Ethics in Behavioral Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics in Behavioral Research

Description:

Professional organizations publish guidelines and procedures to ... A human endeavor. Ethical Decision-Making. Difficult questions called 'ethical dilemmas' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: psyc6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics in Behavioral Research


1
Ethics in Behavioral Research
  • so you need permission?

2
Ethical Standards for Professionals
  • Professional organizations publish guidelines and
    procedures to help insure ethical conduct of
    members.
  • Ethical guidelines for psychologists are
    published by the American Psychological
    Association (APA).
  • Guidelines for clinicians
  • Guidelines for researchers

3
Ethics the Study of Proper ActionThe APA Ethics
Code concerns
  • The responsibility researchers have to protect
    participants (subjects)
  • to be honest to participants
  • to protect their safety
  • The responsibility to uphold scientific values in
    reporting their findings.
  • Responsibility always lies with the researcher.

4
APA Code of Ethics
  • First published in 1953.
  • Current version published 2003.
  • Provides guidelines for all aspects of
    psychologists work.
  • Section 8 deals with ethics in research.
  • View the standards at www.APA.org/ethics

5
Why are Ethical Standards Needed in Research?
  • Aspects of the research situation.
  • The issue of power.
  • Pressures affecting the
  • researcher.
  • A human endeavor.

6
Ethical Decision-Making
  • Difficult questions called ethical dilemmas.
  • Lack of clear-cut answers.
  • A subjective process peoples judgments.
  • Working with a set of guidelines.
  • Best resolved through discussion.

7
The Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  • A committee of scientists nonscientists that
    reviews all research proposals at an institution.
  • 1974 National Research Act requires IRB review of
    every study.
  • US Dept. of Health Human Services requires
    review of all human-participant research.

8
Function of the IRB
  • Evaluates the risk/benefit ratio Is it worth
    it?
  • Relies on subjective evaluation (through
    discussion) of the costs benefits to society,
    to the individual.

9
Six Key Issues Discussed by the IRB
  • Principle of Informed Consent
  • Invasion of Privacy
  • Coercion to participate
  • Potential physical or mental harm
  • Deception
  • Violation of confidentiality

10
Three Core Ethical Principles
  • The Principle of No Harm
  • The Principle of Informed Consent
  • The Principle of Confidentiality

11
The Principle of No Harm
  • Types of risk to participants.
  • How much risk is acceptable?

12
Principle of No Harm
13
The Standard of Minimal Risk
  • When the risks involved in participation in the
    study are NO GREATER THAN those faced in everyday
    life.
  • This concept is used as the standard for what
    level of risk is acceptable.
  • If the risk is judged to exceed minimal risk,
    additional safeguards will be required for the
    research to go forward.

14
The Risk-Benefit Ratio
  • When is risk to participants justified?
  • The risks to subjects (participants) are weighed
    against the potential benefit of the research to
    society.
  • The only way a study that involves risk to
    subjects can go forward is to pass this test.

15
Do the benefits expected from this study
outweigh the potential costs?
  • A study with limited benefits to society warrants
    only minimal risk to participants.
  • A study with potentially important results may
    merit placing participants at greater risk of
    potential harm.
  • Weighing risks and benefits
  • The work of the IRB
  • Committee

16
The Principle of Informed Consent
  • Protecting Participants

17
Informed Consent
  • A researcher must fully inform or make clear
    to the participant what the research entails,
    including their rights.
  • What to expect during participation
  • Anything that might influence willingness to
    participate
  • Any possible risk involved

18
Informed Consent (cont.)
  • Subjects may not be coerced into participating.
  • They are given access to the researcher for
    questions.
  • They are told that they can end their
    participation at any time.
  • Participants dignity and rights must be
    respected.

19
Can all potential subjects give informed
consent for participation in research?
20
Deception
  • When information about the true nature of the
    research is withheld from participants.
  • Used when disclosing the true nature of the
    study would invalidate the results.
  • May involve the use of confederates.
  • Deception contradicts informed consent.

21
Restrictions on the Use of Deception
  • Deception is not permitted if risk to
    participants exists.
  • Deception is not allowed in order to get subjects
    to participate in research.
  • Deception is not allowed if theres another way.
  • Use of deception requires that debriefing be
    given.

22
Debriefing
  • The true nature/goal of the study is explained to
    participants, and they are given the opportunity
    to discuss their experience.
  • The researcher takes reasonable steps to correct
    any misconceptions that participants may have.
  • When psychologists become aware that research
    procedures have harmed a participant, they take
    reasonable steps to minimize the harm.

23
The Principle of Confidentiality
  • Protecting Subjects Privacy

24
Principle of Confidentiality
  • Participants are assured of the protection of
    their privacy to prevent social harm.
  • Participants identity and responses are kept
    confidential through the use of coding and proper
    protection of videotaped material.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com