Definitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Definitions

Description:

Processes and Policy Implications for Travel & Sustainability ... in the context of sustainability; ... Sustainability: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: tonydo5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Definitions


1
Processes and Policy Implications for Travel
SustainabilityCivil Engineering Senior
Sophisters
  • Introduction
  • Definitions
  • Sustainability
  • Suburbanisation
  • Travel Behaviour
  • Land use/Transport Interaction
  • Settlement Morphology
  • Policy Implications

Dr. Karen Donegan Centre for Transport Research,
Department of Civil, Structural and
Environmental Engineering January
21st 2004
2
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Based on today's lecture, supporting research
methodology and case study application, students
will have a firm
  • Knowledge and Understanding
  • of -
  • basic characteristics of suburbanisation and
  • travel behaviour
  • in the context of sustainability
  • The importance of the interaction between
    transport and land use.
  • Intellectual Skills
  • Evaluate policies in the light of outcomes and
    evidence
  • Develop reasoned and sustained arguments in the
    evaluation of -
  • transport policies
  • the effectiveness of environmental assessment
  • the impacts of travel behaviour and residential
    location on the environment
  • the relationships between transport and
    sustainable development.

3
INTRODUCTION
  • The impact of travel behaviour on sustainability
    requires an explanation as to why there are
    housing developments taking place in rural towns
    (suburbanisation).
  • This obligates an awareness of
  • Sustainability
  • The Suburbanisation Process
  • Travel Behaviour
  • Land use/Transport Interaction
  • an appreciation of current policy

4
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
  • INCLUDES
  • energy conservation
  • urban design
  • waste management
  • transportation
  • urban forestry, and
  • many other disciplines
  • BUT -
  • What does sustainability really mean?

5
SUSTAINABILITY
  • is one of the most used and abused terms in
    modern environmental science
  • means different things to different people
  • has gained a high profile on governmental agendas
  • The concept requires a robust and policy relevant
    mechanism for measurement.

6
THE UK STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
  • "A Better Quality of Life" (1999) breaks down the
    definition into four key objectives, to be
    integrated and delivered simultaneously in
    achieving sustainable development
  • Social Progress which recognises the needs of
    everyone
  • Effective protection of the environment
  • Prudent use of natural resources and
  • Maintenance of high and stable levels of growth
    and employment.

7
WORKING DEFINITION
  • Sustainability
  • Meeting the needs of the present without
    compromising the ability of future
    generations to satisfy their needs
  • WCED (1987) Brundtland Report

8
DEFINITION OF SUBURBANISATION
  • Suburbanisation is the rapid expansion of
  • villages within easy reach of large towns or
    cities.
  • Such villages are termed
  • commuter villages
  • dormitory villages
  • metropolitan villages
  • incipient suburbs and
  • discontinuous suburbs.
  • Waugh (1990) highlights the key features of
  • suburbanisation in the following table.

9
CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBURBANISATION
10
HISTORICAL PROCESS OF SUBURBANISATION
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR
  • Travel behaviour is about much more than the
    political initiatives surrounding e.g.
  • road pricing
  • traffic calming
  • integrated transport
  • car-free zones
  • bus priority lanes
  • dedicated cycle paths
  • It is also about Land-use Planning Lifestyle

14
BEHAVIOURAL ASPECTS OF TRAVEL
15
LAND USE TRANSPORT INTERACTION
  • Increased affluence
  • greater mobility and
  • advances in transport technology
  • have all encouraged decentralisation of
  • residential,
  • retail outlets and
  • employment opportunities
  • Land use trends and travel patterns have
    therefore reinforced each other
  • in the emergence of a more dispersed, highly
  • mobile and car dependent society.

16
  • Transport is an important factor in the evolution
    of settlements and in turn, patterns of
    development influence the demand for movement
    (RCEP, 1995).
  • Without the advent of fast-mechanised modes of
    transport, cities would look very different from
    the way they do
  • some would have much smaller populations
  • some would not be dispersed nor built to such
    low densities
  • some would not even be where they are
    presently situated (Webster and Paulley, 1990).

