U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Description:

New Homes & Home Improvement. Home Energy Rating System. Commercial Buildings ... Home builders. Industrial/Manufacturers. Retailers. Service & Product Providers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Owne699
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY


1
Are We There Yet? Energy Targets 2005 USGBC
GreenBuild Conference 10 November 2005
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2
Agenda
  • Are We There Yet?
  • Why Energy Performance?
  • Performance Rating Systems
  • Codes and Performance
  • Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR
  • The ENERGY STAR Challenge
  • Tools of the Trade
  • ENERGY STAR
  • EPA Energy Performance Rating System
  • LEED Rating System
  • Recognition
  • DEMO

3
Are WE There Yet?
  • New Construction Energy Performance Must Be
    Modeled/Simulated/Calculated
  • no energy bills before a building is constructed
    and occupied
  • energy performance is calculated/simulated
  • Simulation may, or may not, fit with eventual
    reality

4
Are WE There Yet?
  • Difficult to Predicting Building Energy Uses
  • Human behavior
  • Change in business function
  • Plug loads
  • New technologies
  • No real life data

5
Are WE There Yet?
  • Energy Modeling and Simulation
  • Modeling tools are difficult to master
  • Limited in what they can do
  • Based on assumptions and data inputs
  • Time consuming to transfer data from drawings to
    software
  • Modelers not held accountable for energy savings

6
Are WE There Yet?
  • The Feedback Loop
  • Monitoring end uses of occupied building
  • Check whether energy goals were met
  • Feedback provided by monitoring will help ensure
    the efficient performance of systems
  • Use consistent metric for intended and operating
    performance
  • Use benchmark based performance targets and
    compare to actual performance

7
Why Energy Performance?
  • Commercial buildings are big contributors to
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • peak electricity demand
  • natural gas demand
  • Many cost-effective improvements
  • efficient building uses 40 less than average
    buildings
  • paybacks of less than 3 to 5 years
  • Provide leadership for targeting/measuring/promoti
    ng building energy efficiency
  • Design to operations

8
Why Energy Performance?
  • Electricity blackouts
  • Natural gas shortages/costs
  • Global warming
  • Prevent greenhouse gas emissions
  • Oil imports/prices
  • Environmental stewardship
  • Cost savings for clients

In 2003, Americans with the help of ENERGY STAR
saved enough energy to power about 20 million
homes.
9
Major Players
  • USGBC LEED
  • provides points for beating code
  • prereq only require meeting ASHRAE 90.1 or local
    code
  • 17 out of possible 69 points for EA credit
  • comprehensive building rating
  • Utility programs
  • traditionally reward putting widgets in buildings
    and beating code
  • some piloting EPA rating system
  • ENERGY STAR
  • requires energy performance in the top 25
  • same rating scale for design and operating
    buildings

10
New Approach
  • Whole Building Performance
  • promotes integrated systems and design
  • about energy savings -- not presence of new
    technology
  • achieve twice the savings for a given investment
  • Performance Measurement System
  • provide definitive metric design and operating
    buildings
  • fix missing market information
  • how to measure efficiency / performance
  • How to set realistic targets
  • provide information linked to real market
    transactions
  • (energy bills, actual energy consumption data)
  • Leadership in the market place
  • overcome confusion over role of codes
  • make utility programs more robust
  • drive green building programs

11
Predicted Performance
Source NBI, California Board for Energy
Efficiency, EPA
12
Energy Codes
  • Codes set minimum and prescriptive approach
  • BUT many link efficiency to beating code
  • AND buildings can beat code (10, 20, 30) and not
    perform as intended
  • Code-Based Systems
  • about components
  • ignore site/orientation, fuel
  • choice, HVAC choice
  • Issues
  • good design choices not rewarded
  • customer does not see benefits of efficiency

20 better than code
10 better than code
Energy Use
13
EPA Performance Rating Systems
Is 65.7 kBtu/sf/yr high or low for a building?
EPA Energy Performance Rating
Fuel Efficiency Rating MPG
Is 10 MPG high or low for an automobile?
14
EPA Energy Performance Rating
  • Measures efficiency on a 1 100 scale
  • Based on actual energy consumption -- energy
    bills
  • Normalizes building energy consumption weather,
    hours, occupant density, plug load (for existing
    buildings)
  • Benchmarks against similar buildings in national
    stock
  • Can use to establish energy target building
    design
  • Defines efficiency -- score of 75 or better
  • Top 25 qualify for ENERGY STAR label or
    Designed to Earn ENERGY STAR
  • Verified by PE/AOR

