MISSION STATEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

MISSION STATEMENT

Description:

... in the four-year development of the themes of self, society, world and career. ... to the major after the fashion of Psychology 201/Sociology 201/Political ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: clintco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MISSION STATEMENT


1
MISSION STATEMENT
  • The Academic Planning Committee has been asked
    to conduct a comprehensive review of HPUs
    academic programs. As conceptualized to date,
    this task involves asking several basic
    questions
  • Does the curriculum adequately balance core,
    elective, and major courses?
  • Does the curriculum address contemporary global
    ethical issues and reflect
  • recent advances in knowledge and technology?
  • Does the curriculum impart to students skills
    and values that are consistent
  • with the University's mission and the world
    students will enter?
  • Does the curriculum maximize student engagement
    and retention?
  • Does the curriculum present a vision in which
    the various academic
  • disciplines and programs are tied together in
    a logical, integrated, and
  • cohesive way?
  • Following careful deliberation in which inputs
    will be solicited from all segments of the
    Universitys academic community, the Committee
    will make recommendations designed to promote
    excellence, rigor, and thematic cohesiveness
    while allowing students greater choice in course
    selection. The Committee will periodically update
    the faculty on its progress and submit a final
    report of recommendations to the Vice President
    of Academic Affairs and the faculty for review.

2
RATIONALE FOR CURRICULAR CHANGE
  • The emphasis of the core on skills based
    knowledge would be a shift away from the content
    based approach of the current core. This
    approach would be much more amenable to the
    experiential learning focus of the Universitys
    QEP and would require no change in the four-year
    development of the themes of self, society, world
    and career. The Freshman year should be a time
    for exploration of different fields without the
    requirement that students cover the entire ground
    of 21st Century knowledge. Today, many of our
    students enter University with college level AP
    course work, and credits from on-line college
    courses taken in High School. These same
    students complain that our Freshmen year, with
    its lack of choice and many requirements, is just
    like another year of High School. Academic
    performance and retention would be enhanced if we
    could offer Freshman exciting self-selected
    courses from the first day of their college
    careers. The heart and spirit of a vibrant
    curriculum lies in the students being
    co-inquirers with the faculty while the faculty
    pursues real research in their fields. An
    engaged curriculum also depends on the community
    of inquiry that is established both within and
    between the faculties of different disciplines.
    Such a learning community must be inquisitive,
    cooperative, innovative, and up to date it must
    dedicated to inquiry, not the simple conveyance
    of knowledge. Faculty can model the methods and
    techniques of their discipline at an introductory
    level. The students need to be seen by the
    faculty as co-inquirers and they must see us
    model the research and activities that define our
    fields. This modeling should represent real
    inquiry or real creation not a simple recitation
    of the accepted dogma of the field that amounts
    to going through the motions. Such inquiry
    requires active discovery on the part of the
    faculty and the students. This means exploring
    the margins and the cutting edge of different
    disciplines it means being uninhibited by
    traditional disciplinary boundaries and
    definitions, and it entails pursuing questions
    where ever they may lead. The inner core would be
    a requirement for all graduates of the
    University. The Freshman and Sophomore emphasis
    of the inner core would be on analytic,
    quantitative, writing, language, and speaking
    skills while the Junior and Senior years would
    shift emphasis to affinity and maturity
    requirements. With only nine required hours in
    the Freshman year that year will be open for
    exploration through specialized electives offered
    through departments. Every department should
    offer at least one special topics course specific
    to its discipline. These courses would be
    modeled on the thematic honors courses being
    offered in the Summer program. Introductory
    survey courses in the major should be reserved by
    departments for the sophomore year To this end we
    suggest that introductory major survey courses
    should be moved to the 200 level to serve as
    introductions to the majorafter the fashion of
    Psychology 201/Sociology 201/Political Science
    201/Economics201. Elective courses offered in
    the Freshman year would provide an exciting
    entrée into discipline specific study and
    practicums, and would provide students with the
    background necessary to appreciate the broader
    issues raised by the second-year survey courses
    within the disciplines.
  • Professional degrees with their increasing
    emphasis on specialization, accreditation, and
    the profession are in danger of losing sight of
    the Universitys mission there is a need to
    frame major degrees in terms of the larger goals
    of the academy and the changing nature of the
    world we live. Students should not be locked
    into their majors Sophomore year with no further
    opportunity to explore other disciplines.
  • The purpose of the affinity requirement is to
    give students a deeper understanding of the areas
    most connected to their major while the purpose
    of the maturity requirement is to make sure this
    knowledge is in depth. Elective hours can be
    assigned to areas to ensure a broader coverage of
    the academy.
  • The rationale for the reinstatement of
    interdisciplinary and cross disciplinary studies
    is at the heart of a liberal education. Many of
    the most interesting questions in various
    disciplines lie at the overlap of two different
    fields. The faculty and the students would all
    benefit from the study and perspective of
    disciplines outside of their own. Course design
    will have to emphasize the scope, depth, and
    interconnectedness of all fields of knowledge

3
ELECTIVES
MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
YR III
YR II
YR I
CORE REQUIREMENTS
CURRENT CONFIGURATION
4
MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
YR III
CORE REQUIREMENTS
YR II
YR I
ELECTIVES
ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION
5
WORKING OBJECTIVES
  • Spread core courses over all four years
  • Decrease the number of specifically-designated
    core courses
  • Orient University core courses toward the
    development of intellectual skills (analytic,
    quantitative, communicative)
  • Encourage co-inquiry among students and faculty
    in all courses
  • Offer more electives to freshmen
  • Increase the number of electives beyond
    introductory levels
  • Decrease the number of courses required for
    majors without compromising requirements related
    to professional competency and/or accreditation
  • Ensure that 200-level, 300-level, and 400-level
    courses reflect progressively more advanced skill
    and knowledge components (maturity requirements)
  • Expose students within majors to courses in
    allied fields
  • Expand interdisciplinary studies and/or
    interdepartmental courses (both as electives and
    as Majors courses)
  • Ensure that the curriculum is responsive to broad
    societal changes (e.g., globalization and
    technological change)
  • Allow and selectively encourage self-designed
    majors

6
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES
  • Patch Revise Minimal Change to Existing
    Curriculum
  • Going Further Moderate Change to Curriculum
  • Extensive Revision Incorporating Distribution
    Requirements Within the Curriculum

7
PATCH AND REVISE MINIMAL CHANGE TO EXISTING
CURRICULUM
  • Add May and/or January Session
  • Introduce Programs to Challenge/ Engage
    First-Year Students
  • Summer Reading
  • Field Trips
  • Orientation Around Student-Selected Activities
  • Extend Summer Honors Academy Concept

8
GOING FURTHER MODERATE CHANGE TO CURRICULUM
  • Reduce First-Year Core Requirements
  • Offer Electives During Freshman Year
  • Create Thematic 100-Level Courses to Stimulate
    Excitement for Learning, Encourage Critical
    Thinking, and Introduce Fields of Study
  • Move Introductory Survey Courses to 200-Level
  • Make Courses 4-Credit hours rather than 3 Change
    Faculty Load to 321 or 33, etc.

9
SUBSTANTIVE REVISION INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTION
REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE CURRICULUM
  • Elective Requirements
  • Maturity Requirements
  • Affinity Requirements

10
ELECTIVE REQUIREMENTS
  • Require x Number of Elective Hours throughout the
    Four Years
  • Require Juniors to take x Number of GBS, IDS,
    Cultural Immersion, Language, or Study Abroad
    Courses
  • Requirements to be Defined by University
  • Objectives Served (1), (2), (5), (6), (7), (10),
    (11), (12)

11
MATURITY REQUIREMENTS
  • Require x Number of Courses at each Level (200,
    300 and 400) for Courses Outside the Core and
    Majors
  • Ensure that Sophomore, Junior, and Senior Courses
    Reflect Progressively more Advanced Skill and
    Knowledge Components
  • Exclude Seniors from 100-Level Courses
  • Requirements to be Defined by University
  • Objectives Served (3), (5), (8), (11), (12)

12
AFFINITY REQUIREMENTS
  • For each Major, Require Students to take x Number
    of Credit Hours in One or More Allied Fields of
    Study
  • Require Students to take x Number of Hours
    Outside their Departments in an Allied Field
    (200-Level or above)
  • Count IDS Courses toward Elective and Affinity
    (not Major) Requirements
  • Requirements to be Defined by University
  • Objectives Served (4), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11)

13
MAJOR REQUIREMENTS
YR IV
Maturity Requirements 200, 300, 400 Affinity
Requirements After Major is declared 200 and
above Elective Requirements 300 and below
YR III
CORE REQUIREMENTS
YR II
YR I
ELECTIVES
14
CURRICULAR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
Inner Core
Major Requirements
Affinity Requirements
Maturity Requirements
Elective Requirements
15
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
Major
Inner Core
Outer Core
Affinity (Allied Electives)
Electives
Maturity (Upper Division Electives)
16
REQUIREMENTS AND JURISDICTIONS
Core (Set by University)
Major (Set by Department)
Same for all degrees
Affinity (Set by University)
Maturity (Set by University)
Electives (Student-Selected within Set Parameters)
17
SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION
MATURITY
AFFINITY
MAJORS
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
CORE
ELECTIVES
SCHOOL OF ARTS SCIENCES
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com