Title: Welsh Assembly Government
1Welsh Assembly Government
Capacity Requirements to Deliver Maximum Waiting
Times Implementing Good Practice 17 November 2005
2Waiting list Model Introduction and objectives
- A robust model and a vehicle for testing outcomes
- Follows patient flows
- Driven by readily available data
- Reflects an appropriate level of detail
- Will project into future
- Reflects key policy initiatives
- Transparent with respect to key assumptions and
drivers - Allow users to engage in what-if dialogue
- Links to financial and capacity models
3Designed for life milestones
- 1a All patients seen within 12 months 2005-06
- 1b All cataract patients seen within 4 months
Mar 2006 - 1c All patients seen within 12 months for 1st
OPA Mar 2006 - 2a All angiogram patients seen within 4 months
Mar 2006 - 2b All revascularisation seen within 6 months
Mar 2006 - 3a Combined OP and IP/DC wait of max 16 months
Mar 2007 - 3b Combined OP and IP/DC wait of max 26 weeks
Mar 2009
4Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists
5Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists
6Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists
Size of list reduces as waiting times reduce
Similar principle regards reduction in numbers as
max waiting times reduce
7Waiting List Analysis
- Small number of specialties contain majority of
patients - 7 specialties account for majority of IP/DC
- Concentrate efforts on these specialties
- Additional specialties are material for OP
waiters - Again concentrate on these specialties
8Graph of IP/DC waiting List by Specialty
9Graph of OP waiting List by Specialty
10Materiality of Waiting Lists against Activity
11Methodology waiting list dynamics
- Planned vs Unplanned and Urgent vs Routine
activity - Patients flows
- Changing Models of Care
- Dynamics of the cohort model
- Referrals (i.e. underlying demand) derived from
analysis of - Activity seen
- Activity treated elsewhere
- Change in waiting lists over period
12Patients flows
13Cohort model overview (1)
14Cohort model overview (2)
15Model requirements and Data availability
- Activity analysed and modelled at patient record
level - Activity treated and Waiting lists by
- Trust and site
- Specialty
- HRG (Healthcare Resource Group at sub-specialty
level) - Includes activity undertaken at
- Welsh NHS Trusts
- English NHS Trusts (for Welsh residents)
- Private sector (under second offer scheme)
16The model key assumptions and drivers
- Demography and other change factors
- Waiting time targets and list management
- Urgent vs routine activity
- Outpatient conversion rates
- Removals other Than Treatment (RoTT) rates
- Performance
17Key driver 1 Demography and other factors
- Change factors implemented in baseline
projections - Current volume and profile of activity
- Future impact of demographic change
- Other change factors supported by model (for
sensitivity and what-if testing) - Morbidity and equity
- Medical technology and pharmacology
- Social, economic and political
- Evidence base
- Change factors by Region, LHB, Specialty and HRG
18Key driver 2 Maximum waiting time targets
- Waiting time targets
- Profiling between targets
- Headroom and impact of breaches
- PTL slippage (Primary Targeting of Lists)
19Key driver 2 Maximum waiting time targets
20Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
- Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
urgent - Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
timely fashion as soon as possible but not
taking precedence over patients waiting longer
for the same procedures - Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
from - historic data
- discussion with clinicians
21Key driver 4 Conversion rates
- The likelihood of an outpatient referral
requiring an inpatient or day case admission - Is not the ratio of OP activity to IP/DC activity
in any period - Modelled as the ratio of OP activity seen to
IP/DC referrals - Alternative statistical models available
- Rates likely to increase as WTs fall and GPSIs
impact on GP referral patterns and overall OP
referral rates fall
22Key driver 5 RoTT rates
- Removals from list for Reasons other Than
Treatment - Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
- Impact can be significant
- Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
- Need to predict future not replicate past
performance - Model moves from current to long term lower
targets
23Model Outputs
- Activity referred, RoTT and seen / treated by
period - Waiting list profile at end of period
- Activity shown by
- Trust
- Specialty
- OP, IP and DC
- HRG
- Selected outputs for Orthopaedics
24Output Treatments required by year
25Output Treatments required by year
26Output Treatments required by year
27Output Treatments required by year
28Activity Performance and Capacity Issues
- Activity performance by Trust, Specialty and HRG
- Capacity requirements
- Meeting the targets ring-fencing resources
- Financial vs Physical capacity
29Waiting list Model Summary
- A robust model and vehicle for testing
- Follows patient flows
- Driven by readily available data
- Will project into future
- Reflect key policy initiatives
- Transparent with respect to key assumptions and
drivers - Allow users to engage in what-if dialogue
