Mission Street Redevelopment District

1
Mission Street Redevelopment District
2
Improved Quality

• Mission Study Recommendations
• Sub-Districts
• Parking
• Pedestrian Bicycle Access
• Building Heights Appearance
• Mixed-Use Buildings
• Opportunities for Residential

3
Proposed District Structure

• Follow Mission/Preston example
• PUD/Conditional Rezoning District
• Conceptual Plan/Elevation
• Pre-Application Conference(s)

4
Site Photograph
5
Mission/Preston Example

• Variances
• Building Height
• Street Setbacks
• Use Residential
• Greenbelt
• Parking

6
Potential Adjustments
7
Results Oriented

• Fundamental shift in the way we look at
  development
• Greater focus on building design and form
• Flexible standards create incentives
• Examination of trade-offs in developments
• Cultivating partnerships with the development
  community
• New district is encouraged not required

8
Development Potential
9
Building MassSetback Considerations

• Relationship to design
• Reduced setbacks w/architectural features
  breaking up facades?
• Stepping facades close to the road?
• Different expectations for midblock vs.
  intersections?

10
Building MassHeight Considerations

• How tall?
• 2, 3, 4 stories? More?
• Design standards for greater height?
• Break up elevation with architectural features
  (awnings, balconies, etc.)
• Proximity to residential?
• Setbacks based on intensity of use
• Appropriate screens masonry walls, landscaping

11
Setbacks Hardscape
12
Typical Story Heights
13
Stepped Elevation
14
Examples
15
Future Zoning Considerations

• Building appearance
• Landscaping/screening
• Signs
• Pedestrian access
• Parking and loading requirements
• Access management
• Review process

16
Summary

• Incentive based district C-3 remains in place
• Partnerships between developers/property owners
  and City
• Consider interests and identify tradeoffs
• Identify policies for development

17

• Comments and questions?