Title: Designed Green Toolbox as a Built Environment Educating Method
1Designed Green Toolbox as a Built Environment
Educating Method
Usama El Fiky  Faculty of Architecture, Building
and Planning Eindhoven University of Technology
The Netherlands September 12, 2006 London
2Two Main Field of Toolbox
GADS Toolbox
1. Urban 1.1 Urban fabric 1.2 Land use
1.3 public landscape 1.4 Street design 1.5
Open space design 1.6 Transportation and
accessibility 1.7 Infrastructure
2. Architecture 2.1 Site selection 2.2
Form, zoning and orientation 2.3 Building
envelop 2.4 Construction systems 2.5
Building materials 2.6 Building facilities
and installation 2.7 private landscape
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
Building cultural indicator
GADS refinements
1.1.1 Attached houses - 33 Points 1.2.1
Mixed land use 34 Points 2.1.2
Inward design 74 Points 2.1.1 Underground
buildings - 1 Point 2.3.1 Dome for ceiling
24 Points
Conclusion
3GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Intention of the workshops 1- As a verification
process of the toolbox 2- Test the tool as
education method 3- Test the building cultural
knowledge of upcoming architects
Workshops process
Comparison Of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
4The workshop assignment Design a house unit and a
housing site in Toshka Region southwest desert in
Egypt -Technical University Eindhoven The
Netherlands -Alexandria University Egypt
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison Of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
5Dutch students projects 1
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
6Dutch students projects 2
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
7Dutch students projects 3
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
8Dutch students projects 4
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
9Egyptian students projects 1
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
10Egyptian students projects 2
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
11Egyptian students projects 3
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
12Egyptian students projects 4
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
13GADS refinements
GADS Toolbox
1-An easy technique for adding new items 2-A
constraints technique for warning the user
3-More information explaining why such design
strategies culturally accepted 4-Showing the
total culture indicator and green certificate
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
14GADS software interface
GADS Toolbox
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
15GADS Toolbox
Conclusion 1-A big gap between theoretical
knowledge and application exists in the field of
architectural education. The Toolbox presents a
learning bridge to overcome this gap through a
direct facilitating process, which proves to be
of great help. 2-There is a lack of knowledge
concerning the Egyptian building culture and its
expected influence on the design process among
upcoming architects (the students). This finding
supports the research approach and hypothesis.
3-Developing a software version for the toolbox
in order to adapted most of the refinements
generated by the students such as -Adding new
items -Constraints -Showing total culture
indicators and green certificates for the whole
project -Free movement among toolbox
chapters -More information
Intention of the workshops
Workshops process
Comparison of the students project
GADS refinements
Conclusion
16Thank you and welcome for any questions