Title: Overview of Ecos Consultings Presentation
1Overview of Ecos Consultings Presentation
- Provide market context
- Identify the scale and type of market opportunity
presented by the state fleet - Discuss test procedure recommendations
- Report findings from rolling resistance data
collected so far - Identify remaining data needs
- Gather input from manufacturers and other
stakeholders
2Process
- Ecos Consulting was hired by CEC to conduct
outreach to manufacturers, obtain rolling
resistance data, make technical and program
design recommendations. - Ecos specializes in the process of transforming
markets for energy efficient products - 1. Research to identify the technological
market opportunities - 2. Establishing manufacturer and retailer
relationships and links to public purpose
objectives - 3. Understanding marketing leverage points for
an efficiency message. - 4. Creating a standardized test procedure and
efficiency benchmark to facilitate fair, open
competition. - 5. Implementing a program (incentives,
education, training, etc.) with trade allies to
accelerate sales of the efficient products.
3SB 1170 Overview
- Passed by Legislature in September 2001 and
signed by Governor shortly thereafter - Key provisions
- Fuel-efficiency specifications by 1/31/03
governing motor vehicles and tires - Reduce petroleum consumption to the maximum
extent practicable and cost-effective. - Goal is to reduce energy consumption of the state
vehicle fleet by at least 10 by 1/1/05 (state
buys about 1,500 vehicles and 5,000 replacement
tires per year).
4(No Transcript)
5Key Market Stats
- Total North American tire sales 24 billion
per year - 60 million OEM and 200 million replacement
tires sold per year (CA market alone 20
million units per year) - At least 28 brands and 700 models of replacement
tires for sale - Many complex partnerships among manufacturers
and brands
6Top Four Manufacturing Partnerships
(Michelin/BFGoodrich/Uniroyal, Goodyear/Dunlop,
Bridgestone/Firestone, Cooper)
Hold 56 Share of Replacement
Tire Market
Source tirebusiness.com
7Rolling Resistance Is a Factor in the Competitive
Marketplace
- Michelin/BFGoodrich/Uniroyal played a leading
role in the development of a new rolling
resistance test procedure, has won 81 of JD
Powers tire customer satisfaction awards, and
invests the greatest percentage of its revenues
in tire RD. - Goodyear has developed GT3 bioTRED models with
very low rolling resistance and corn starch-based
polymers. - Branded LRR tires for electric and hybrid
vehicles, such as Bridgestone/Firestones ECOPIA.
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10 Replacement Tire Characteristics
- Market dominated by all-season radials (90)
- About 80 of tires now carry speed ratings
- Federal government mandates ratings for
traction, treadwear, temperature resistance,
size, max pressure, max load, and other attributes
11OE / Replacement Tire Differences
- Original Equipment Tires
- Low rolling resistance sought for CAFE
- Short lifetimes (2 years) typical (new cars
driven heavily tire warranty separate from
cars) - About 42 of buyers will replace OE tires at end
of life with the same brand - Replacement Tires
- Low cost and longevity more important in
marketing than low rolling resistance - Lifetimes longer than 2 years
- About 35 of buyers will replace their second set
of tires at end of life with the same brand
12The Market Opportunity Bringing Low Rolling
Resistance to the Replacement Market
- Ongoing improvements continue from changes in
tire chemistry and design. The most efficient
tires cut RR by 30 or more, saving 2-6 of fuel
use. - Market opportunity to increase sales volumes of
OE tires in the replacement market, rather than
limiting low RR tires to the OE market only - May be able to increase brand loyalty repeat
purchases if customers can readily buy the same
replacement tires that were on their new car - Customers already pay more for better
performance, durability, and brand. With the
right marketing, customers would invest in fuel
efficiency as well.
13The Retail Side
- About 50 of all replacement tires are sold
through local dealers and another 25 through
regional and national dealers.
Bridgestone/Firestone is largest national
retailer. - General merchandise sellers like Wal-Mart, Sams
Club, Costco are only about 11-18 market share,
but are expanding. - Internet sites like tirerack.com also growing in
importance allow extensive comparative research
across brands and models before purchasing. - Minimal marketing of rolling resistance at
present.
14(No Transcript)
15From an Energy Consumption Standpoint, Tire Use
Dwarfs Manufacturing, Shipping and Recycling
Source Pirelli
16The California Fleet Market Opportunity
17U.S. Market Share Estimates for Replacement Tires
by Size
Source tirebusiness.com
18(No Transcript)
19Rolling Resistance Test Procedure Options
- SAE J1269
- Originally developed in 1979
- Only tests at one speed (80 kph)
- SAE J2452
- Developed in 1999
- Tests at 6 speeds between 115 kph and 15 kph
- Used by GM, Ford, and Daimler/Chrysler for OEM
tires - Used by NREL in ADVISOR modeling to estimate fuel
economy impacts - Other Approaches
- Coast down measurements by EPA on a test track
(SAE J2263) - Track testing of fuel consumption in pairs of
identical vehicles with different tires
20After extensive research, Ecos recommended the
use of J2452 to the CEC
- Results more predictive of real-world performance
than J1269 - Actions by the state would be consistent with
testing processes already in use between
automakers and OE tire manufacturers - Coast-down and test-track measurements can be
substantially more expensive and difficult, not
yet widely in use in industry - Linkage to NRELs ADVISOR permits straightforward
fuel economy impact assessments
21Variations Identified in the J2452 Testing
Process May Need Adjustments
- Options to True-Up Tire Test Results from
Different Manufacturers - Centralized Testing
- Trust but Verify
- Trust and Adjust
- Take the Tire Challenge
22Centralized Testing
- Main elements
- Competitively selected independent testing lab
- Manufacturers submit tires for testing
- Reports sent to CEC
- Testing costs to be paid by manufacturers who
wish to sell in California
23Trust But Verify
- Main elements
- Manufacturers provide CEC with self-tested tire
data - CEC selects random models for testing
- Independent results replace manufacturer results
if they are less favorable
24Trust and Adjust
- Main elements
- CEC assumes car mfr function of adjusting data
submitted by tiremakers - Sends tire samples to each tire mfr to test
- Analyzes submitted results
- Creates adjustment factors
- Standardize rolling resistance data before
publication
25Tire Challenge
- Main elements
- Manufacturers submit data to CEC
- Any result can be formally challenged by another
manufacturer - Sample tested at CEC-selected independent test
lab - If results come equal or better, test paid for by
challenger - If results come out worse, test paid for the
manufacturer that was challenged
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32Relational Tire Database
33How Will the Database be Used?
- Allows investigation of correlations between
rolling resistance and other tire performance
metrics (traction, tread wear, temperature
resistance, etc.) - Helps fleet buyers determine which efficient
tires are available for which vehicle types - Possible front-end for consumer education website
(vehicle/tire matching) - Assists with cost effectiveness calculations
comparing incremental cost of efficient tires to
lifetime fuel savings - Allows comparison of test lab results, possible
adjustments as needed
34Remaining Data Needs
- Only have 9 data points for J2452 and 15 data
points for J1269 Need far more tire data - OE and replacement tires needed
- Industry research on synergies and interactions
between RR and other tire attributes - Information about industry marketing of low RR
replacement tires so far - Incremental costs
- Opportunities for listing in Green Seal Choose
Green report