Environmental Scan Brief - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Environmental Scan Brief

Description:

'And those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held ... Geopolitics of Energy. Decay of International Institutions 'Gold Standard Pubs' Globalization ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: joseca2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Environmental Scan Brief


1
Environmental Scan Brief
  • Corporate Strategy Group
  • NDIA Executive Forum
  • 24 February 2009

2
Im going out. Can I bring you back any
firsthand knowledge of the outside world?
3
Taking A Strategic Pause
  • Strategic Context
  • Requirements Guidance
  • Warfighter Relevance

4
  • And those of us who manage the publics dollars
    will be held to account to spend wisely, reform
    bad habits, and do our business in the light of
    day because only then can we restore the vital
    trust between a people and their government.
  • President Barack Obama
  • Inaugural Speech
  • 20 January 2009

5
Strategic Context
Alignment of DNI and DoD
6
In reality . . . the categories of warfare are
blurring and no longer fit into neat, tidy boxes.
One can expect to see more tools and tactics of
destruction -- from the sophisticated to the
simple -- being employed simultaneously in hybrid
and more complex forms of warfare. The
Honorable Robert Gates Secretary of
Defense A Balanced Strategy Foreign
Affairs, Jan/Feb 2009
7
Strategic Context
  • Global Trends 2025 A World Transformed
  • Overarching U.S. Strategic Direction from DoD

8
Global Trends 2025A World Transformed
9
Among the messages we hope to convey are If
you like where events seem to be headed, you may
want to take timely action to preserve their
positive trajectory. If you do not like where
they appear to be going, you will have to develop
and implement policies to change their
trajectory. . . . An even more important message
is that leadership matters, no trends are
immutable, and that timely and well-informed
intervention can decrease the likelihood and
severity of negative developments and increase
the likelihood of positive ones. C. Thomas
Fingar Chairman, National Intelligence
Council Global Trends 2025 A Transformed
World November 2008
10
(No Transcript)
11
Global 2025 Key Strategic Drivers
  • Globalization
  • Demography
  • Rise of New Powers
  • Climate Change
  • Geopolitics of Energy
  • Decay of International Institutions

12
Overarching U.S. Strategic DirectionAccording
to DoD
13
DoD Gold Standard Publications . . .
  • National Defense Strategy (JUN 2008)
  • Quadrennial Defense Review (FEB 2006)
  • National Military Strategy (MAY 2004)
  • Unified Command Plan (DEC 2008)
  • Guidance for Employment of the Force (Classified)
  • Guidance for Development of the Force (Classified)

14
Gold Standard Pubs Key Strategic Drivers
  • Globalization
  • Population Resource Pressures
  • Rise of Near-Peer competitor
  • Effect of Climate Change
  • Transnational Security Challenges
  • Preventing Proliferation of WMD
  • Retain Conventional Warfighting Capability,
    Invest in Unconventional Means

15
Comparative Assessment
  • Gold Standard Pubs
  • Globalization
  • Population Pressures
  • Rise of Near-Peer competitor
  • Effect of Climate Change
  • Resource Pressures
  • Global 2025
  • Globalization
  • Demography
  • Rise of New Powers
  • Climate Change
  • Geopolitics of Energy
  • Decay of International Institutions

16
(No Transcript)
17
Key Projections
  • U.S. will remain most powerful country, albeit
    less dominant
  • Global multipolar system emerging, with rise of
    China, India and others, as well as relative
    increase in power of non-state actors
  • Economic growth and demographic trends will
    increase pressure on energy, food and water
    resources
  • Appeal of terrorism could lessen, but diffusion
    of technologies could put dangerous capabilities
    within their reach.
  • Potential for conflict will increase due to rapid
    changes in greater Middle East and spread of
    lethal capability

18
Implications
  • Demand for U.S. leadership likely to remain
    strong, but capacities will shrink
  • Number of actors on the international stage,
    including non-state elements, will increase
  • Decline of dollar from global reserve currency
    to first among equals may force difficult
    trade-offs between foreign policy goals and
    domestic costs
  • More limited military superiority as potential
    adversaries try to level the playing field
  • Ability to absorb shocks will remain better than
    most, but also depends on the strength and
    resilience of the international system

