Title: Introduction to corpus session
1Introduction to corpus session
- General corpora
- Rosamund Moon lexicography, polysemy data
- Alice Deignan
- Specialised corpora
- Elena Semino
- Andreas Musolff
2Corpus linguistics
- Seeks to account for all citations (or a large,
random sample) of a word, including all its
inflections - Pays close attention to linguistic form
- (among other principles)
3Some characteristics of corpus research into
metaphor
- Forces difficult decisions
- Static vs dynamic views of language
- Metaphors as part of resources of language
4Problems of categorizing metaphors in corpus data
5Structure
- Methodology for studying metaphors in corpora
Research Questions - Distinctions used in classifying corpus data
- Problems
6Methodology
- Studying whole concordance, or large random
sample, of all inflections of a lexeme - Identifying literal and metaphorical senses
- Tracing semantic relationships between senses
- Examining linguistic, semantic and pragmatic
features of both
7Research questions
- Implications for metaphor theory of
- grammatical behaviour of literal and non-literal
uses - collocational patterns
- semantic relations between literal and
non-literal uses - evaluative meaning of literal and non-literal
uses.
8Assumptions underlying this methodology
- Linguistic details are important in themselves,
and as realisations of cognitive processes - Literal and non-literal meanings can be separated
- Metaphor is the dominant trope
- The word is a valid unit of analysis
9Distinctions used in analysing metaphors using
corpus data
- From applied linguistics word/ collocation/
idiom - From semantics semantics/ pragmatics
denotation/ connotation - From metaphor theory metaphor/ metonymy/ literal
use
10Coherence of metaphorical mapping
- creating a more favourable and positive
environment in which business can flourish. - Though Ashokas empire fragmented politically
after his death, the great flowering of Indian
culture begun in his reign continued - Lincolns view that slavery would wither and
die. - Wild generosity often shrivels up in the cold
wind of reality. - The market wilted in line with softer overseas
bonds.
11A less clearcut case
- Fire/ fires/ fired/ firing
- 12088 citations in 59 million word general
corpus. Around 16 non-literal.
12Some non-literal uses of fire
- Add fuel to the fire
- Get on like a house on fire
- (be) fired up
- Fire from the hip
- Come under fire
- Get caught in cross-fire
- Fuel the fire
13The Achilles heel of quality the assessment of
student learning
- Achilles heel 41 citations in corpus, 2 of which
literal - 885 where heel clearly refers to part of a foot,
hand, shoe or something shaped like a heel - 3 which may be metaphorical, where heel refers to
an unpleasant person
14The remaining 473 citations of heel
- Hard on the heels of
- Well heeled
- Head over heels
- Hot on the heels of
- Achilles heel
- Turn on your heel
- Dig in your heels
15More fixed expressions
- Bring someone to heel
- Kick ones heels
- Snap at someones heels
- Down at heel
- Drag ones heels
- Cool ones heels
- Kick up ones heels
- Be under the heel of someone
16Cline between literal and figurative meaning
- Literal
- her fat insteps leaning over her down at heel
shoes - ???
- Watch out for down at heel strangers who want to
share a room - Figurative (metaphor from metonymy)
- a tale of love, laziness, lies and lobelia
amongst the staff of a down at heel gardening
magazine
17Analysing fixed expressions in terms of CMs
- Heels LIFE IS A JOURNEY? DOWN IS BAD?
- The CM is very partial
- The CM has no predictive power in terms of
linguistic realisation - No account for the linguistic fixedness
18Patterns..
- The metaphor/ metonymy split may not fit natural
language data borderline uses predominate - Figurative language is very frequently found in
semi-fixed lexico-grammatical strings - It is difficult in most cases to assign a
specific sense- literal or figurative- to many
lexico-grammatical strings
19In other words..
- A number of distinctions which we often try to
make seem to break down - Word/ idiom
- Metaphor/ metonymy
- Literal/ non-literal
- Semantic/ pragmatic meaning
- But these expressions seem to be so common that
they need to be placed at the centre of enquiry
rather than seen as atypical, borderline cases.
20Relevant work
- Moon 1998 discoursal and evaluative properties
of fixed expressions and idioms difficulty of
distinguishing literal from non-literal uses - Gibbs 1994, 1999 centrality of metonymy
- Goossens 1995 interactions between metaphor and
metonymy - Musolff 2004 metaphor scenarios
21Kovecses, 2005. Metaphor in Culture Universality
and Variation. Cambridge University Press. P. 32
- apparently irregular uses may eventually turn out
to be systematic when found in large numbers in
large corpora
22Further research
- How frequent are such fixed figurative
expressions, as percentages of concordances of a
word? - Do non-literal meanings tend to be carried in
fixed expressions rather than in single words? - Does metonymy generate multi-word expressions
while metaphor generates single words? - Are conventional linguistic metonyms more
frequent than conventional linguistic metaphors?
23Implications?
- If the answer to the first question is fixed
figurative expressions are very frequent, and
the answers to the rest are yes, what are the
implications for a theory of metaphor?