Title: Kein Folientitel
1EVALUATION OF LOW PRESSURE LIQUID ATOMIZERS FOR
BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL IN ARBOREAL CROPS
Sehsah, El-Sayed G. Albert S. Kleisinger
2- Introduction
- Objectives
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussions
- Summary and Conclusions.
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Contents
3Introduction
- Plant protection in organic fruit growing means
application of abrasive or sensitive plant
protection products (PPP) with high demands
on distribution, penetration and coverage - Low pressure application in field growing is
possible with standard flat-fan nozzles at
liquid pressures below 100 kPa - In organic fruit growing there is a growing
demand for low pressure application of
living organisms and pressure sensitive or
abrasive PPP - Knowledge on low pressure agitation of poor
suspend able PPP (silicate, stone meal etc.)
is already available
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Introduction
4Introduction
- Plant protection in organic fruit growing means
application of abrasive or sensitive plant
protection products (PPP) with high demands
on distribution, penetration and coverage - Low pressure application in field growing is
possible with standard flat-fan nozzles at
liquid pressures below 100 kPa - In organic fruit growing there is a growing
demand for low pressure application of
living organisms and pressure sensitive or
abrasive PPP - Knowledge on low pressure agitation of poor
suspend able PPP (silicate, stone meal etc.)
is already available
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Introduction
5Introduction
- Plant protection in organic fruit growing means
application of abrasive or sensitive plant
protection products (PPP) with high demands
on distribution, penetration and coverage - Low pressure application in field growing is
possible with standard flat-fan nozzles at
liquid pressures below 100 kPa - In organic fruit growing there is a growing
demand for low pressure application of
living organisms and pressure sensitive or
abrasive PPP - Knowledge on low pressure agitation of poor
suspend able PPP (silicate, stone meal etc.)
is already available
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Introduction
6Introduction
- Plant protection in organic fruit growing means
application of abrasive or sensitive plant
protection products (PPP) with high demands
on distribution, penetration and coverage - Low pressure application in field growing is
possible with standard flat-fan nozzles at
liquid pressures below 100 kPa - In organic fruit growing there is a growing
demand for low pressure application of
living organisms and pressure sensitive or
abrasive PPP - Knowledge on low pressure agitation of poor
suspendable PPP (silicate, stone meal etc.)
is already available
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Introduction
7Objectives
- Low pressure application (lt 1 bar) of living
organisms in spatial crops - Study the effect of low pressure atomizers -
rotary cage atomizer - external mixing twin
fluid nozzleon the survival rate of living
organisms (Trichogramma Brassica, Encarsia
Formosa) - Compare this low pressure atomizers to the
standard flat- fan nozzle like used in field
crops
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Objectives
8Objectives
- Low pressure application (lt 1 bar) of living
organisms in spatial crops - Study the effect of low pressure atomizers -
rotary cage atomizer - external mixing twin
fluid nozzleon the survival rate of living
organisms (Trichogramma Brassica, Encarsia
Formosa) - Compare this low pressure atomizers to the
standard flat- fan nozzle like used in field
crops
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Objectives
9Objectives
- Low pressure application (lt 1 bar) of living
organisms in spatial crops - Study the effect of low pressure atomizers -
rotary cage atomizer - external mixing twin
fluid nozzleon the survival rate of living
organisms (Trichogramma Brassica, Encarsia
Formosa) - Compare this low pressure atomizers to the
standard flat- fan nozzle like used in field
crops
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Objectives
10Diagram of the laboratory test setup
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
11 Rotary cage atomizer unit (Proptec 100)
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
12External mixing Twin-fluid nozzle
TT11003VP TT11004VP TT11005VP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
13External mixing Twin-fluid nozzle
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
14Atomizer setup
- Rotary cage atomizer- rotational speed 1000,
2000, 3000, 4000 rpm- liquid pressure 50 kPa - External mixing twin-fluid nozzle - air
nozzle FT 5.0-608 (Lechler)- liquid
nozzle TT11003, TT11004, TT11005 (Spraying
Systems)- air pressure 200 kPa- liquid
pressure 50 kPa- injection angle 40
degree - Standard flat-fan nozzle- nozzle size XR8003,
