Adequate Yearly Progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Adequate Yearly Progress

Description:

Timeline for Schools on Improvement. 2001-02 Baseline data (Title I history of AYP, prior identification) 2002-03 Fail to make AYP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: ksd83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Adequate Yearly Progress


1
Adequate Yearly Progress
  • Title I School Improvement
  • LCP Workshops August 2003
  • Sue King
  • LaNetra Thomas

2
Adequate Yearly Progress
  • Measures the academic progress of all
    elementary and secondary schools, districts, and
    the State

3
Assessed Content Areas
  • Reading grades 5,8, and 11
  • Mathematics grades 4,7, and 10

4
How schools/districts make the target indicators
  • Meeting or exceeding the target scores
  • Making the confidence intervals
  • Or
  • Making safe harbor

5
Goal for AYP
  • All students meet or exceed the proficient level
    on the state assessments by 2013-14
  • Narrow the achievement gap

6
Timeline for AYP
  • AYP reports have already been released for
    schools to review
  • School/district report cards (Aug.12)
  • Identification of schools/districts on
    Improvement (Aug. 12)

7
Decisions-Updates
  • Group size 30 students
  • Sept. 20 full academic year-- proficient
  • 1st day of testingparticipation
  • Confidence intervals if below the target on
    proficient
  • Confidence intervals with small schools

8
Alternate Assessments
  • 1 capbased on alternate standards
  • Not a limit on taking alternate assessment
  • Applies at district and state levels AYP
  • Could request a waiver
  • Final regulations under development

9
Modified Assessments?
  • This yearsame as off-grade level
  • No cap
  • Future? Include with alternate assessments?

10
Identified for Improvement
  • AYPmiss math 2 years or reading 2 years
  • Other indicatorsmiss any indicatorattendance
    one year, graduation the next
  • Not same disaggregated group 2 years any group
    one year ELL, one year SpEd

11
Identified for Improvement
  • 2003-04 only Title I schools and districts
  • 2005-06 non-Title I schools
  • What happens?
  • Technical assistanceKSDE, ESC, Institutions of
    Higher Education
  • Develop an action plan based on SIP
  • Resources for Title I schools available

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Did your school make AYP?
  • Did you meet or exceed the target?
  • Did you fall within the range determined by
    confidence intervals?
  • Did you make safe harbor?
  • Did you make the other indicators?
  • Participation
  • Attendance
  • Graduation

15
Activity
  • Reviewing an AYP report

16
Title I
  • Schools on Improvement

17
Title I and School Improvement
  • Annually review AYP progress
  • If a school did not make AYP for two consecutive
    years, then they are identified for school
    improvement
  • Identification occurs before the start of the
    school year
  • Within 3 months after identification, development
    and implementation of an Action Plan

18
Action Plan
  • Covers a 2-year period
  • Incorporates scientifically based research
    strategies
  • Adopts policies and practices concerning core
    academics to increase student achievement

19
Action Plan must also. . .
  • Budget 10 of Title I funds on professional
    development
  • Establish annual measurable objectives
  • Provide parents notice
  • Provide effective parent involvement

20
Action Plan (continued)
  • Incorporate
  • Teacher-mentoring programs
  • Extended learning opportunities

21
School ImprovementYear 1
  • Implement Action Plan
  • Provide school choice option
  • LEA must provide or pay for transportation
  • Receive technical assistance

22
School Choice Option
  • Eligible Students
  • Priority Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Parent Notification

23
School Choice Option
  • Eligible Schools
  • Specialty Schools
  • Limited Choices
  • Lack of Capacity
  • Out of District Transfers

24
School Choice Option
  • Availability of transfer options
  • Availability of Title I funds

25
School Choice Option
  • Transportation by LEA
  • Alternative transportation arrangements
  • Transportation zones

26
School ImprovementYear 2
  • Technical assistance continues
  • Continue transportation for school choice
  • Plus
  • Make supplemental educational services available

27
Supplemental Educational Services
  • Eligible Students
  • Priority Students
  • Students with Disabilities
  • Limited English Proficient Students
  • Parent Notification