15
ENERGY STAR Overview
  • Qualified Products
  • Consumer products
  • Commercial building products
  • New Homes Home Improvement
  • Home Energy Rating System
  • Commercial Buildings
  • EPA Energy Performance Rating
  • Designed to Earn ENERGY STAR design projects
  • Labels existing buildings

To date, American consumers have purchased more
than one billion ENERGY STAR qualified products,
which have helped reduce greenhouse gas emissions
by more than 485 billion pounds.
16
Are Your Projects
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
17
The Challenge
  • Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR Deliver
    Building Designs with Superior Energy Efficiency
  • What Promote greater efficiency in commercial
    building designs
  • Why Design matters in delivering buildings that
    can reduce Greenhouse gas emissions
  • How ENERGY STAR national platform
  • Business Challenge
  • Strategic A/E partners
  • Benefits Promotes integrated design deliver
    top performance

18
Design Process
19
Design Projects
  • Achieve of rating 75 or higher
  • Architect of Record submit Design Intent to EPA
  • Display the Designed to Earn the ENERGY STAR
    graphic
  • Earn EPA recognition for A/E Firms

20
Design Projects
  • Statement of Energy Design Intent
  • Documents performance
  • Design and ENERGY STAR
  • EPA Rating
  • Energy Performance Rating
  • Total annual energy use (kBtu/sf/yr)
  • Total annual energy cost
  • Greenhouse gas emissions

21
Design Projects
22
ENERGY STAR makes it easy
  • Establish a benchmark-based target
  • Document energy design that meet
  • superior performance criteria
  • Associate designs with nationally
  • recognized symbol for energy efficiency
  • Determine if operating building achieves
  • superior energy performance
  • Compare actual building performance
  • to design intent

23
TOOLS of the TRADE
  • ENERGY STAR
  • Energy Performance Rating
  • LEED Rating System

24
EPAs Target Finder
Architects and engineers working on the project
have reported that the benchmark-based
performance targets are effective in fostering
high-efficiency design. (Daly 2002, Davis 2002)
25
Target Finder
  • EPA tool for new construction Target Finder
  • uses the EPA Energy Performance Rating
  • determine an annual energy target
  • building design
  • compare energy use from
  • calculations with your target
  • monitor your design's energy
  • performance as design progress
  • Compare energy costs of
  • many design strategies

26
EPAs Portfolio Manager
27
EPAs Portfolio Manager
  • Existing buildings (utility data)
  • Rating tool Portfolio Manager
  • Benchmark energy performance
  • Normalizes for factors that affect energy use
    intensity
  • Data source DOE-CBECS
  • Provides GHG reductions
  • Energy costs savings

28
LEED ENERGY STAR
  • LEED NC v.2.2 will require consumption target
  • Not a credit award but a submittal requirement to
    document intent SEDI
  • LEED EB and EPA Energy Performance Rating

Prerequisite Rating 60
29
Recognition
  • DESIGNS
  • LEADERS
  • LABELS

30
LEADERS in the Challenge
  • Associations
  • Alliance to Save Energy (ASE)
  • American Hotel Lodging Association (AHLA)
  • American Society for Healthcare Engineering of
    the American Hospital Association (ASHE)
  • Association of Energy Engineers
  • Association of School Business Officials
    International (ASBO)
  • Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA)
  • California State Teachers' Retirement System
    (CalSTRS)
  • Council of Educational Facility Planners
    International (CEFPI)
  • Council of Great City Schools
  • Delaware
  • Efficiency Vermont
  • Food Marketing Institute (FMI)
  • Institute for Sustainable Energy
  • Illinois
  • Maine
  • National Association of Counties (NACo)
  • National Association of Energy Service Companies
    (NAESCO)
  • Partners
  • The 2004 ENERGY STAR Leaders include the
    following organizations
  • Achieving a 10-point improvement portfolio-wide
  • Colorado Springs School District 11-Colorado
    Springs, CO
  • The Vanguard Group-Valley Forge, PA
  • Achieving a 20-point improvement portfolio-wide
  • Cambridge Savings Bank-Cambridge, MA
  • Achieving an average portfolio-wide rating of 75
    or better
  • Cambridge Savings Bank-Cambridge, MA
  • Columbus Hospitality-Columbus, OH
  • Food Lion-Salisbury, NC
  • Giant Eagle-Pittsburgh, PA
  • Granite Properties-Plano, TX
  • HE Butt Grocery Company-San Antonio, TX
  • USAA Real Estate Company-San Antonio, TX
  • Completing the portfolio-wide baseline
  • Academy School District 20-Colorado Springs, CO
  • Douglas, Emmett Company-Los Angeles, CA

