Facing our Future combining idealism with realism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Facing our Future combining idealism with realism

Description:

A private contractors point of view. one of the leading private players in the UK municipal waste market ... Very fashionable. But not a new tune! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: kevin198
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Facing our Future combining idealism with realism


1
Facing our Futurecombining idealism with realism
  • Kevin Hurst
  • Marketing Director

2
Onyx
  • A private contractors point of view
  • one of the leading private players in the UK
    municipal waste market
  • experience since first days of CCT
  • real exposure to the business
  • international benchmarking experience

3
Facing our Future
  • Current status
  • The future - what lies ahead how will we cope?
  • The spread of options offered - realistic
    idealism

4
UK Municipal Waste Market
  • Constant growth during the past five years -
    average of 2.3
  • Contributing factors
  • Number of households
  • Lifestyle
  • GDP
  • Population

Source DEFRA, Onyx
5
Municipal Waste per Capita
  • Constant growth during the past five years -
    annual average of 2.8
  • Greater than the overall waste market growth
  • Population continues to be more wasteful

Source DEFRA, Onyx
6
UK Household Waste Volumesper Capita - 1991 to
2001
Ten year increase of 20
Population increase 3.6 GDP increase 70.0
Source National Statistics 2002,DEFRA
7
UK/USA Household Waste Volumes - 2001
  • UK inhabitants produce 503kg of household waste
    per person per year - among the highest volume in
    Europe
  • The USA per capita for recycling is almost four
    times greater than the UKs 57kg

UK USA
Source EPA, DEFRA
8
Realism
  • GDP and waste production are intrinsically locked
    together
  • No country has been able to disconnect this
    upward evolution
  • Western Europe follows USA behaviour

9
UK Population / HouseholdsEstimates
  • 7.3 decade growth
  • Occupancy down to 2.36 from 2.45
  • 3.3 decade growth
  • Peak expected in 2040

Source National Statistics 2002
10
Social Trends
  • Population life expectancy increasing
  • Births remaining constant
  • Housing stock growing - more home alone
  • Less terraced housing - more home ownership
  • Disposable income increasing
  • Higher levels of social activity - more free time
  • gardening (more green waste)
  • more takeouts (pre-pack meals)
  • time is the essence but there is less time for
    civism

11
UK Municipal Waste Market Estimates
  • Waste volumes increasing
  • Estimate 39 million tonnes by 2006 (UK municipal
    waste) - 15 increase over current levels.

Source DEFRA, Onyx
12
Annual AverageBin Content
  • Paper/board 29
  • Green waste 21
  • Food waste 16
  • Plastic 13
  • Glass 7
  • Other 14

Source North West Environmental Trust, November
2001
13
Moving Goalposts
  • Bin content is highly seasonal in certain waste
    streams
  • green waste moves from 6.1 (winter) to 29.9
    (spring)
  • food waste moves from 21.8 (winter) to 12.6
    (spring)
  • What do we do with the resource during low
    periods ?
  • To comply at any time we will need to oversize
  • Green waste and food waste expected to increase
    in volume
  • Service providers must be very flexible to
    provide an economic waste collection/recycling
    service that is sustainable

14
Inhouse / Private Enterprise
Refuse Collection Contract Volume Market Share-
England 2001
Source Onyx
15
Inhouse/Private Enterprise
  • Current
  • high risk (cost) to win
  • no sanity in market share (only vanity)
  • pressure from
  • more regulation (transport)
  • HS concerns
  • Union claims
  • driver shortage
  • full employment
  • fuel/insurance costs out of control
  • lack of flexibility to pay the going rate

16
Inhouse/Private Enterprise
  • The Future
  • less players/less choice - estimate a 5 swing to
    DSO control of refuse collection contracts (70/30
    split) by 2006
  • selective tendering - No more Martini approach
  • An integrated approach only occurs in isolated
    cases (Hampshire, IoW Sheffield) - the
    practice will spread

17
An Integrated Approach
  • An industry buzz statement but has a double
    meaning/requirement
  • a range of collection treatment methods used to
    achieve an objective
  • consumers, government and service partners must
    work in harmony

18
Idealism
  • How are we going to cope with push and pull -
    increased volumes of waste and more stringent EU
    regulation
  • General consensus
  • reduce - reuse ?
  • recycle
  • recover

19
Look global but ...
  • Complex and serious situation - 21st century
    issue
  • No catchall answer
  • Each option has its place
  • Waste is a local issue..
  • . with
    local solutions
  • We should never forget this when peering over our
    neighbours fence

20
Sustainable Development
  • Very fashionable
  • But not a new tune!
  • We in the waste industry have been singing the
    chorus for some time
  • Sustainability at what cost ?
  • Will the public pay?
  • MORI/ESTET research shows that cost is very
    misunderstood
  • education
  • communication

21
Sustainability
  • Sustainability needs markets plus the outcome
    needs to be less environmentally intrusive than
    the original starting point
  • Thinking acting local
  • Modern tools can help dispel myths and give us
    the best route for local success
  • impact studies
  • life cycle analysis
  • environmental impact studies

22
Future Direction
  • The waste industry does not have to define or
    orientate the UKs waste strategy
  • We have to comply but not direct
  • Waste industry should be viewed as
    consultants/partners - advising best
    methods/options
  • Encourage viable options when the route looks
    like a cul de sac

23
Landfill
  • Landfill will as a disposal option remain
    dominant for the majority of waste producers
  • Even with planned tax rises, landfill will still
    remain the most cost effective route
  • Advanced technologically
  • sealed/lined cells
  • 95 of biogas is collected
  • leachate treated to high standards

24
Fact
  • Countries that do not opt for incineration
    generally have high levels of landfill and low
    levels of recycling
  • Portugal 87
  • Greece 92

Source OECD Compendium 1999
25
Energy from Waste
  • We envy other nations recycling levels but
    ignore their integrated policies
  • Does incineration block recycling ?
  • The Green Gang - recycling/efw ratio
  • Switzerland 42-45
  • Germany 41-18
  • Denmark 31-58
  • Holland 46-42
  • Sweden 37-38

26
Energy from Waste
  • Emission treatment accounts for- 50 of space and
    cost in a modern plant
  • Modern plants - safer to live next to rather than
    the M25

27
Recycling
  • Slow progress (UK)
  • USA municipalities with efw average 33 recycling
    rates compared with a national average of 28
  • Onward and upward recycling rates are not forever

Source EPA, DEFRA
28
Recycling
  • Costs outweigh the benefits
  • about turn/reduced recycling by major cities (New
    York, Paris)
  • Topical issues
  • landfill tax
  • investment
  • direct charging
  • education

29
Summary
  • We face a serious challenge
  • Targets are possible
  • Need to tackle the sustainability issue
  • No ideal mass plan - integrated local
  • Investment needs to be made on facts not shifting
    sands
  • Act now or we will pay later !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com