EPAs SOA Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

EPAs SOA Strategy

Description:

... (SOA) is an approach to capture, define, and expose a collection of services and ... The SRM defines a service component as 'a self-contained business process or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: sra65
Category:
Tags: soa | define | epas | strategy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EPAs SOA Strategy


1
EPAs SOA Strategy
  • Web Services Work Group January 29, 2007

2
Overview of the SOA Strategy
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is an
    approach to capture, define, and expose a
    collection of services and service components
    available throughout an organization.
  • SOA strives to achieve economies of scale in the
    development and implementation of business
    solutions via the reuse of services and service
    components.
  • Effecting the transition to SOA will not be
    simple or immediate. It will involve changes in
    both IT development and business process planning
    and management. Phasing in these changes may
    require several years.

from Strategy for Implementing Service-Oriented
Architecture (SOA) at EPA
3
Enterprise Architecture versus SOA
  • Enterprise Architecture is the appropriate tool
    for implementing SOA across an enterprise, but EA
    is not SOA
  • EA is a tool for analyzing organizations and
    managing change
  • SOA is a particular business strategy that EA can
    implement

4
Current Status of SOA at EPA
  • Because it is a recognized IT best practice, SOA
    has taken root in the EPA IT development
    community on its own
  • This strategy supports this trend in the IT
    arena, and seeks to expand SOA by degrees into
    the business community
  • Reaping the benefits of SOA in the non-IT arena
    will be an ambitious and lengthy task

5
Origins of SOA
1970s 1980s
1990s Early 2000s
TODAY
?
?
?
?
?
Reuse through function-oriented
programming(sub-routine and function reuse
Reuse through object-oriented programming(class
reuse)
Reuse through distributed object technologies and
component based architectures(CORBA/DCOM/DCE
and component reuse
Reuse through early service orientation (reuse
of web services)
Service-Oriented Architectures(SOA)
The future of software development will likely
consist of complete assembly of applications from
services and components often referred to as
true software manufacturing. Services and
Component-Based Architectures, CIO Council,
January 2006
6
Background the Service Reference Model
For EA modeling, the SRM as a bridge between the
business-driven top half and the
technology-driven bottom half of the FEA
7
Four Principles of EPAs SOA Strategy
  • Services can include both business processes and
    IT services and can exist at all levels of the
    architecture
  • All EPA services must map to the FEA SRM
  • Service components are characterized by how well
    they meet the SRMs definition of a service
    component, and by their level of complexity
  • Services, service components, and service level
    agreements (SLAs) should be defined, cataloged,
    and published

8
Principle 1 Services Exist across Levels of the
Architecture
  • The SRM defines a service component as a
    self-contained business process or service with
    predetermined functionality that may be exposed
    through a business or technology interface
  • Business service e.g. bank teller
  • IT service e.g., timesheet
  • Combined business/IT service e.g., CDX

9
Principle 2 All EPA Services must Map to the FEA
SRM
  • Consistent with FEA requirements, all services
    must map to the FEA SRM.
  • This permits the community of users to search for
    and find services that they require to conduct
    their business.

10
Mapping to services
Architecture Elements
FEA SRM, Extended
Any object in the model may be connected to any
SRM service
SRM Domains and Service Types areinherited by
the lowest service level applicablefor BCSs,
this may be at the Type level
11
Principle 3 Service Components are Defined by
SRM Definition and Level of Complexity
  • The SRM defines a service component as a
    self-contained business process or service with
    predetermined functionality that may be exposed
    through a business or technology interface
  • This second EPA SOA principle distinguishes a
    service from a component
  • It will allow EPA to track its progress in
    converting non-SOA systems to SOA systems
  • Lower-level services often aggregate into more
    complex, high-level services, with components
    calling each other at multiple levels of
    aggregation

12
Definitions of Component-ness
  • SRM Definition
  • self-contained with predetermined functionality
  • exposed through a business or technology
    interface
  • As elaborated in Service Component-Based
    Architectures V 2.0, components are
  • Encapsulated
  • Consumable
  • Extensible
  • Standards-based
  • Well-documented
  • Follow industry best-practices
  • Provide a cohesive set of services
  • Have well-defined license or service level
    agreement

13
Levels of Granularity
  • The SRM defines four levels of granularity in the
    component hierarchy
  • Distributed Component (DC) A software element
    that can be called at run-time with a clear
    interface and a clear separation between
    interface and implementation.
  • Business Component (BC) Consists of all the
    technology elements (software, hardware, and
    data) necessary to express, implement, and deploy
    a business concept as an autonomous, reusable
    element of a large information system.
  • Business Component System (BCS) A BCS is a set
    of cooperating business components assembled to
    deliver a solution to a business problem.
  • Federated Component (FC) An FC is a set of
    cooperating system-level components federated to
    resolve the business need of multiple end users
    often belonging to different organizations.

14
Mapping to Levels of Granularity
Architecture Elements
FEA SRM, Extended
Objects in the Business Layermap only to FCs and
BCSs.Objects in the Data, Application,and
Technology Layers map to BCSs, BCs, and DCs.
15
Principle 4 Services, service components, and
SLAs should be Defined, Cataloged, and Published
  • Identify, catalog, and publish all services used
    within the Agency
  • Implementation of EPAs SOA strategy will combine
    the following
  • Service level agreements (SLAs) that define the
    relationship between the provider and the
    consumer of a service, especially for high-level
    services.
  • A business service catalog used to publish and
    discover services. This catalog will contain
    business information relating to the service, but
    will drill down to a service component registry
    (described below).
  • A service component catalog (OMB calls this a
    platform), consisting of many service
    components representing business processes and
    technology service components that provide
    varying levels and types of services.
  • The service components that provide these
    services.

16
(No Transcript)
17
Metis Mapping MethodologyPutting SOA Strategy
into ART
18
Purpose of SOA Mapping Methodology
  • Create a consistent language and notation for
    discussing services, service components, and SOA
  • Integrate SOA with the FEA Service Reference
    Model
  • Apply to EPAs EA using ART and EPAs Metis
    metamodel
  • The metamodel is the toolkit of objects and
    relationships used to described the Enterprise

19
Goals of Mapping Methodologyg
  • Depict both IT and business service components,
    and the relationships and dependencies between
    them
  • Resolve ambiguities of SOA terminology to
    accommodate both the CPIC-level
    (investment/architecture) view of SOA, and the
    developers IT view (e.g., J2EE)
  • Make choices of how deep to go in developing SOA
    models
  • Find the right breakpoint between EA modeling and
    SLC-level IT development
  • Make modeling choices based on the expected use
    of the model

20
Problems to be Solved CPIC and Developer SOA
Views Differ
  • CPIC and other investment- or management-level
    views of services tend to be general and loosely
    defined
  • The developers view is analytic and logical,
    usually disaggregated and technical

Developers View of SOA Geospatial Visualization
CPIC View of SOA Geospatial Visualization
21
Problem to be Solved Services are built from
Multiple Components
EPA Portal Component View
  • Granularity becomes a problem how can we
    represent levels of granularity within a single
    object?
  • A single object needs to represent the highest
    level of the service the service to which all
    other components are aggregated

Source Lockheed Martin
22
Approach for EA Modeling Using the SRM
Component Granularity
Service Definition
Basic concept Separate component-ness from
service.
23
Approach for EA Modeling Using the SRM
Service
Potential IT Exhibit 300s
Component Granularity
Service Definition
Basic concept Separate component-ness from
service.
24
An Example CDX mapped in SOA
25
EPA Portal
26
EPA Portal
27
EPA Portal
28
EPA Portal
29
EPA Portal
30
EPA Portal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com