19
Character of Conflict Circa 2025
  • Increasing Importance of Information
  • Rapid proliferation of long-range precision
    weapons
  • Importance of IT as enabler will make information
    a primary target in future conflicts
  • Evolution of Irregular Warfare Capabilities
  • Adoption of IW tactics by state and non-state
    actors
  • Modern communications technologies will enhance
    ability of IW forces to organize, coordinate and
    execute dispersed operations
  • Prominence of Non-Military Aspects of Warfare
  • Cyber, economic, resource, psychological, and
    information
  • Media warfare to dominate 24/7 news cycle
  • Expansion and Escalation of Conflicts Beyond the
    Traditional Battlefield
  • Containing conflicts beyond traditional into
    cyber and space domains will be problematic

20
Requirements Guidance
What is needed has never been clearer
21
Requirements Guidance
  • Guidance Alignment
  • President-Elect Obama Foreign Affairs Article
  • Secretary Gates Foreign Affairs Article
  • CJCS Guidance 2008-2009
  • CNO Guidance 2009
  • NETWARCOM 2009 Commanders Guidance
  • Institutional Reform and Governance
  • Background
  • Guidance for Employment of the Force (GEF)
  • Guidance for Development of the Force (GDF)
  • Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP)

22
Guidance Alignment
23
President-Elect Obama Foreign Affairs
ArticleRenewing American Leadership
24
Twenty-first Century Threats
  • Weapons of Mass Destruction
  • Global Terrorism
  • Rogue States Rising Powers
  • Weak States
  • Warming Planet
  • New diseases
  • More devastating natural disasters
  • Catalyze deadly conflicts (e.g. over water)

25
Broad Strokes of Renewal
  • Moving Beyond Iraq
  • Revitalizing the Military
  • Halting the Spread of Nuclear Weapons/WMD
  • Combating Global Terrorism
  • Rebuilding our Partnerships
  • Building Democratic Societies
  • Restoring Americas Trust

26
Secretary Gates Foreign Affairs ArticleA
Balanced Strategy
27
Reprogramming the Pentagon Balance
  • Prevail in current conflict
  • Institutionalizing capabilities like
    counterinsurgency foreign military assistance
  • Retaining cultural traits that have made U.S.
    forces successful
  • Preparing for other contingencies
  • Maintaining existing conventional and strategic
    technological edge
  • Shedding those that hamper their ability to do
    what needs to be done

28
Unconventional Thinking Required
  • Failure in Iraq/Afghanistan not an option
  • Fundamental Concern Deeply embedded support for
    conventional modernization programs, but there is
    no commensurate institutional supportfor the
    capabilities needed to win todays wars
  • Military and civilian (e.g. State, USAID)
    elements of national security have grown
    increasingly out of balance
  • NDS U.S. predominance in conventional warfare is
    sustainable for the medium term

29
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Guidance
for 2008-2009
30
Three Priorities Strategic Objectives
  • (1) Defend Our Vital National Interests in the
    Broader Middle East
  • Combat operations remain the immediate priority
  • Nexus of terrorism and WMD proliferation remain
    the greatest threat to the U.S.
  • (2) Reset, Reconstitute, and Revitalize our
    Forces
  • Current operations have prevented forces from
    training for the full-spectrum of operations
  • Pace of operations continues to severely degraded
    warfighting systems, equipment, platforms, and
    people

31
Three Priorities Strategic Objectives
  • (3) Properly Balanced Global Strategic Risk
  • Remains concerned (along with COCOMs) that we
    lack the resources to meet all of our needs
  • Notes that we must maintain our strategic depth
    and sustain a high degree of readiness
    especially for the Navy and Air Force to
    deter/defeat all military threats
  • Crucial that we be alert during the
    administration transition as the national command
    authority stands up
  • Need to assess the militarys planning and
    ability to respond to issues like climate change,
    food, energy, water, and narcotics

