The God Delusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

The God Delusion

Description:

Professor for the public understanding of science ... Permanent Agnosticism in Principle ('PAP') Temporary Agnosticism in Practice ('TAP' ... PAP... example ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:437
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Vaug50
Category:
Tags: delusion | god

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The God Delusion


1
The God Delusion
  • Richard Dawkins
  • An impassioned rebuttal of religion of all types
  • (published 2006)

2
Richard Dawkins
  • Professor for the public understanding of science
    at Oxford university
  • Fellow of New College
  • Fellow of the Royal Society
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature
  • 2005 Shakespeare Prize
  • 2001 Kistler Prize
  • 1997 international Cosmos Prize for achievement
    in human science
  • 1990 Michael Faraday award of the Royal Society
  • 1987 Royal Society of Literature Award

3
Richard Dawkins
  • He is best known as an ethologist, evolutionary
    biologist and science writer
  • He is also an atheist, a secular humanist, a
    sceptic, and an outspoken critic of creationism
  • His early books include
  • The Selfish Gene (1976), The Extended Phenotype
    (1982), The Blind Watchmaker (1986), River out of
    Eden (1995), Climbing Mount Improbable (1996),
    Unweaving the Rainbow (1998), and The Ancestors
    Tale (2004).
  • His latest publication and the most controversial
    is The God Delusion
  • The English language version has sold over 1.5
    million copies and been translated into 31
    different languages
  • It has become his most popular book

4
The God Delusion Ten Chapters
  • 1. A deeply religious non-believer
  • 2. The God Hypothesis
  • 3. Arguments for Gods existence
  • 4. Why there almost certainly is no God
  • 5. The roots of religion
  • 6. The roots of morality why are we good?
  • 7. The Good Book and the changing moral
    Zeitgeist
  • 8. Whats wrong with religion? Why be so
    hostile?
  • 9. Childhood, Abuse and the escape from religion
  • 10. A much needed gap?

5
H. Allen Orr New York Review of Books
  • The God Delusion seems to me badly flawed.
    Though I once labelled Dawkins as a professional
    atheist, Im forced, after reading his new book,
    to conclude hes actually more an amateur.

6
Some quotable quotes
  • All religions are the same religion is basically
    guilt with different holidays (Anon)
  • Truth, in matters of religion, is simply the
    opinion that has survived (Oscar Wilde)
  • When enough people share a delusion, it loses its
    status as a psychosis and gets a religious tax
    exemption instead (Richard de Sousa)

7
Three themes to be covered
  • Is God amenable to scientific inquiry? (Don)
  • Chapters 1,2 and 4
  • The origins of religion (Lindsay)
  • Chapter 5
  • Does ethics depend on religion? (Don)
  • Chapters 6 and 7

8
Einsteinian religion
  • Dawkins claims
  • By religion, Einstein meant something entirely
    different from what is conventionally meant.
    (p.15)

9
Some Einsteinian quotes
  • I do not believe in a personal God and I have
    never denied this but have expressed it clearly.
    If something is in me which can be called
    religious, then it is the unbounded admiration
    for the structure of the world so far as our
    science can reveal it

10
Some more.
  • The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me
    and seems even naive.
  • I am a deeply religious non-believer. This is a
    somewhat new kind of religion.
  • I believe in Spinozas God who reveals himself in
    the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God
    who concerns himself with fates and actions of
    human beings.

11
.and finally
  • I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a
    goal, or anything that could be understood as
    anthropomorphic. What I see in nature is a
    magnificent structure that we can comprehend only
    very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking
    person with a feeling of humility. This is a
    genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to
    do with mysticism.

12
Dawkins sums up
  • Einstein was using God in a purely
    metaphorical, poetic sense. So is Stephen
    Hawking (for then we should know the mind of
    God), and so are most of those physicists who
    occasionally slip into the language of religious
    metaphor.

13
Dawkins plea ( a sample of his angry mood)
  • I wish that physicists would refrain from using
    the word God in their special metaphorical sense.
    The metaphorical or pantheistic God of the
    physicists is light years away from the
    interventionist, miracle-wreaking,
    thought-reading, sin-punishing, prayer-answering
    God of the Bible, of priests, mullahs and rabbis,
    and of ordinary language. Deliberately to
    confuse the two is, in my opinion, an act of
    intellectual high treason.

14
The God Hypothesis
  • There exists a super-human, supernatural
    intelligence who deliberately designed and
    created the universe and everything in it,
    including us.