31
Architecture Engineering Firms
Innovative Design Krueck Sexton Pearce
Brinkley Cease Lee RBB Architects Small Kane
Architects Alicia Ravetto Architects EMC
Engineers
32
Designed to Earn
Guilford Northern Middle School Greensboro, NC
33
Commercial Buildings Rated
34
Good Business
  • TIAA-CREF
  • Largest private employee pension fund in the
    world
  • Since 2003, require property managers to use EPA
    performance rating for investment properties
  • Morgan Stanley (Lend Lease)
  • Largest U.S. real estate asset management company
  • Since 2003, require property managers to use EPA
    performance rating for investment properties
  • CA Teachers Retirement System
  • 3rd largest public employee pension fund in U.S.
  • As of Jan 2005, require property managers to use
    EPA performance rating for investment properties
  • Investment Fund Managers
  • 10 funds, with 215 B under management, have
    endorsed ENERGY STAR
  • Recognize ENERGY STAR participation as a best in
    class management practice
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Reducing energy use by 30 is like increasing NOI
    and building asset value by 5
  • Hospitality (4 billion in energy costs per year)
  • 10 energy savings is like a 1.35 ADR increase
    for a full service hotel

35
Join
  • Building owners/developers
  • Home builders
  • Industrial/Manufacturers
  • Retailers
  • Service Product Providers
  • Architects Engineers
  • Utilities Energy Efficiency Sponsors

36
If its not energy efficient
Economic success and environmental protection go
hand in hand. The steps we are taking today will
ensure a cleaner environment and a brighter
future for generations to come. - Governor Mitt
Romney (Massachusetts)
its not sustainable.
37
  • Contact Information
  • Karen P. Butler, U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR
  • butler.karen_at_epa.gov
  • 202.343.9717
  • Steve Jurovics, Ph.D., LEED AP (EPA Contractor)
  • sjurovics_at_cadmusgroup.com
  • 919.403.5104
  • Gail Lindsey, FAIA, LEED AP (EPA Contractor)
  • glindsey_at_direcway.com

ENERGY STAR Hotline 1 888 STAR YES
(1.888.782.7937) New Building Design Webpage
www.energystar.gov/newbuildingdesign
38
  • Target Finder Demo

39
Tools Resources
40
Tools Resources
72
430
50000
450
41
Tools Resources
.07
.80
42
Tools Resources
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
43
Tools Resources
44
Tools Resources
.07
1087656
.80
15909
45
Tools Resources
Cost Difference 17,989 Energy Difference
1,072,509 kBtu
46
Tools Resources
47
Tools Resources
  • Statement of Energy Design Intent
  • Documents performance
  • Design and ENERGY STAR
  • EPA Rating
  • Energy Performance Rating
  • Total annual energy use (kBtu/sf/yr)
  • Total annual energy cost
  • Greenhouse gas emissions

48
(No Transcript)
49
Why Energy Performance?
Greenhouse Gases and Buildings
Data source AEO, 2004
50
Why Energy Performance?
Electricity and Buildings
Electricity Sales by Sector
(3,312 B KWh)
100
100
Transport/
90
90
Other
80
3
80
70
70
60
60

Residential
50
50
Commercial
35
40
40
30
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
Commercial End-Use
Residential End-Use
Cooling
Other Appliances Lighting
Lighting
Air Conditioning
Office Equipment
Space Heating
Other
Water Heating
Industrial
Refrigeration
32
Ventilation
Space Heating
1999
Cooking
Data source EIA, CBECS
Water Heating
51
Why Energy Performance?
Peak Electricity and Buildings
Data source California
52
Why Energy Performance?
Natural Gas Use and Buildings
100
100
90
90
Other
80
80
29
70
70
60

60
50
Residential
50

40
21
Commercial
40
30
30
14
20
20
10
10
0
0
Residential End-Use
Commercial End-Use
Space Heating
Space Heating
Industrial
Water Heating
Water Heating
36
Other Appliances Lighting
Cooking
Other
Cooling
Data source EIA, CBECS
53
Peak Natural Gas and Buildings
Why Energy Performance?
  • Commercial Buildings
  • 30 of peak demand

Data source EIA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com