32
Chief of Naval OperationsGuidance for 2009
33
Executing the Maritime Strategy
  • Focus Areas (continued from 2007-2008)
  • Build the Future Force
  • Maintain Warfighting Readiness
  • Develop Support our Sailors, Navy civilians and
    their families
  • 2009 Guidance Refines CNOs 18 Intentions
  • Each is restated and emphasizes how progress will
    be measured for each

34
Selected CNO Intentions for 2009
  • Build a Navy with appropriate force structure and
    strategic laydown necessary to implement the
    Maritime Strategy
  • Internal and external stakeholder understanding
    of, and support for, Navy force structure
    requirements
  • Leverage science and technology initiatives to
    ensure warfighting benefits accrue to future
    Sailors
  • Warfighting value and relevance of ST
    investments
  • Agility of ST transitions from development to
    acquisition to operation
  • Align the requirements, resources, and
    acquisition processes to achieve accountability
    and deliver the right capability and capacity on
    time and at the optimum cost throughout the
    lifecycle
  • Timely understanding of acquisition costs and
    risks

35
NETWARCOM 2009 Commanders Guidance
36
Focus Priorities
  • Anticipates greater focus on Cyber nationally,
    within DoD and within Navy
  • Priorities remain
  • (1) Generate Readiness for the Fleet and Joint
    Warfighters
  • (2) Direct/Execute Operations that Enable
    Decision Superiority
  • (3) Develop the Workforce to Meet Current and
    Future Requirements
  • (4) Deliver Capability at Best Mission Value
    Throughout the Enterprise

37
Looking to 2009
  • Start our year at a high state of network
    readiness
  • A new administration assumes the reins it is
    unclear how this will impact strategic priorities
  • The economy is in crisis, which may reduce the
    resources available to execute
  • NNFE is still required to execute efficiently and
    effectively, regardless of the environment
  • Mission remains, and is perhaps increasingly
    vital
  • Providing the Cyber capabilities that make
    Command and Control possible, enabling Decision
    Superiority

38
Warfighter Relevance
Not just another new buzzword
39
2001 Security Environment
Shifting Our Weight
Continuing the reorientation of military
capabilities and implementing enterprise-wide
reforms to ensure structures and process support
the President and the warfighter
40
2009 Hybrid Warfare Shift in Focus
41
These clean distinctions between conventional
and irregular warfare will rarely exist in
reality however, as often in the past, future
conflicts will appear as hybrids comprising
diverse, dynamic, and simultaneous combinations
of organizations, technologies, and techniques
that defy categorization. Admiral Michael
Mullen Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairmans Letter Capstone Concept for
Joint Operations January, 2009
42
Reasons for Change
  • Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
  • Repeated calls for Hybrid Warfare
  • Michèle Flournoy, nominee for USD Policy
  • Defining feature of the future security
    environment
  • Colonel Frank Hoffman, USMC (Ret.)
  • Popularized the concept in Defense circles
  • General Mattis, Commander, JFCOM
  • Called for internal conference on Hybrid Warfare

43
The choices we make will manifest themselves in
how we train, whom we promote, and, of course,
how we spend . . . we will not be able to do
everything, buy everything. And, while we have
all spoken at length about these issues, I
believe now is the time to take action. I promise
you that as long as I remain in this post I will
focus on creating a unified defense strategy that
determines our budget priorities. This is, after
all, about more than just dollars It goes to the
heart of our national security. Robert
Gates Secretary of Defense Testimony Before
the Senate Armed Services Committee 27
January 2009
44
"How about we ditch intuition and try another
approach."
45
Virtual Handouts
  • Global Trends 2025 - A Transformed World
    http//www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html
  • National Defense Strategy http//www.defenselink.
    mil/news/200820national20defense20strategy.pdf
  • Foreign Affairs A Balanced Strategy
    http//www.foreignaffairs.org/20090101faessay88103
    /robert-m-gates/how-to-reprogram-the-pentagon.html
  • Washington Quarterly The Defense Inheritance
    Challenges and Choices for the Next Pentagon
    Team http//www.twq.com/08autumn/docs/08autumn_f
    lournoy.pdf
  • Joint Forces Quarterly Hybrid Warfare and
    Challenges http//www.potomacinstitute.org/media
    /mediaclips/2009/Hoffman_JFQ_109.pdf

46
Questions/Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com