17
  • In confronting the sustainability issues of
    lifestyle and land-use
  • there is a need to be able to quantify the
  • sustainability of household travel
  • behaviour

18
SETTLEMENT MORPHOLOGY TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR
  • Factors that influence travel behaviour arise
    from the emergence of a highly mobile and
    dispersed society.
  • Patterns of land use also influence travel
    behaviour.
  • Settlement morphology is related to the
    frequency, distance, speed and mode of travel.
  • There is broad consensus that land use planning
    policies should seek to minimise the need for
    travel and encourage the use of less polluting
    forms of transport.

19
LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT
  • is an important factor in reducing the necessity
    for travel.
  • location of development close to an existing
    urban area or strategic transport corridors
    conclusively distorts travel patterns (Headicar,
    1997)
  • Settlements located within the urban fringe
    occupy lower levels of self-containment
    themselves but in terms of travel effects, this
    is more than offset by the links with the
    principal city.
  • In the ever-expanding stand-alone settlements,
    more than a quarter of all work journeys are to
    places outside that settlement.
  • the location of developments close to strategic
    transport routes has a distorting effect by
    increasing the proportion of very long commuting
    journeys. It also biases the mode share towards
    the route concerned.

20
RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES
  • A city's form and land use determine its
    efficiency in the use of energy, materials, water
    and space.
  • Dense settlement patterns together with mixed
    land uses that are generally associated with
    European cities are considered more efficient in
    the use of natural resources.
  • The density and location of urban activities as
    well as the provision of infrastructure also
    affect travel patterns and petrol consumption and
    hence the level of emissions from transport.

21
RESEARCH SHOWS.
  • Different settlement and land use patterns have
    been analysed in relation to the pressure on the
    local and global environment, generated by
    selected cities worldwide
  • International comparisons of gasoline usage per
    head in different cities suggest that consumption
    rises at an increasing rate as densities fall.
  • US cities with the lowest densities exhibit the
    highest mobile energy consumption rates
  • Newman Kenworthy (1989a/b) and Newman (1992)
  • European cities are relatively fuel efficient,
    and those cities with very high densities are the
    most efficient.

22
UK GOVMENT RESEARCH CONFIRMED THAT
  • land use policies could reduce projected
    transport emissions by 16 over twenty years.
  • differences in total distances travelled per week
    are largely linked to varying levels of car use
    and population density.
  • overall per capita travel distance increases for
    smaller urban areas, most of the increase being
    by car.

ECOTEC, (1993)
23
FURTHER RESEARCH SHOWS.
  • Metropolitan areas (excluding London) appear to
    induce the least travel,
  • Smaller urban and rural areas are more fuel
    inefficient and hence unsustainable
  • It has been suggested that this is because modal
    split moves towards the greater use of rail and
    bus when densities are increased, thus
  • car use declines and so does energy consumption
    per capita.
  • Wood et al. (1994) - As cited in the Bartlett
    School of Planning - URBASSS Executive Summary
    (2002) 

24
INTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE
  • If distance travelled, fuel consumption and
    emissions are to be reduced
  • need for policies to promote densification, urban
    compaction and public transport, (Cooper et al,
    2002)
  • Stricter urban containment will reduce the need
    for travel (which is the fastest growing and
    least controlled contributor to global warming) -
    by facilitating shorter journeys and inducing
    greater supply and use of public transport,
    Breheny (1996) .
  • reduce the use of non-renewable fuels along with
    harmful emissions.

25
  • More compact cities, when appropriately planned,
    reduce travel needs and provide many
    opportunities for efficient public transport and
    other forms of energy saving.
  • By ensuring the appropriate mixtures of land
    uses, the availability of local facilities and
    employment, and good quality public transport,
    the efficiency in levels of transport would be
    significantly increased if the dependence on car
    travel was reduced and balanced communities were
    encouraged (Banister, 1992).

26
  • In a study carried out by Winter et al. 1995, the
    following hypothesis 'local provision of
    facilities/services leads to local use' was
    upheld
  • most local facilities were utilised with a
    twofold advantage,
  • firstly, shorter trip lengths and
  • secondly, more trips were made by foot.
  • It was concluded that the following eight
    facilities food shop, newsagent, open space,
    post office, primary schools, public house,
    supermarket and secondary schools - should be
    provided in all large housing developments.

