Title: MISSION STATEMENT
1MISSION STATEMENT
- The Academic Planning Committee has been asked
to conduct a comprehensive review of HPUs
academic programs. As conceptualized to date,
this task involves asking several basic
questions - Does the curriculum adequately balance core,
elective, and major courses? - Does the curriculum address contemporary global
ethical issues and reflect - recent advances in knowledge and technology?
- Does the curriculum impart to students skills
and values that are consistent - with the University's mission and the world
students will enter? - Does the curriculum maximize student engagement
and retention? - Does the curriculum present a vision in which
the various academic - disciplines and programs are tied together in
a logical, integrated, and - cohesive way?
- Following careful deliberation in which inputs
will be solicited from all segments of the
Universitys academic community, the Committee
will make recommendations designed to promote
excellence, rigor, and thematic cohesiveness
while allowing students greater choice in course
selection. The Committee will periodically update
the faculty on its progress and submit a final
report of recommendations to the Vice President
of Academic Affairs and the faculty for review.
2RATIONALE FOR CURRICULAR CHANGE
-
-
- The emphasis of the core on skills based
knowledge would be a shift away from the content
based approach of the current core. This
approach would be much more amenable to the
experiential learning focus of the Universitys
QEP and would require no change in the four-year
development of the themes of self, society, world
and career. The Freshman year should be a time
for exploration of different fields without the
requirement that students cover the entire ground
of 21st Century knowledge. Today, many of our
students enter University with college level AP
course work, and credits from on-line college
courses taken in High School. These same
students complain that our Freshmen year, with
its lack of choice and many requirements, is just
like another year of High School. Academic
performance and retention would be enhanced if we
could offer Freshman exciting self-selected
courses from the first day of their college
careers. The heart and spirit of a vibrant
curriculum lies in the students being
co-inquirers with the faculty while the faculty
pursues real research in their fields. An
engaged curriculum also depends on the community
of inquiry that is established both within and
between the faculties of different disciplines.
Such a learning community must be inquisitive,
cooperative, innovative, and up to date it must
dedicated to inquiry, not the simple conveyance
of knowledge. Faculty can model the methods and
techniques of their discipline at an introductory
level. The students need to be seen by the
faculty as co-inquirers and they must see us
model the research and activities that define our
fields. This modeling should represent real
inquiry or real creation not a simple recitation
of the accepted dogma of the field that amounts
to going through the motions. Such inquiry
requires active discovery on the part of the
faculty and the students. This means exploring
the margins and the cutting edge of different
disciplines it means being uninhibited by
traditional disciplinary boundaries and
definitions, and it entails pursuing questions
where ever they may lead. The inner core would be
a requirement for all graduates of the
University. The Freshman and Sophomore emphasis
of the inner core would be on analytic,
quantitative, writing, language, and speaking
skills while the Junior and Senior years would
shift emphasis to affinity and maturity
requirements. With only nine required hours in
the Freshman year that year will be open for
exploration through specialized electives offered
through departments. Every department should
offer at least one special topics course specific
to its discipline. These courses would be
modeled on the thematic honors courses being
offered in the Summer program. Introductory
survey courses in the major should be reserved by
departments for the sophomore year To this end we
suggest that introductory major survey courses
should be moved to the 200 level to serve as
introductions to the majorafter the fashion of
Psychology 201/Sociology 201/Political Science
201/Economics201. Elective courses offered in
the Freshman year would provide an exciting
entrée into discipline specific study and
practicums, and would provide students with the
background necessary to appreciate the broader
issues raised by the second-year survey courses
within the disciplines. -
- Professional degrees with their increasing
emphasis on specialization, accreditation, and
the profession are in danger of losing sight of
the Universitys mission there is a need to
frame major degrees in terms of the larger goals
of the academy and the changing nature of the
world we live. Students should not be locked
into their majors Sophomore year with no further
opportunity to explore other disciplines. - The purpose of the affinity requirement is to
give students a deeper understanding of the areas
