Welsh Assembly Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Welsh Assembly Government

Description:

A robust model and a vehicle for testing outcomes. Follows patient flows ... 2a All angiogram patients seen within 4 months Mar 2006 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: paulwhit
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welsh Assembly Government


1
Welsh Assembly Government
Capacity Requirements to Deliver Maximum Waiting
Times Implementing Good Practice 17 November 2005
2
Waiting list Model Introduction and objectives
  • A robust model and a vehicle for testing outcomes
  • Follows patient flows
  • Driven by readily available data
  • Reflects an appropriate level of detail
  • Will project into future
  • Reflects key policy initiatives
  • Transparent with respect to key assumptions and
    drivers
  • Allow users to engage in what-if dialogue
  • Links to financial and capacity models


3
Designed for life milestones
  • 1a All patients seen within 12 months 2005-06
  • 1b All cataract patients seen within 4 months
    Mar 2006
  • 1c All patients seen within 12 months for 1st
    OPA Mar 2006
  • 2a All angiogram patients seen within 4 months
    Mar 2006
  • 2b All revascularisation seen within 6 months
    Mar 2006
  • 3a Combined OP and IP/DC wait of max 16 months
    Mar 2007
  • 3b Combined OP and IP/DC wait of max 26 weeks
    Mar 2009


4
Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists

5
Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists

6
Graph of All Wales Waiting Lists

Size of list reduces as waiting times reduce
Similar principle regards reduction in numbers as
max waiting times reduce
7
Waiting List Analysis
  • Small number of specialties contain majority of
    patients
  • 7 specialties account for majority of IP/DC
  • Concentrate efforts on these specialties
  • Additional specialties are material for OP
    waiters
  • Again concentrate on these specialties


8
Graph of IP/DC waiting List by Specialty

9
Graph of OP waiting List by Specialty

10
Materiality of Waiting Lists against Activity

11
Methodology waiting list dynamics
  • Planned vs Unplanned and Urgent vs Routine
    activity
  • Patients flows
  • Changing Models of Care
  • Dynamics of the cohort model
  • Referrals (i.e. underlying demand) derived from
    analysis of
  • Activity seen
  • Activity treated elsewhere
  • Change in waiting lists over period


12
Patients flows

13
Cohort model overview (1)

14
Cohort model overview (2)

15
Model requirements and Data availability
  • Activity analysed and modelled at patient record
    level
  • Activity treated and Waiting lists by
  • Trust and site
  • Specialty
  • HRG (Healthcare Resource Group at sub-specialty
    level)
  • Includes activity undertaken at
  • Welsh NHS Trusts
  • English NHS Trusts (for Welsh residents)
  • Private sector (under second offer scheme)


16
The model key assumptions and drivers
  • Demography and other change factors
  • Waiting time targets and list management
  • Urgent vs routine activity
  • Outpatient conversion rates
  • Removals other Than Treatment (RoTT) rates
  • Performance


17
Key driver 1 Demography and other factors
  • Change factors implemented in baseline
    projections
  • Current volume and profile of activity
  • Future impact of demographic change
  • Other change factors supported by model (for
    sensitivity and what-if testing)
  • Morbidity and equity
  • Medical technology and pharmacology
  • Social, economic and political
  • Evidence base
  • Change factors by Region, LHB, Specialty and HRG


18
Key driver 2 Maximum waiting time targets
  • Waiting time targets
  • Profiling between targets
  • Headroom and impact of breaches
  • PTL slippage (Primary Targeting of Lists)


19
Key driver 2 Maximum waiting time targets

20
Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
  • Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
    urgent
  • Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
    timely fashion as soon as possible but not
    taking precedence over patients waiting longer
    for the same procedures
  • Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
    from
  • historic data
  • discussion with clinicians


21
Key driver 4 Conversion rates
  • The likelihood of an outpatient referral
    requiring an inpatient or day case admission
  • Is not the ratio of OP activity to IP/DC activity
    in any period
  • Modelled as the ratio of OP activity seen to
    IP/DC referrals
  • Alternative statistical models available
  • Rates likely to increase as WTs fall and GPSIs
    impact on GP referral patterns and overall OP
    referral rates fall


22
Key driver 5 RoTT rates
  • Removals from list for Reasons other Than
    Treatment
  • Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
  • Impact can be significant
  • Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
  • Need to predict future not replicate past
    performance
  • Model moves from current to long term lower
    targets


23
Model Outputs
  • Activity referred, RoTT and seen / treated by
    period
  • Waiting list profile at end of period
  • Activity shown by
  • Trust
  • Specialty
  • OP, IP and DC
  • HRG
  • Selected outputs for Orthopaedics


24
Output Treatments required by year

25
Output Treatments required by year

26
Output Treatments required by year

27
Output Treatments required by year

28
Activity Performance and Capacity Issues
  • Activity performance by Trust, Specialty and HRG
  • Capacity requirements
  • Meeting the targets ring-fencing resources
  • Financial vs Physical capacity