XR8004, XR8005- liquid pressure 100 kPa
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
15- The living organisms were - host eggs of
Trichogramma Brassica - loose pupa of Encarsia
Formosa - The control sample was collected from the end of
the liquid line without atomizer - The organisms were filtered out of the spray
fluid, dried, stored under ambient temperature
and counted for living individuals after 14 days
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Materials and methods
16Rotary cage atomizer (Proptec) - effect of
rotational speedon T. Brassica and E. Formosa
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
17Rotary cage atomizer (Proptec) - effect of
rotational speedon T. Brassica and E. Formosa
- The viability reduction is highly correlated to
the rotational speed of the cage atomizer - E. Formosa is more sensitive to mechanical
strain than T. Brassica, because the loose
pupa of E.Formosa are bigger than the host
eggs of T. Brassica
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
18External mixing twin-fluid nozzle - effect of
liquid nozzle size, liquid pressure and air jet
on Living organisms
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
19External mixing twin-fluid nozzle - effect of
liquid nozzle size, liquid pressure and air jet
on Living organisms
- The contribution of the air jet to the
viability reduction of the living organisms
was non significant - The viability reduction was negatively
correlated to the fluid nozzle size
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
20Standard flat-fan nozzle - effect of standard
nozzle and liquid pressure on Living organisms
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
21Standard flat-fan nozzle - effect of standard
nozzle and liquid pressure on Living organisms
- The viability reduction was negatively
correlated to the fluid nozzle size - Especially E. Formosa profits from increasing
liquid nozzle size
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
22Comparison between the three tested liquid
atomizers
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
Results and discussion
23Conclusions
- In this laboratory experiment it could be shown
that a low pressure atomization (lt100 kPa) of
living organisms suspended in water is possible - The viability reduction rates which are already
below the standard field application can even be
improved at the expense of increased droplet
sizes - Particularly the results of the external mixing
twin-fluid nozzle are very promising - The tested low pressure liquid atomizers are
usable forthe application of any PPP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
24Conclusions
- In this laboratory experiment it could be shown
that a low pressure atomization (lt100 kPa) of
living organisms suspended in water is possible - The viability reduction rates which are already
below the standard field application can even be
improved at the expense of increased droplet
sizes - Particularly the results of the external mixing
twin-fluid nozzle are very promising - The tested low pressure liquid atomizers are
usable forthe application of any PPP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
25Conclusions
- In this laboratory experiment it could be shown
that a low pressure atomization (lt100 kPa) of
living organisms suspended in water is possible - The viability reduction rates which are already
below the standard field application can even be
improved at the expense of increased droplet
sizes - Particularly the results of the external mixing
twin-fluid nozzle are very promising - The tested low pressure liquid atomizers are
usable forthe application of any PPP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
26Conclusions
- In this laboratory experiment it could be shown
that a low pressure atomization (lt100 kPa) of
living organisms suspended in water is possible - The viability reduction rates which are already
below the standard field application can even be
improved at the expense of increased droplet
sizes - Particularly the results of the external mixing
twin-fluid nozzle are very promising - The tested low pressure liquid atomizers are
usable forthe application of any PPP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
27Conclusions
- In this laboratory experiment it could be shown
that a low pressure atomization (lt100 kPa) of
living organisms suspended in water is possible - The viability reduction rates which are already
below the standard field application can even be
improved at the expense of increased droplet
sizes - Particularly the results of the external mixing
twin-fluid nozzle are very promising - The tested low pressure liquid atomizers are
usable forthe application of any PPP
El-Sayed Sehsah Gerhard Albert Siegfried
Kleisinger
28EVALUATION OF LOW PRESSURE LIQUID ATOMIZERS FOR
BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL IN SPATIAL CROPS
Thank You For Your Attention
Sehsah, El-Sayed G. Albert S. Kleisinger