15
Agnosticism two types
  • Permanent Agnosticism in Principle (PAP)
  • Temporary Agnosticism in Practice (TAP)

16
PAP example
  • In 1835, the celebrated French philosopher
    Auguste Comte wrote, of the stars We shall
    never be able to study, by any method, their
    chemical composition or their mineralogical
    structure. Yet even before Comte had set down
    these words, Fraunhofer had begun using his
    spectroscope to analyse the chemical composition
    of the sun. Now spectroscopists daily confound
    Comtes agnosticism with their long distance
    analysis of the precise composition of even
    distant stars.

17
TAP examples
  • What caused the massive extinction of life at the
    end of the Permian period?
  • We dont know, but one day we might find out at
    least a possible answer, just as we have with the
    Cretaceous extinction.
  • Does life occur elsewhere in the universe?
  • Again we dont know, but now we do know there are
    several hundred planets circling other stars.
    This was not known a few years ago.
  • Dawkins comments. We must still be agnostic
    about life on other worlds but a little bit
    less agnostic. Science can chip away at
    agnosticism ..

18
Gods existence
  • Gods existence or non-existence is a scientific
    fact about the universe, discoverable in
    principle if not in practice. (p.50)

19
NOMA Non-Overlapping Magisteria
  • Stephen Jay Gould
  • The net, or magisterium , of science covers the
    empirical realm what is the universe made of
    (fact) and why does it work this way (theory).
    The magisterium of religion extends over
    questions of ultimate meaning and moral value.
    These two magisteria do not overlap, nor do they
    encompass all inquiry (consider, for example, the
    magisterium of art and the meaning of beauty).

20
Dawkins Bottom Line
  • A universe in which we are alone except for
    other slowly evolved intelligences is a very
    different universe from one with an original
    guiding agent whose intelligent design is
    responsible for its very existence.
  • The presence or absence of a creative
    super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific
    question, even if it is not in practice or not
    yet a decided one.

21
Rephrasing
  • If God interacts in any way with the natural
    world (or the universe), even if it is only at
    its creation, the world will be affected in some
    way there will be a change, some sort of
    result, and therefore, in principle, Gods action
    is amenable to scientific inquiry.

22
Dawkins Alternative to The God Hypothesis
  • Any creative intelligence, of sufficient
    complexity to design anything, comes into
    existence only as the end product of an extended
    process of gradual evolution
  • Or, in other words
  • Creative intelligences, being evolved,
    necessarily arrive late in the universe, and
    therefore cannot be responsible for designing it.

23
Discuss
  • Can Dawkins sideline the Einsteinian God?
  • Is his formulation of The God Hypothesis valid?
  • Do you think God is amenable to scientific
    inquiry?
  • How about Dawkins extension of Darwinism to
    eliminate God?

24
Chapter 5 The origins of religion
  • Where does religion come from?
  • Why do virtually all cultures have it?
  • To answer these questions, Dawkins argues that
    religion is a by-product of something else
  • Benefits of religion may include
  • gt Providing consolation and comfort
  • gt Fostering togetherness
  • gt Satisfying our yearning for knowledge of
    existence

25
A Darwinian approach
  • The Darwinian question is
  • What is the advantage generated by having a
    religion? Religion is wasteful of scarce
    resources
  • Large quantities of time and energy used in the
    construction of temples and cathedrals
  • Death of many who have died in religious wars
  • Darwinian selection ruthlessly eliminates waste

26
A Darwinian approach
  • How has religion benefited the survival of an
    individuals genes?
  • My suggestions
  • Large families with the womans primary role
    being child bearing (traditional Roman
    Catholicism, Exclusive Brethren)
  • Polygamy (traditional Mormons, Islam)

27
Religion as a by-product
  • Consider religion as a by-product
  • Example - moths flying into lighted candles
    because their eyes use light from distant objects
    (moon) for navigation, not because they want to
    commit suicide
  • Apply this to religious groups that utilise
    beliefs that are contradicted by science

28
Some widely-held religious beliefs
  • Examples are
  • The virgin birth
  • The raising of Lazarus
  • The resurrection of Jesus
  • God hearing everybodys thoughts
  • The day of judgement
  • Bread wine becoming the body of Christ

29
Are humans psychologically primed for religion?
  • Human tendency to dualism
  • Deep-seated human belief that the mind and the
    body inhabit different worlds
  • Mental illness being seen as possession by demons
  • Striking similarities between the intense love
    that a worshipper feels for God and the love an
    admirer feels for his/her dearly beloved

30
A Darwinian view of religion
  • Religious groups use a lot of resources in
    pursuit of their religious activities
  • Children initially trust those in authority who
    provide them with advice on how to live in this
    world
  • Many attributes of religion are designed to help
    its survival
  • This has probably occurred by a mixture of design
    and natural selection.