most connected to their major while the purpose
of the maturity requirement is to make sure this
knowledge is in depth. Elective hours can be
assigned to areas to ensure a broader coverage of
the academy. - The rationale for the reinstatement of
interdisciplinary and cross disciplinary studies
is at the heart of a liberal education. Many of
the most interesting questions in various
disciplines lie at the overlap of two different
fields. The faculty and the students would all
benefit from the study and perspective of
disciplines outside of their own. Course design
will have to emphasize the scope, depth, and
interconnectedness of all fields of knowledge
3ELECTIVES
MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
YR III
YR II
YR I
CORE REQUIREMENTS
CURRENT CONFIGURATION
4MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
YR III
CORE REQUIREMENTS
YR II
YR I
ELECTIVES
ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION
5WORKING OBJECTIVES
- Spread core courses over all four years
- Decrease the number of specifically-designated
core courses - Orient University core courses toward the
development of intellectual skills (analytic,
quantitative, communicative) - Encourage co-inquiry among students and faculty
in all courses - Offer more electives to freshmen
- Increase the number of electives beyond
introductory levels - Decrease the number of courses required for
majors without compromising requirements related
to professional competency and/or accreditation - Ensure that 200-level, 300-level, and 400-level
courses reflect progressively more advanced skill
and knowledge components (maturity requirements) - Expose students within majors to courses in
allied fields - Expand interdisciplinary studies and/or
interdepartmental courses (both as electives and
as Majors courses) - Ensure that the curriculum is responsive to broad
societal changes (e.g., globalization and
technological change) - Allow and selectively encourage self-designed
majors
6ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
- Patch Revise Minimal Change to Existing
Curriculum - Going Further Moderate Change to Curriculum
- Extensive Revision Incorporating Distribution
Requirements Within the Curriculum
7PATCH AND REVISE MINIMAL CHANGE TO EXISTING
CURRICULUM
- Add May and/or January Session
- Introduce Programs to Challenge/ Engage
First-Year Students - Summer Reading
- Field Trips
- Orientation Around Student-Selected Activities
- Extend Summer Honors Academy Concept
8GOING FURTHER MODERATE CHANGE TO CURRICULUM
- Reduce First-Year Core Requirements
- Offer Electives During Freshman Year
- Create Thematic 100-Level Courses to Stimulate
Excitement for Learning, Encourage Critical
Thinking, and Introduce Fields of Study - Move Introductory Survey Courses to 200-Level
- Make Courses 4-Credit hours rather than 3 Change
Faculty Load to 321 or 33, etc.
9SUBSTANTIVE REVISION INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTION
REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE CURRICULUM
- Elective Requirements
- Maturity Requirements
- Affinity Requirements
10ELECTIVE REQUIREMENTS
- Require x Number of Elective Hours throughout the
Four Years - Require Juniors to take x Number of GBS, IDS,
Cultural Immersion, Language, or Study Abroad
Courses - Requirements to be Defined by University
- Objectives Served (1), (2), (5), (6), (7), (10),
(11), (12)
11MATURITY REQUIREMENTS
- Require x Number of Courses at each Level (200,
300 and 400) for Courses Outside the Core and
Majors - Ensure that Sophomore, Junior, and Senior Courses
Reflect Progressively more Advanced Skill and
Knowledge Components - Exclude Seniors from 100-Level Courses
- Requirements to be Defined by University
- Objectives Served (3), (5), (8), (11), (12)
12AFFINITY REQUIREMENTS
- For each Major, Require Students to take x Number
of Credit Hours in One or More Allied Fields of
Study - Require Students to take x Number of Hours
Outside their Departments in an Allied Field
(200-Level or above) - Count IDS Courses toward Elective and Affinity
(not Major) Requirements - Requirements to be Defined by University
- Objectives Served (4), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11)
13MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
Maturity Requirements 200, 300, 400 Affinity
Requirements After Major is declared 200 and
above Elective Requirements 300 and below
YR III
CORE REQUIREMENTS
YR II
YR I
ELECTIVES
14CURRICULAR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
Inner Core
Major Requirements
Affinity Requirements
Maturity Requirements
Elective Requirements
15STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
Major
Inner Core
Outer Core
Affinity (Allied Electives)
Electives
Maturity (Upper Division Electives)
16REQUIREMENTS AND JURISDICTIONS
Core (Set by University)
Major (Set by Department)
Same for all degrees
Affinity (Set by University)
Maturity (Set by University)
Electives (Student-Selected within Set Parameters)
17SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION
MATURITY
AFFINITY
MAJORS
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
CORE
ELECTIVES
SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCES