CNS poster 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

CNS poster 2003

Description:

M170 is sensitive to visual form processing in the brain (e.g. letter, symbol, ... to either the M100 (visual cortex) or M170 (letter string/visual word form area) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: mega5
Category:
Tags: cns | form | poster

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CNS poster 2003


1
Visual Word Form Recognition An MEG study using
Masked Priming
  • Heejeong Ko1, Michael Wagner1, Linnaea Stockall1,
    Sid Kouider2, Alec Marantz1
  • 1Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
    KIT-MIT MEG Laboratory, 2Ehess/CNRS, Paris

1
4
6
Testing Identity Priming with MEG
Testing Morphological Priming with MEG
  • Goals of the Study
  • To establish the neuropsychological correlates of
    identity priming in visual word processing in the
    masked priming paradigm without conscious
    perception, using Magnetoencephalography (MEG).
  • To identify the MEG components that dissociate
    the priming effects of morphological and
    orthographical relatedness in the masked priming
    paradigm.
  • Stimuli. (240 Items 120 word targets, 120
    nonword targets) mostly taken from Rastle et al.
    (2000, 2003). (1) 40 tokens of control and
    identity condition (abyss - BOWEL (control)
    bowel BOWEL (identity)). 40 tokens of
    semantically related fillers (gut - BOWEL). (2)
    40 tokens of nonword target triplets (hora -
    ABOL, abol - ABOL, tomato - ABOL).
  • Hypothesis. If morphological decomposition
    applies blindly to all potentially complex words
    in early visual processing (e.g broth-er), we
    expect to find identity priming effects when two
    words are potentially morphologically related in
    early visual processing (brother-BROTH).
  • Procedure. DMDX presentation with masked priming
    (resolution 1024768 , 60Hz). Prime duration 34
    ms. ISI500ms. Items were divided in three blocks
    and counterbalanced in each block. Items were
    scrambled randomly by DMDX. Lexical Decision Task.
  • Stimuli. (240 items120 word targets, 120 nonword
    targets) stimuli are mostly taken from Rastle et
    al. (2000, 2003). (1) 40 tokens of control,
    morphology, and orthography condition
    (trifle-BROTH (control), brother-BROTH
    (morphology), brothel-BROTH (orthography)). (2)
    40 tokens of nonword target triplets (supply-ANG,
    anger-ANG, angle-ANG).

2
GIFT Target
Fixation 500ms
gift Prime 34ms
Forward Mask 500 ms
Early Visual Word Responses in the Brain
  • Procedure, Subject, and MEG data analysis are the
    same as in our experiment 1 (see 4 in the
    poster).

M100 Early Visual Response
M170 Visual Word Activation
  • Subjects. 14 right-handed native English speakers
    with normal vision gave informed consent to
    participate in the experiment. MEG data from 11
    subjects.
  • M170 is sensitive to visual form processing in
    the brain (e.g. letter, symbol, face) (Tarkiainen
    et al. 1999). In our laboratory, M170 has not
    been sensitive to lexicality or frequency of
    words.
  • M100 is the first large MEG time component evoked
    by visual stimuli. Generated by primary visual
    cortex bi-laterally. More activity for
    noisier/longer letter and symbol strings
    (Tarkiainen et al. 1999).

7
Results Morphological Priming in the Brain
  • MEG Data collection. Neuromagnetic fields were
    recorded using a 93-channel axial gradiometer
    whole-head system for 6 subjects and a
    157-channel system for 5 subjects (KIT, Kanazawa,
    Japan). Data were acquired in a band between DC
    and 200Hz, at a 1000Hz sampling frequency.
  • Behavioral Results. N11. RT in the morphology
    condition is significantly faster than RT in the
    control condition (p0.019). No significant
    difference between the orthography and control
    condition in RT (p.310). The RT difference
    between the morphology and orthography condition
    is approaching significance (p 0.065),
    replicating Rastle et al. (2003).