- Links to financial and capacity models
- Reflects an appropriate level of detail
30 31Waiting lists Scoping the problem
- Waiting list analysis
- Review of shifts over 2-year period
- Identify list by strata
- Effect of previous reductions in waiting times
- Analysis available by Trust and specialty
32Input Maximum waiting times
33Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)
34Input Conversion rates
35Input RoTT rates
36Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
- Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
urgent - Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
timely fashion as soon as possible but not
taking precedence over patients waiting longer
for the same procedures - Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
from - historic data
- discussion with clinicians
37Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)
38Input Conversion rates
39Key driver 5 RoTT rates
- Removals from list for Reasons other Than
Treatment - Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
- Impact can be significant
- Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
- Need to predict future not replicate past
performance - Model moves from current to long term lower
targets
40Input RoTT rates
41Output Treatments required by year
42Conversion Rates
- Detailed OP data available for 2004-05 12
months only - Mapping of individual OP first attendance against
corresponding IP episode - Assume all conversions occurred after 18 months
wait - Regression analysis to extrapolate actual
conversions between 1 month and 12 months out to
18 months - Generally high correlation of regression
- Extrapolated conversions by Trust for WL top 7
specialties - Conversion rates for other minor/immaterial
specialties supplied from Checklist overarching
conversion rates
43Examples of conversion regression
44Examples of conversion regression
45Examples of conversion regression
46Examples of conversion regression
47Links to Other Work
- Capacity model identifies gap between current
activity and that required to achieve targets - Capacity assumed as 2004-05 funded activity less
second offer scheme additions - Financial model based on costing the gap between
funded and required activity - Trust average specialty costs used as basis for
additional activity undertaken within NHS Wales - Capacity required over NHS availability costed at
private sector rates for two years, then at avge
specialty cost - Costing completed for TO, indicating a financial
outturn similar to earlier estimates
48Appendices
- Appendix 1 High level model structure
- Appendix 2 Demand profiles
49Appendix 1 - High level model structure (1)
50Appendix 1 - High level model structure (2)
51Appendix 2 Demand profiles
52 53Waiting list Model Agenda
- Objectives of the study
- Waiting lists scoping the problem
- Methodology waiting list dynamics
- Data requirements and availability
- The model key assumptions and drivers
- Performance and capacity requirements
- Summary
54Waiting List Analysis (1)
- Review of shifts in overall waiting lists over a
two year period - Identify waiting lists by strata of waiting
times - Note the effect of previous reductions in maximum
waiting times - Analysis capable by Trust by Specialty
55Waiting lists Scoping the problem
- Waiting list analysis
- Review of shifts over 2-year period
- Identify list by strata
- Effect of previous reductions in waiting times
- Analysis available by Trust and specialty
56Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)
57Input Conversion rates
58Input RoTT rates
59Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
- Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
urgent - Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
timely fashion as soon as possible but not
taking precedence over patients waiting longer
for the same procedures - Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
from - historic data
- discussion with clinicians
60Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)
61Input Conversion rates
62Key driver 5 RoTT rates
- Removals from list for Reasons other Than
Treatment - Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
- Impact can be significant
- Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
- Need to predict future not replicate past
performance - Model moves from current to long term lower
targets
63Input RoTT rates
64Output Treatments required by year
65Conversion Rates
- Detailed OP data available for 2004-05 12
months only - Mapping of individual OP first attendance against
corresponding IP episode - Assume all conversions occurred after 18 months
wait - Regression analysis to extrapolate actual
conversions between 1 month and 12 months out to
18 months - Generally high correlation of regression
- Extrapolated conversions by Trust for WL top 7
specialties - Conversion rates for other minor/immaterial
specialties supplied from Checklist overarching
conversion rates
66Examples of conversion regression
67Examples of conversion regression
68Examples of conversion regression
69Waiting List Analysis (1)
- Review of shifts in overall waiting lists over a
two year period - Identify waiting lists by strata of waiting
times - Note the effect of previous reductions in maximum
waiting times - Analysis capable by Trust by Specialty