Title: Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated approach t
1Notes on Valuation Approaches
- Summer 2009
- Dr. Keith M. Howe
- Scholl Professor of Finance
- DePaul University
2Valuation Approaches
Methodologies
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Comparable Companies Analysis
3Discounted Cash Flows (DCF)
- Pros
- Widely accepted
- Provides a generally reliable and sophisticated
approach to valuation by accounting for - Profitability
- Growth
- Capital investment/intensity
- Capital structure
- Risk and opportunity cost
- Cons
- Generally not easy to calculate
- Grounded by assumptions
- Gives only an absolute valuation, which in
isolation is not telling - Loaded with assumptions
4Discounted Cash Flows (DCF)
- A DCF model has three parts
- Explicit forecast period
- Cash flows are after-tax incremental cash flows
- Continuing value or terminal period
- Perpetuity
- FCF, NOPLAT, NOPAT
- Constant growth
- Multiples
- Discount rate
- Discount rates can be determined a number of
different ways (e.g., CAPM, Gordon growth model,
APT, etc), but the expected free cash flows are
discounted at the rate that reflects the risk of
the cash flows.
5How to Display a DCF- Based Model
AssumptionsExample
Here we develop a base case model from Wall
Street Research and CSFB projections
6Discounted Cash Flow Valuation
( in millions)
(1) 2004E not included in calculating NPV of
cash flows.
( in millions)
6
7General Thoughts on Relative Valuations
- Most Valuations on Wall Street Use Multiples
- Multiples reflect current market perceptions
- Relative Valuations require fewer explicit
assumptions and are easier to use - Relative valuations often find a more receptive
audience (easier to understand as there are less
assumptions)
8Price/Sales
- Pros
- Easy to calculate
- Maybe the only available multiple
- Cons
- Ignores profitability
- Does not account for margins (Fed Ex vs. UPS) or
taxes (PFE vs. BMY) - Completely ignores capital structure
- Debt not included in the value of the firm
- Interest costs and tax shield are ignored
- Ignores future growth opportunities
- Ignores capital intensity and investment
While simple Price/Sales has numerous pitfalls
users must be aware of.
9Price/Earnings (P/E)
- Pros
- Most commonly used and accepted multiple with
sell side research - Easy to calculate (simply need to ensure you
match time periods, trailing, current, future) - Takes into account profitability
- Cons
- Cannot use if companies do not have accounting
earnings - Are GAAP earnings a good measure of cash flow?
- Adjustments for normalized earnings?
- Ignores Economic Profitability
- A company could be buying earnings (AutoZone
example, see next page) - Completely ignores capital structure
- Debt not included in the value of the firm
- Interest costs and tax shield are ignored
- Ignores future growth opportunities
- Ignores capital intensity and investment
Although widely accepted, P/E has serious
drawbacks.
10Are Autozones Investors Only Concerned With
Earnings?
Through the 90s Autozones EPS grew at a 25
CAGR.
11Enterprise Value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Pros
- Second most commonly used and accepted multiple
on Wall Street - Easy to calculate (but need to ensure you match
time periods, trailing, current, future) - Takes into account profitability
- EBITDA generally a good proxy for cash
- Takes into account capital structure
- Includes debt in the value of the firm (should
use net debt) - Includes Interest as part of cash flow
- Cons
- Ignores Economic Profitability
- Ignores capital intensity and investment
The EBITDA multiple is a cleaner multiple,
however it still misses the hurdle rate and
investment required into the business.
12Value/Book or EV/Book
- Important here is that Value/Book defines how
much the market is paying - for past investments.
- Pros
- Used by Wall Street to gauge capital intensity
and investment return - Easy to calculate
- Takes into account capital structure
- Includes debt in the value of the firm
- Includes Interest as part of cash flow
- Cons
- Ignores both accounting and economic
profitability - Any additional problems with these metrics?
(Matching/timing of values)
Value/Book accounts for the investments made into
a business and its future value creation
potential. Profitability however is now ignored.
13Implementing a Multiples Approach
- Define the multiple
- There are different definitions for the same
multiple (current, trailing, forward) - It is integral to look at the entire distribution
of the multiple - Understand the differences between the mean,
median and standard deviation - Understand why the outlier are outliers (question
relevance of the multiple and the companies
inclusion in the peer group) - Understand the fundamentals of the multiple
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
multiple
One more thing..
14Choosing a Peer Group for Relative Valuation
Methods
- Why are you trying to determine value?
-
Defining why you are performing a valuation has a
direct effect on choosing a firms peers.
15Display Example A Valuation Perspective
P/E 2004E
Market/Book-Current
From our analysis what can you tell me about our
company?
16Display Example Relative Valuation- Utility
Holding Companies mismatched time periods
P/E 2003(1)
EV/EBITDA 2004(2)
Market/Book
(1) Source First Call (2) Source Wall Street
Research
Errors to note here PE is 2003, EV/EBITDA is 2004
and Market to book is not label. Remember you
MUST match time periods.
17Display Example Relative Valuation - Correct
Time Periods
P/E - 2004E
EV / 2004E EBITDA
2003 P/E
Source I/B/E/S Estimate.
Market/Book Current
Note Value-to-Cost defined as a real
market-to-book ratio. A Value-to-Cost ratio
gt1.0x implies that the market is expecting future
profitable growth from the Company. Current
value-to-cost ratio for the SP 500 1.85x.
PXs trading multiples are consistent with the
markets expectations for future performance.