Adequate Yearly Progress 2005

1
Adequate Yearly Progress 2005
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
2
Requirements of NCLB
Single Statewide Accountability System
Testing
Adequate Yearly Progress
3
Requirements of NCLB

• Beginning 2005-06, test 3-8 and once in high
  school in reading and mathematics based on state
  standards
• In 2007-08, test in science once in elementary,
  middle, and high school
• Required participation in NAEP

4

• This year, grades 3-8 and grade 10 are a part of
  our statewide assessment system.

of students tested
500,000
190,000
2004-05
2005-06
5
Key Dates

• October Test booklets arrive how are you
  going to keep them secure?
• October Communicating with stakeholders how
  are you going to keep them informed?
• By October 21 Testing labels delivered to
  schools
• October 24 November 25 WKCE Testing Window
• March/April Test results and individual
  performance reports to parents
• Late May Public release of test data
• Ongoing (all year) - Ensuring success for all
  students

6
Determining AYP
Schools and districts must meet the criteria for
each of the four AYP objectives
criteria
95 of total of students enrolled in the tested
grades
Test Participation
Test Participation
Reading
Reading
67.5 proficient/advanced (FAY)
Mathematics
Mathematics
47.5 proficient/advanced (FAY)
Other Indicator
Other Indicator
90 of statewide average or growth
(Attendance/graduation)
7
Determining AYP
Wisconsin
Proficient by 2013-14 100
Proficient/Advanced
Reading
Mathematics
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2001-02
2009-10
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
8
Determining AYP
Data must be disaggregated by the following
subgroups
Minimum cell size
for
9
Determining AYP
in the subgroups where minimum cell size is
reached.
Schools are evaluated based on results of all
students in ALL the tested grades
All Tested Grades
10
Determining AYP
Districts are evaluated based on the results of
all students at each relevant GRADE SPAN
Grades 3-5
Grades 6-8
Grade 10
11
Determining AYP
in the subgroups where minimum cell size is
reached.
Districts are evaluated at each relevant GRADE
SPAN based on results from the tested grades
Grades 3-5
Grades 6-8
Grade 10
12
Determining AYP
Other Indicator

• Attendance - 90 of the statewide average
  (elementary and middle schools)
• Graduation - 90 of the statewide average (high
  schools with a graduating class)

Must miss all 3spans to miss AYP
13
Calculation Adjustments

• Two years of data in test participation, reading,
  and mathematics
• Rounding up
• FAY students test data used in reading and
  mathematics
• Non-tested students dont count in proficiency
  calculations
• Standard Error of Measure (scooping)
• Confidence Interval

14
Standard Error of Measure (Scooping)
Reading
Example
Students within one standard error of measurement
(SEM or about 10 scale score points) have been
included with the proficiency calculations for
AYP.
I missed breakfast
Im having a bad day
I could do better tomorrow
850
840
830
820
Cut score for proficiency
15
Confidence Interval
Reading
Example
The smaller the student group,the less confident
we are that the group missed the bar
75
67.5
Proficiency
50
25
40
2,000
1,000
Size of Student Group
16
The Identification
Missing AYP two consecutive years on the same
objective Test Participation Other
Indicator Reading Mathematics Schools
SIFI Districts DIFI
17
Number of Schools/Districts Missing AYP
Wisconsin AYP
Schools
Districts
18
Schools/Districts Identified for Improvement
(SIFI/DIFI)
Wisconsin AYP
Districts
Schools