29
Waiting list Model Summary
  • A robust model and vehicle for testing
  • Follows patient flows
  • Driven by readily available data
  • Will project into future
  • Reflect key policy initiatives
  • Transparent with respect to key assumptions and
    drivers
  • Allow users to engage in what-if dialogue
  • Links to financial and capacity models
  • Reflects an appropriate level of detail


30

31
Waiting lists Scoping the problem
  • Waiting list analysis
  • Review of shifts over 2-year period
  • Identify list by strata
  • Effect of previous reductions in waiting times
  • Analysis available by Trust and specialty


32
Input Maximum waiting times

33
Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)

34
Input Conversion rates

35
Input RoTT rates

36
Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
  • Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
    urgent
  • Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
    timely fashion as soon as possible but not
    taking precedence over patients waiting longer
    for the same procedures
  • Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
    from
  • historic data
  • discussion with clinicians


37
Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)

38
Input Conversion rates

39
Key driver 5 RoTT rates
  • Removals from list for Reasons other Than
    Treatment
  • Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
  • Impact can be significant
  • Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
  • Need to predict future not replicate past
    performance
  • Model moves from current to long term lower
    targets


40
Input RoTT rates

41
Output Treatments required by year

42
Conversion Rates
  • Detailed OP data available for 2004-05 12
    months only
  • Mapping of individual OP first attendance against
    corresponding IP episode
  • Assume all conversions occurred after 18 months
    wait
  • Regression analysis to extrapolate actual
    conversions between 1 month and 12 months out to
    18 months
  • Generally high correlation of regression
  • Extrapolated conversions by Trust for WL top 7
    specialties
  • Conversion rates for other minor/immaterial
    specialties supplied from Checklist overarching
    conversion rates


43
Examples of conversion regression

44
Examples of conversion regression

45
Examples of conversion regression

46
Examples of conversion regression

47
Links to Other Work
  • Capacity model identifies gap between current
    activity and that required to achieve targets
  • Capacity assumed as 2004-05 funded activity less
    second offer scheme additions
  • Financial model based on costing the gap between
    funded and required activity
  • Trust average specialty costs used as basis for
    additional activity undertaken within NHS Wales
  • Capacity required over NHS availability costed at
    private sector rates for two years, then at avge
    specialty cost
  • Costing completed for TO, indicating a financial
    outturn similar to earlier estimates


48
Appendices
  • Appendix 1 High level model structure
  • Appendix 2 Demand profiles


49
Appendix 1 - High level model structure (1)

50
Appendix 1 - High level model structure (2)

51
Appendix 2 Demand profiles

52

53
Waiting list Model Agenda
  • Objectives of the study
  • Waiting lists scoping the problem
  • Methodology waiting list dynamics
  • Data requirements and availability
  • The model key assumptions and drivers
  • Performance and capacity requirements
  • Summary


54
Waiting List Analysis (1)
  • Review of shifts in overall waiting lists over a
    two year period
  • Identify waiting lists by strata of waiting
    times
  • Note the effect of previous reductions in maximum
    waiting times
  • Analysis capable by Trust by Specialty


55
Waiting lists Scoping the problem
  • Waiting list analysis
  • Review of shifts over 2-year period
  • Identify list by strata
  • Effect of previous reductions in waiting times
  • Analysis available by Trust and specialty


56
Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)

57
Input Conversion rates

58
Input RoTT rates

59
Key driver 3 Urgent vs Routine Activity
  • Urgents planned activity regarded as clinically
    urgent
  • Routines planned activity to be undertaken in a
    timely fashion as soon as possible but not
    taking precedence over patients waiting longer
    for the same procedures
  • Poor recording in datasets but can be identified
    from
  • historic data
  • discussion with clinicians


60
Input Urgent referrals (as of new referrals)

61
Input Conversion rates

62
Key driver 5 RoTT rates
  • Removals from list for Reasons other Than
    Treatment
  • Variety of reasons for RoTT rates
  • Impact can be significant
  • Clear time dimension short WT lead to low RoTT
  • Need to predict future not replicate past
    performance
  • Model moves from current to long term lower
    targets


63
Input RoTT rates

64
Output Treatments required by year

65
Conversion Rates
  • Detailed OP data available for 2004-05 12
    months only
  • Mapping of individual OP first attendance against
    corresponding IP episode
  • Assume all conversions occurred after 18 months
    wait
  • Regression analysis to extrapolate actual
    conversions between 1 month and 12 months out to
    18 months
  • Generally high correlation of regression
  • Extrapolated conversions by Trust for WL top 7
    specialties
  • Conversion rates for other minor/immaterial
    specialties supplied from Checklist overarching
    conversion rates


66
Examples of conversion regression

67
Examples of conversion regression

68
Examples of conversion regression

69
Waiting List Analysis (1)
  • Review of shifts in overall waiting lists over a
    two year period
  • Identify waiting lists by strata of waiting
    times
  • Note the effect of previous reductions in maximum
    waiting times
  • Analysis capable by Trust by Specialty

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com