HOWEVER ...
27
  • Provision of local facilities does not itself
    encourage more walking to those facilities.
  • Although provision of local services/facilities
    is a necessary condition for local use, it does
    not necessarily follow that provision leads to
    use.
  • More important determinants of mode choice rest
    with personal and household characteristics.
  • In practice,
  • people must make a conscious choice to use the
    facilities rather than get into the car and
    travel to more distant competing facilities
    (Farthing et al., 1996).
  • This is dependent on peoples perceived needs and
    predisposition towards car use - which cannot be
    determined by land use policies.

28
THE COMPACT CITY
  • A way to reduce travel needs would be to bring
    homes, jobs, and services together in a
    relatively compact urban centre to achieve a high
    level of accessibility with little need for
    movement.
  • The compact city is being promoted throughout
    Europe and the UK as a means of promoting
    sustainability.
  • Planners should aim for compactness and
    integration of land uses in order to attain some
    degree of "self-containment".

29
THE COMPACT CITY - BENEFITS
  • less car dependency
  • low emissions
  • reduced energy consumption
  • better public transportation services
  • increased overall accessibility
  • the re-use of infrastructure and previously
    developed land
  • the rejuvenation of existing urban areas and
    urban vitality
  • a high quality of life
  • the preservation of green space, and
  • a milieu for enhanced business and trading
    activities.

30
A LOCAL DIMENSION
  • Focuses on implications of suburbanisation for
    travel behaviour and sustainability
  • urban overspill on dormitory settlements
  • Seeks to test the hypothesis that
  • Current trends in suburbanisation are
  • militating against the aims of sustainable
    development..

31
  • This research project corresponds with two
    questions raised by the DoEs 1997 Shaping Our
    Future
  • What choice of development opportunities is
    consistent with a long term sustainable approach
    to regional development?
  • Is it possible to set new directions in relation
    to the future pattern of development, in order to
    produce a better outcome for the region?

32
RESEARCH DIRECTION
  • The research involves
  • people
  • their residential location
  • their travel behaviour
  • their choices
  • their attitudes
  • within a virtual information framework
  • structured from expert opinion
  • based on sustainability indicators as attributes

33
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
  • To formulate a methodology
  • capable of wider application
  • supporting planning policy considerations
  • To establish a consensus checklist of
  • travel behaviour indicators
  • reflecting sustainability
  • basis for comparing community settlements
  • basis for comparing households

34
ASSESSMENT INVOLVES
  • A multiattribute model
  • The integration of expert opinion with observed
    data
  • EXPERTS Sustainability/Transport
  • SURVEY Number of settlement classes

35
SURVEY LOCATION
  • The southern commuter corridor of BCR
  • with four settlement classifications
  • 1 Inner city - brownfield/infill sites
  • - Dublin Road - Ormeau Road,
    - Ravenhill Road
  • 2 Edge of city - Fourwinds
  • 3 Dormitory area - Knockmore, Lisburn
  • 4 Suburbanised Village - Moira

36
ASSESSMENT TOOL
  • A linear aggregation of the expert weightings
    and household scores to provide a discriminating
    index of travel behaviour sustainability for
    each sampled household (The Household
    Sustainability Index) through
  • an analytic hierarchy of travel behaviour
    indicators to assess expert weightings
  • a corresponding points scheme designed to assess
    individual households

37
TOWARDS AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK The Household
Sustainability Index (HSI)
  • The modelling strategy is set in five distinct
    phases
  • Phase 1 inclusive or conceptualisation
  • Phase 2 expert opinion
  • Phase 3 household survey
  • Phase 4 data integration
  • Phase 5 statistical analysis.
  • These phases although discrete in their purpose,
    are integrated and interactive in their function.

38
METHODOLOGY
39
THE MULTI-ATTRIBUTE MODEL
40
ATTRIBUTES
  • TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR INDICATORS
  • (Determined by expert consensus)
  • ANALYTIC HIERARCHY
  • POINTS SCHEME

41
HIERARCHICAL MODEL
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
POLICY
ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENTAL
OBJECTIVES
SOCIAL
AMENITY PROVISION
LANDUSE PLANNING
ENTERPRIZE INITIATIVES
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
TACTICS
MODE
LOCATION
FREQUENCY
PROXIMITY
VEHICLES
ATTRIBUTES
42
PURPOSE OF HIERARCHICAL MODEL
  • To reduce remoteness in decision making so that
    attributes can be rated directly with respect to
    policy
  • by attaching expert weights to each of the
    objectives, tactics and attributes
  • attributes
  • are prioritised with respect to each tactic
  • tactics
  • are prioritised with respect to each objective
  • objectives
  • are prioritised with respect to policy

