Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated approach t - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated approach t

Description:

Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated approach to valuation by accounting for: ... A company could be buying earnings (AutoZone example, see next page) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Panna5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated approach t


1
Notes on Valuation Approaches
  • Summer 2009
  • Dr. Keith M. Howe
  • Scholl Professor of Finance
  • DePaul University

2
Valuation Approaches
Methodologies
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Comparable Companies Analysis
3
Discounted Cash Flows (DCF)
  • Pros
  • Widely accepted
  • Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated
    approach to valuation by accounting for
  • Profitability
  • Growth
  • Capital investment/intensity
  • Capital structure
  • Risk and opportunity cost
  • Cons
  • Generally not easy to calculate
  • Grounded by assumptions
  • Gives only an absolute valuation, which in
    isolation is not telling
  • Loaded with assumptions

4
Discounted Cash Flows (DCF)
  • A DCF model has three parts
  • Explicit forecast period
  • Cash flows are after-tax incremental cash flows
  • Continuing value or terminal period
  • Perpetuity
  • FCF, NOPLAT, NOPAT
  • Constant growth
  • Multiples
  • Discount rate
  • Discount rates can be determined a number of
    different ways (e.g., CAPM, Gordon growth model,
    APT, etc), but the expected free cash flows are
    discounted at the rate that reflects the risk of
    the cash flows.

5
How to Display a DCF- Based Model
AssumptionsExample
Here we develop a base case model from Wall
Street Research and CSFB projections
6
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation
( in millions)
(1) 2004E not included in calculating NPV of
cash flows.
( in millions)
6
7
General Thoughts on Relative Valuations
  • Most Valuations on Wall Street Use Multiples
  • Multiples reflect current market perceptions
  • Relative Valuations require fewer explicit
    assumptions and are easier to use
  • Relative valuations often find a more receptive
    audience (easier to understand as there are less
    assumptions)

8
Price/Sales
  • Pros
  • Easy to calculate
  • Maybe the only available multiple
  • Cons
  • Ignores profitability
  • Does not account for margins (Fed Ex vs. UPS) or
    taxes (PFE vs. BMY)
  • Completely ignores capital structure
  • Debt not included in the value of the firm
  • Interest costs and tax shield are ignored
  • Ignores future growth opportunities
  • Ignores capital intensity and investment

While simple Price/Sales has numerous pitfalls
users must be aware of.
9
Price/Earnings (P/E)
  • Pros
  • Most commonly used and accepted multiple with
    sell side research
  • Easy to calculate (simply need to ensure you
    match time periods, trailing, current, future)
  • Takes into account profitability
  • Cons
  • Cannot use if companies do not have accounting
    earnings
  • Are GAAP earnings a good measure of cash flow?
  • Adjustments for normalized earnings?
  • Ignores Economic Profitability
  • A company could be buying earnings (AutoZone
    example, see next page)
  • Completely ignores capital structure
  • Debt not included in the value of the firm
  • Interest costs and tax shield are ignored
  • Ignores future growth opportunities
  • Ignores capital intensity and investment

Although widely accepted, P/E has serious
drawbacks.
10
Are Autozones Investors Only Concerned With
Earnings?
Through the 90s Autozones EPS grew at a 25
CAGR.
11
Enterprise Value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
  • Pros
  • Second most commonly used and accepted multiple
    on Wall Street
  • Easy to calculate (but need to ensure you match
    time periods, trailing, current, future)
  • Takes into account profitability
  • EBITDA generally a good proxy for cash
  • Takes into account capital structure
  • Includes debt in the value of the firm (should
    use net debt)
  • Includes Interest as part of cash flow
  • Cons
  • Ignores Economic Profitability
  • Ignores capital intensity and investment

The EBITDA multiple is a cleaner multiple,
however it still misses the hurdle rate and
investment required into the business.
12
Value/Book or EV/Book
  • Important here is that Value/Book defines how
    much the market is paying
  • for past investments.
  • Pros
  • Used by Wall Street to gauge capital intensity
    and investment return
  • Easy to calculate
  • Takes into account capital structure
  • Includes debt in the value of the firm
  • Includes Interest as part of cash flow
  • Cons
  • Ignores both accounting and economic
    profitability
  • Any additional problems with these metrics?
    (Matching/timing of values)

Value/Book accounts for the investments made into
a business and its future value creation
potential. Profitability however is now ignored.
13
Implementing a Multiples Approach
  • Define the multiple
  • There are different definitions for the same
    multiple (current, trailing, forward)
  • It is integral to look at the entire distribution
    of the multiple
  • Understand the differences between the mean,
    median and standard deviation
  • Understand why the outlier are outliers (question
    relevance of the multiple and the companies
    inclusion in the peer group)
  • Understand the fundamentals of the multiple
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
    multiple

One more thing..
14
Choosing a Peer Group for Relative Valuation
Methods
  • Why are you trying to determine value?

Defining why you are performing a valuation has a
direct effect on choosing a firms peers.
15
Display Example A Valuation Perspective
P/E 2004E
Market/Book-Current
From our analysis what can you tell me about our
company?
16
Display Example Relative Valuation- Utility
Holding Companies mismatched time periods
P/E 2003(1)
EV/EBITDA 2004(2)
Market/Book
(1) Source First Call (2) Source Wall Street
Research
Errors to note here PE is 2003, EV/EBITDA is 2004
and Market to book is not label. Remember you
MUST match time periods.
17
Display Example Relative Valuation - Correct
Time Periods
P/E - 2004E
EV / 2004E EBITDA
2003 P/E
Source I/B/E/S Estimate.
Market/Book Current
Note Value-to-Cost defined as a real
market-to-book ratio. A Value-to-Cost ratio
gt1.0x implies that the market is expecting future
profitable growth from the Company. Current
value-to-cost ratio for the SP 500 1.85x.
PXs trading multiples are consistent with the
markets expectations for future performance.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com