31
Belief and reason
  • Martin Luther repeatedly warned Christians of the
    danger of reason
  • Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has it
    never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but
    struggles against the Divine Word, treating with
    contempt all that emanates from God.
  • Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear out
    the eyes of his reason.
  • Reason should be destroyed in all Christians.

32
A Darwinian approach to ideas
  • Natural selection as it applies to ideas (memes)
    rather than to genetic material
  • Gene pools for carnivores would contain a
    different groupings of genes compared with those
    for herbivores
  • great sense of smell, sharp claws, meat-eating
    teeth, meat-digesting enzymes

33
A Darwinian approach to ideas
  • A meme pool of religious ideas
  • You will survive your own death
  • If you die a martyr, you will go to paradise
    and there will be 72 virgins waiting for you
  • Heretics, blasphemers and apostates will be
    punished (by death, mutilation or ostracism)
  • Belief in God is a supreme virtue. If you find
    your belief wavering, work hard at restoring it
    and beg God to help your unbelief.

34
A Darwinian approach to ideas
  • Faith (belief without evidence) is a virtue. The
    more your beliefs defy the evidence, the more
    virtuous you are.
  • Religious beliefs must be accorded a higher level
    of respect than other beliefs.
  • Do not try to understand mysterious things such
    as the trinity, transubstantiation or
    reincarnation. Become fulfilled by calling it a
    mystery.
  • Beautiful music, art and scriptures are
    self-replicating tokens of religious ideas.

35
A Darwinian view
  • Some of these memes have absolute survival value
    and would flourish in any meme pool.
  • Others would only survive with the right mix of
    memes.
  • Consider Islam and Buddhism as two meme pools,
    with Islam analogous to a carnivorous gene
    complex and Buddhism analogous to a herbivorous
    one.

36
An example of a meme - Cargo cults
  • Evolution of ideas
  • Cargo cults evolved at an astonishing speed
  • They arose in both New Guinea and Pacific
    Melanesia the earliest ones from the 19th
    Century, the more recent ones from after WW2.
  • The wondrous possessions that the immigrants
    brought.
  • Broken ones were sent away and new ones kept
    arriving.

37
Cargo cults
  • No white man was ever seen to do anything that
    could be recognised as being useful.
  • Sitting behind a desk shuffling paper was
    obviously a form of religious devotion
  • Cargo was obviously of supernatural origin.
  • The locals eventually figure out that these
    rituals are important to encourage the gods to
    send more cargo.
  • More than 17 outbreaks in New Caledonia, the
    Solomons, Fiji and the Hebrides
  • Over 50 in New Guinea.

38
Discuss
  • What do you believe are the likely origins of
    religion?
  • What have been the common roles for religion?
  • Are these roles changing?

39
Does Ethics depend on Religion?
  • Chapter 6
  • The roots of morality why are we good?
  • Chapter 7
  • The Good Book and the changing moral Zeitgeist

40
Chapters 6 and 7, Contents
  • Two Chapters 64 pages on Ethics?
  • In fact, Chapters 6 and 7 are composed of
  • 30 pages on the horrors of sacred scriptures or
    the behaviour of religious people,
  • 12 pages on the evolution of altruism,
  • 10 pages on the Moral Zeitgeist,
  • 7 pages on Hitler and Stalin, and
  • 5 pages on ethics

41
On the Origin of the Moral Sense
  • A Darwinian perspective
  • Altruism kinship, reciprocation and
    symbiosis, reputation, conspicuous generosity
  • Misfiring or the by-product theory
  • Moral dilemmas across cultural and religious
    boundaries thought experiments

42
Moral Philosophers two types
  • Absolutists Absolutists believe there are
    absolutes of right and wrong, imperatives whose
    rightness makes no reference to the consequences.
  • Consequentialists Consequentialists hold that
    the morality of an action should be judged by its
    consequences.

43
The Moral Zeitgeist
  • Zeitgeist spirit of the times
  • A broad liberal consensus of ethical principles
    A mysterious consensus which changes over the
    decades and moves in parallel, on a broad
    front, throughout the educated world.

44
Conclusion on the Zeitgeist
  • Where, then, have these concerted and steady
    changes in social consciousness come from?... For
    my purposes, it is sufficient that they certainly
    have not come from religion.

45
Discuss
  • Are there any absolutes?
  • Has religion played a part in the development of
    the moral Zeitgeist?
  • Will it continue to play a part in the future?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com