43
  • Ultimately, the decision weight vectors at each
    level are grouped in matrix form so that, if they
    are identified as
  • C/T the COMPONENTS to TACTICS matrix,
  • T/O the TACTICS to OBJECTIVES matrix and
  • O/P the OBJECTIVES to POLICY matrix ,
  • then
  • the matrix product C/T ? T/O ? O/P yields a
    COMPONENTS to POLICY vector which when normalised
    gives the desired prioritisation weights.

44
FINAL ATTRIBUTES WEIGHTINGS (From personal data
related to the Belfast survey)
45
SUB-ATTRIBUTES USED IN DETERMINATION OF POINTS
46
TYPICAL HSI CALCULATION FOR A HOUSEHOLD
47
CONTRIBUTION OF MEAN HSIs TO THE MEAN LOCATION
HSI
48
RESULTS - Typical SPSS Output
Belfast Knockmore display a greater difference
between the mean HSI values, (respective
significance values p0.003 and p0.022).
49
CAR OWNERSHIP RESULTS
50
WORK ACTIVITY MODAL SPLIT BY LOCATION
51
(No Transcript)
52
NEWCOMER RESIDENTS OF BELFAST
AVERAGE MODAL SPLIT PERCENTAGES ACROSS ALL
ACTIVITIES
53
CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE
  • promote brownfield sites within established urban
    areas
  • take account of the distribution of activity
    centres/attractors in design if new housing
  • offer planners a new insight into the
    practicalities of promoting sustainable area
    planning
  • reveal the householders attitudes to sustainable
    lifestyles as well as providing base-line data on
    current behaviour patterns

54
  • illustrate the use of travel behaviour indicators
    linked to a structured and stable points scheme
  • address the notion of comparative sustainability
    across settlement types based on travel
    behavioural issues
  • offer potential for an area-wide comparative
    basis for ranking settlements, particularly
    commuter settlements, against normalised
    sustainability benchmarks

55
PROGRESS..
  • Over the last few years national transport policy
    in the UK has been focused on the goal of getting
    people out of their cars and onto public
    transport.
  • Issues of increased density and compaction, urban
    form and structure have also moved centre stage
    within sustainable development policy

56
  • With the sustainability debate high on Government
    agenda, and with emphasis on Agenda 21, Northern
    Ireland is striving to follow its European and UK
    wide counterparts.
  • Already, plans for
  • traffic-calming measures,
  • cycleways, priority bus lanes and
  • urban regeneration
  • have been implemented.
  • Recent media attention has been directed at
    purpose-built villages, which are at various
    stages of design and development.

57
CONCLUDING REMARKS
  • A target of 4.4 million new homes in the UK
    raises the issue of
  • GREENFIELD -Vs- BROWNFIELD
  • development and a coupled anxiety about the
    inevitable urban sprawl, so If we are to set
    about achieving our working definition, action
    must be taken

58
ACTION REQUIRED
  • Need to make high density areas more attractive
    to consumers.
  • Housing capacity could be significantly increased
    by
  • careful control of design
  • pragmatic use of on-street spaces to meet parking
    demand
  • retention of street trees, planting and open
    spaces
  • These could replace emphasis on maximum density
    (Llewelyn-Davies, 1994).

59
Recommended Reading.
  • Webster, F.V. and Paulley, N.J., An Interaction
    Study on Land Use and Transport Interaction,
    Transport Reviews, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 287-308,
    (1990).
  • The Bartlett School of Planning Web Site
    http//www.transplus.net/
  • David Banister, Ian Cullen, Roger Mackett, The
    impact of land use on travel demand. London
    Planning and Development Research Centre, UCL,
    (1990).
  • David Banister and Kenneth Button (Eds.),
    Transport, the environment and sustainable
    development. London Spon, (1993).
  • Land use, transport and environmental
    sustainability in cities. Michele Cera -
    http//www.uta.fi/laitokset/historia/ester/papers/
    Paper_Cera.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com