital subject to diminishing
    returns
  • Long run growth via increase in productivity of
    labornot capital accumulation
  • Difference between capital intensity (K/L) and
    technology (output per worker hour)
  • Solow (1956, 1957) calculated that the residual
    accounted for four-fifths of US economic growth
  • Growth rate depends on technological innovation
    and so is exogenous (outside model)

11
X incorrect relative prices (1970-80)
  • ILO observation of growth and industrialization
    with high unemployment and inequality
  • Economic dualism capital intensive modern
    industry v. low productivity, small firms
  • Belief that relative factor prices did not
    reflect relative economic scarcity subsidies gt
    capital under priced, labor overpriced relative
    to availability gt inappropriate technology
  • Solution favor labor intensive prodn via import
    substitution, raise tariffs for capital intensive

12
X international trade (1980- )
  • Inefficiencies of government sponsored
    industrialization (protection, subsidies, etc.)
  • International trade promoted as substitute for
    inadequate domestic demand removing barriers to
    trade in commodities will automatically gt rapid
    export-led growth
  • Comparative advantage plus domestic and trade
    liberalization as sufficient (panacea?)

13
X hyperactive government (1980-96)
  • Government is not the solution to development,
    its the problem it corrupt distorts market
    incentives
  • Solution is to minimize role of government in
    domestic (as well as international) markets
  • gt Washington consensus

14
Commentary
  • Growth theory technology is exogenous
  • Microeconomics theory of static resource
    allocation
  • Assumptions for market equilibrium least
    applicable in developing economies where factors
    are not mobile, information is not perfect,
    institutions poorly developed, etc.
  • Market equilibrium depends on initial
    distribution of wealth if that is not optimal
    them wont achieve welfare maximization

15
Digression on growth theory III
  • New growth theory (1980s)
  • Technological change endogenous to model
  • Increasing (not diminishing) returns to capital
    investment via virtual cycles of innovation and
    human capital improvements spill over
  • Learning by doing and economies of scale
  • Policy RD and/or human capital investment

16
X human capital (1988- )
  • Low human capital endowments as obstacle
  • New growth theory human capital and knowledge
    magnify productivity of capital raw labor
  • Multiple growth trajectories high growth, high
    factor productivity, econ of scale when have high
    levels of human capital and knowledge
  • gt Brain drain and underemployment due to lack
    of demand, complementary opportunities

a
17
The limits of growth theory?
  • Emerging consensus that new growth theory no more
    successful than neoclassical growth theory in
    explaining income divergence btwn developed and
    developing economies. (Both predict LT income
    convergence. . .)
  • Why? Econ factors institutional arrangements,
    internal market barriers, trade barriers, etc.
  • What about other factors bad govts,
    polarization due to ethnic conflict and
    inequality excessive red tape, black markets,
    high levels of debt, inflation, etc.

18
X ineffective government (1997- )
  • Reevaluation of optimal role of government
  • 1. East Asian successes govt role in shift from
    import-subs to export promotion
  • 2. Backlash against neo-liberalism in advanced
    economies focus on corruption
  • 3. Mixed success of market reforms in 1980s lead
    institutions like WB to see need for capable,
    committed governments to reform

19
Fallacy 2 Single criterion suffices for
evaluating development performance
  • GNP per capita only national potential for
    improving welfare of majority, not actual
  • Need for multidimensional criteria such as Human
    Development Index (UNDP) that involve
    distribution measures and other indicators of
    human welfare
  • Ideal battery of disaggregated performance
    indicators to index national welfare evolution

20
Fallacy 3 Development is a log-linear process
  • Solow a single unique production function that
    characterizes all countries, based on supply of
    inputs, capital, labor, and natural resources
  • Growth of total output is function of rate of
    change of physical inputs rate of growth of per
    capital output is function of rate of change of
    capital-labor ratio, natural resources, and
    residual (technological change)
  • Ignores initial conditions history, levels,
    path dependence

21
Alternative propositions
  • Development process is highly nonlinear
  • Development trajectories not unique
  • Initial conditions shape subsequent devel.
  • Development trajectories can be altered via
    policy, they are malleable
  • Economic development is a highly multifaceted,
    non-linear, path-dependent, dynamic process that
    involves shifting interactions between different
    aspects of development

22
Additional resources
  • Gerald Meier and Joseph Stiglitz, eds. Frontiers
    of Development Economics (2001)
  • Lisa Peattie Planning Rethinking Ciudad Guyana
    (1987)
  • Jane Jacobs Cities and the Wealth of Nations
    Principles of Economic Life(1984)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com