Masking Demonstration Assignment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Masking Demonstration Assignment

Description:

... the effects of practice on the naming of ink colors of incompatible words over 8 days. Interference from incompatible words appeared to decrease with practice. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: psyc95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Masking Demonstration Assignment


1
Masking Demonstration Assignment
2
Things you may have missed
  • Should have mentioned
  • -What was the question asked in the study?
  • - Assumptions of the statistical tests (normal
    distribution, etc)
  • - Relative power of the test

3
Things you may have missed
  • Results should have included
  • -descriptive statistics (means)
  • -inferential statistics (t-values, p-values)
  • Also should have tied the results to the
    theoretical constructs (iconic memory)

4
Things you may have missed
  • Paired t-test
  • -Assumptions sampling distribution of mean D is
    normally distributed, or if the raw scores are
    normally distributed.
  • - scores have to be on an interval or ratio
    scale.
  • Most powerful of the tests.

5
Things you may have missed
  • Sign Test is an alternative
  • - Assumes discreet values for the scores
  • Other possible answers
  • Wilcoxin for between-groups
  • Chi-square

6
Which takes longer to say aloud?
Apple
or
7
J. M. Cattell (1886)
  • Cattell reported that objects (and colors) take
    longer to name aloud than the corresponding words
    take to read aloud.

8
J. M. Cattell (1886)
  • This is because, in the case of words and
    letters, the association between the idea and
    name has taken place so often that the process
    has become automatic, whereas in the case of
    colors and pictures we must by a voluntary effort
    choose the name (Cattell, 1886 p. 65)

9
Other support for differential practice
explanation
  • Children younger than reading age, but who knew
    the words for the colors used, were faster on
    color naming than word reading

10
J. R. Stroop (1935)
  • Interested in how best to explain interference.
  • Was doing studies (similar to Cattells) looking
    at color naming versus word reading when he got
    the bright idea to combine the two attributes
    into a single stimulus.

11
Stroops Primary Questions
  • What effect does the word have on trying to name
    the color and what effect does the color have on
    trying to say the word?
  • What effect does practice have on the observed
    interference?

12
Stroops Experiment 1
  • Examined the effect of incompatible ink colors on
    reading words aloud.
  • 2 conditions in which read word
  • Experimental words in each of 4 other colors
  • Control words printed in black
  • No differences between the 2 conditions in RT so
    no interference of color on reading words

13
Stroops Experiment 2
  • Examined the effects of words when naming colors
  • 2 conditions in which named color
  • Experimental words in each of other 4 colors
  • Control color blocks
  • RT to name ink colors of incongruent words took
    longer than solid-color squares suggesting a
    significant interference effect.

14
Stroops Experiment 3
  • Examined the effects of practice on the naming of
    ink colors of incompatible words over 8 days
  • Interference from incompatible words appeared to
    decrease with practice.
  • Additionally, all this practice resulted in a
    temporary interference of incompatible ink colors
    when reading words (reverse Stroop effect)

15
Stroops Conclusion
  • A marked interference occurs when naming ink
    colors of incompatible color words.
  • This interference may be the result of
    differences in the strengths of associations
    formed due to training levels in the two
    activities.

16
Current form of Stroop Task
  • Two conditions
  • Ink color and Word color are congruent RED
  • Ink color and Word color are incongruent RED
  • Two Tasks
  • Name ink color
  • Name word

17
Conceptual Encoding Theory
  • Seymours (1977) theory states that a color word
    stimulus activates two conceptual codes in
    semantic memory.
  • One corresponds to the color of the word (word
    memory), and
  • the other to the color denoted by the word (color
    memory).

18
Conceptual Encoding Theory
  • The time to access the word memory is shorter
    than the time to access the color memory and
    transfer that information into the word.
  • Hence, when naming a word, there is no
    interference from the ink color because it is
    still processing.
  • But when you name the ink color, the word has
    already been processed so you have to choose
    between two answers resulting in longer RTs.

19
Conceptual Coding Theory
dog green red cat keyboard
RED GREEN BLUE PURPLE PINK
GREEN
BLUE
PURPLE
RED
PINK
Word Memory
Color Memory
20
Conceptual Encoding Theory
Incoming Stimulus
Green

Word Memory
Color Memory
21
Conceptual Encoding Theory
Green

Word
Color
Word Memory
Color Memory
22
Conceptual Encoding Theory
Green

Green
Word Memory
Color Memory
23
Conceptual Encoding Theory
  • Which stimuli will take you longer to name the
    color of the ink?
  • RED BLOOD
  • This theory hypothesizes that it is more
    difficult to say the ink color of a word when the
    word itself names a color.

24
In closing...
  • Although the differential practice theory is
    commonly cited, to date there is no truly
    adequate explanation as to why the Stroop effect
    exists.
  • The case remains a mystery...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com