p0.019
  • MEG Data analysis. 25 sensors from 157 MEG
    channels, and 13 sensors from 93 MEG channels in
    the left hemisphere were selected as the Sensors
    of Interest (SOI). SOI had the negative field for
    M100 and the positive field for M170 (see 2 in
    the poster).15 data points from the time window
    for M100 (80ms-150ms) and 15 data points from the
    time window for M170 (155ms-225 ms) were included
    from each SOI for statistical analysis. Outlier
    data that do not match the typical polarity of
    the relevant components were filtered out.
    One-way ANOVA (DV amplitude at each time point,
    IV subject, time, condition) and planned
    comparisons for timecondition interactions were
    conducted through SPSS.

plt.0001
5
p.031
Results Identity Priming in the Brain
  • Behavioral Results. N11.
  • Planned comparisons show that RT in the identity
    condition is significantly faster than RT in the
    control condition (p0.009).

p0.009
plt.0001
plt.0001
Discussion
  • MEG Results. N11. The M100 shows significantly
    more activation for the morphology condition
    than the control (p lt. 0001) and the orthography
    conditions (p lt. 0001). The M170 shows
    significantly less activation for the morphology
    condition than the control (p.031). The
    amplitude in the orthography condition is
    significantly lower than the control condition in
    M100 (plt.0001). No significant difference between
    orthography and control in M170 (p.073) or
    between morphology and orthography in M170
    (p.737).

3
Masked Priming Paradigm
  • The Masked Priming Paradigm provides a method to
    examine priming effects without conscious
    perception in early visual word form processing
    (Forster Davis 1984, Rastle et al. 2000, 2003,
    among others).
  • In masked priming, a prime is sandwiched between
    a forward mask () and a target. With short
    prime duration, the prime cannot be consciously
    perceived by the subject.
  • Identity and morphological priming effects in the
    Masked Priming Paradigm have been observed in the
    absence of semantic and orthographic priming
    effects (cf. Rastle et al. 2000, 2003 for
    behavioral studies Dehaene et al. 2001 for a
    fMRI and EEG study).
  • In the current study, we investigate the effects
    of marked priming without conscious perception in
    the brain by examining the early MEG time
    components (M100 and M170). In particular, the
    effects of identity priming (experiment 1) and
    morphological priming (experiment 2) are of
    special interest.

8
  • Our MEG data show that the M100 and M170
    components are sensitive to identity and
    morphological priming effects in the masked
    priming paradigm.
  • The identity and morphological priming
    conditions show the same pattern in the M100 and
    M170 components. This supports our hypothesis
    that morphological decomposition occurs prior to
    lexical access.
  • Unlike RT results, orthographical and
    morphological priming show a significantly
    different pattern in the brain (M100). This
    suggests that priming due to morphological
    decomposition significantly differs from priming
    due to pure graphemic overlap in visual word
    processing in the brain.
  • Localization and source activation analyses are
    required before we can definitely assign effects
    from masked priming to either the M100 (visual
    cortex) or M170 (letter string/visual word form
    area).

p.029
plt.0001
  • MEG results. N11. The amplitude in the identity
    priming condition is significantly lower than the
    amplitude in the control condition (plt.0001) at
    the M100 (negative polarity, more activation).
    The amplitude in the identity condition is also
    significantly lower than the control condition
    (p.029) at the M170 (positive polarity, less
    activation).

9
  • Dehaene, S., L. Naccache, L. Cohen, D. L.Bihan,
    J-F. Mangin, J-B. Poline, and D. Rivière (2001).
    Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and
    unconscious repetition priming. nature.
    neuroscience 4(7) 752-758.
  • Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects
    distinguishable from the effects of shared
    meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental
    Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26.
  • Forster, K.I. and C. Davis (1984). Repetition
    priming and frequency attenuation in lexical
    access. Journal of Experimental Psychology
    Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
  • Rastle, K., M.H. Davis, W.D Marslen-Wilson and
    L.K. Tyler (2000). Morphological and semantic
    effects in visual word recognition A time-course
    study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15
    (4/5), 507-537.
  • Rastle, K. and M.H. Davis (2003). Reading
    morphologically-complex words Some thoughts from
    masked priming. In Kinoshita, S. Lupker, S.J.
    (eds.) Masked priming State of the art.
    Psychology Press.
  • Tarkiainen, A, P. Helenius, P.C. Hansen, P.L.
    Cornelissen, R. Salmelin (1999). Dynamics of
    letter string perception in the human
    occipitotemporal cortex. Brain 122 2119-2131.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com