28
Supplemental Educational Services
  • Service Providers may be
  • Non-Profit Entities
  • For-Profit Entities
  • Educational Service Agencies
  • LEAs
  • Public and Private Schools
  • Public/Private Institutions of Higher Education
  • Faith-Based Organizations
  • Providers Using Technology

29
Supplemental Educational Services
  • High quality and research based
  • Aligned with State standards
  • Providers must be financially sound

30
Supplemental Educational Services
  • Limited Choices
  • Lack of Sufficient Funds
  • Lack of Availability
  • Exemption

31
Supplemental Educational Services
  • Availability of Title I Funds
  • Availability of School Improvement Fund
  • Availability of Transportation
  • Not Required by Law

32
School ImprovementYear 3 Corrective Action
  • Continue technical assistance from the LEA, ESC,
    IHE or state
  • Continue school choice
  • Continue supplemental services
  • PLUS
  • Take at least one corrective action

33
Corrective Actions
  • Replace school staff relevant
  • Implement new curriculum
  • Decrease management authority
  • Appoint outside experts
  • Extend school day/year
  • Restructure internal organization

34
Years 4 and 5Restructuring
  • After correction action phase, the LEA
  • Continues receiving technical assistance
  • Continues school choice
  • Continues supplemental services
  • PLUS
  • Plan for restructuring

35
Restructuring
  • LEA must do one of the following
  • Reopen as a public charter school
  • Replace school staff
  • Contract with an outside entity
  • Restructure of school government

36
Timeline for Schools on Improvement
  • 2001-02 Baseline data (Title I history of AYP,
    prior identification)
  • 2002-03 Fail to make AYP
  • 2003-04 Fail to make AYP
  • 2004-05 1st year of school improvement
  • 2005-06 2nd year of school improvement
  • 2006-07 Corrective Action
  • 2007-08 Plan for restructuring
  • 2008-09 Restructuring

37
Exiting School Improvement
  • If a school identified for improvement,
    corrective action or restructuring action makes
    AYP for two consecutive years, the school is no
    longer subject to improvement or any of the
    specified sanctions.

38
Districts on Improvement
  • A district has to not make AYP for two
    consecutive years in order to be identified for
    improvement.

39
District Improvement
  • Design and implement an action plan that
  • Incorporates scientifically-based strategies
  • Identifies actions that have greatest likelihood
    of improving achievement
  • Addresses professional needs of instructional
    staff
  • Spend 10 on professional development
  • Includes measurable objectives for each subgroup

40
District Action Plan
  • Addresses teaching and learning needs of all
    students
  • Incorporates extended opportunities to learn
  • Receives technical assistance from ESC, IHE, or
    the State
  • Identifies strategies for effective parental
    involvement

41
District Corrective Action
  • SEA takes corrective action when a district fails
    to make AYP for two year after being identified
    for improvement.
  • Possible actions
  • Deferring funds, reducing administrative funds
  • Instituting a new curriculum as mandated by the
    state
  • Replacing personnel
  • Appointing a receiver to administer the affairs
    of the LEA
  • Abolishing or restructuring LEA

42
On Improvement?
  • Now What?

43
Howd We Get Here?
  • Not making AYP two years in a row
  • Missed annual targets
  • State reading assessments
  • State mathematics assessments
  • Participation rates
  • Attendance rates
  • Graduation rates

44
Who missed it?
  • All students or
  • Any disaggregated group of 30
  • Students
  • Free/reduced lunch
  • English language learners
  • Students with disabilities
  • Separate racial/ethnic groups African-American,
    Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, White,
    Multicultural

45
What Does It Mean?
  • Not a FAILING school!
  • Areas for improvement
  • Very publicmedia
  • Report cards
  • Title I schools federal sanctions
  • QPA status (new system)

46
How Do We Get Off of It?
  • Make AYP two consecutive years
  • Same content area
  • Not necessarily same disaggregated group

47
What About Non-Title I Schools?
  • New QPA system
  • Accredited on improvement
  • Conditionally accredited
  • Not accredited

48
How Do We Help?
  • Be proactive
  • Become involved
  • Needs assessments
  • Identifying strategies
  • Professional development
  • Be supportive
  • No blame
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com