Title: Deforestation: good or bad
1Deforestation good or bad?
Satellite observation of deforestation in the Rio
Branco area in Brazil http//veimages.gsfc.nasa.go
v/2180/PIA03427.jpg
2http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- Causes of deforestation
- Deforestation happens naturally from time to
time via wildfires. Trees, plants, and animals
all recover from such events naturally indeed,
some benefit from a fire. Bird such as the
black-backed woodpecker thrive ONLY in freshly
burned areas, where they eat insects that bore
into the burned trees. Some trees such as the
lodgepole pine produce serrotonous cones, cones
that are fused shut and only open when a wildfire
cooks the cone, thereby spreading the seeds into
a freshly burned area with little other
competition. Over time, burned areas regrow into
forests. For an example, a visit to Yellowstone
National Park today reveals a forest that is 20
years old (major fires burned much of the park in
1988) and filled with medium-height lodgepole
pines.
3http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- People cause deforestation for a number of
reasons. The action is not always permanent some
countries are better at replanting forests than
others.
4http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- Trees can be converted into paper or wood, two
products that human civilization uses daily. In
some parts of the world, wood is still a major
source of fuel for cooking and heating. Chances
are wood is a major component of your home's
structure, the main use for timber in the U.S.
Wood may be used to build furniture, cabinetry,
or other products. Paper is used in many ways.
5http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- Trees may be cut down for forest management
reasons, also. One reason is to limit a
wildfire's ability to spread. This may be done in
an emergency to combat an active fire, or in a
methodically planned long-term harvest.
Typically, the forest is allowed to recover, and
it does in a period of decades.
6http//www.mongabay.com/rates_asia.htm
- Many Asian-countries have entered a period of
sustained spectacular economic growth in the past
few years, resulting in the increased consumption
of forest resources.
7http//www.mongabay.com/rates_asia.htm
8http//www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID07
-P13-00017segmentID2
- Biofuels are boomingthings like ethanol from
corn and sugar cane, and diesel derived from palm
oil, are attracting interest and investment
worldwide. The European Union has set an
ambitious target to replace nearly six percent
of petroleum with biofuels in just the next three
years. - That will take a lot of plants, and a lot of
cropland that Europe simply does not have. So the
E.U. is looking to the developing world,
particularly Southeast Asia.
9http//www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID07
-P13-00017segmentID2
- Approx. three million acres of biodiesel to
replace one percent of the needs of the European
Union. Probably that crop would come from
Southeast Asia and mainly at the moment would be
from Malaysia and Indonesia, oil palm, which is
the main favorite crop for exchanging biodiesel.
(Courtesy of U.S. DOE Genome Programs)
10Arguments provided from http//wiki.answers.com/Q/
What_are_the_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_defor
estation
- All plants consume carbon dioxide, some consume
more than others. Young, rapidly-growing plants
consume much more carbon dioxide, on a per acre
basis, than mature trees. Moreover, in an
unmanaged forest, net carbon dioxide consumption
is actually zero. This is because when trees die,
they rot, and in doing so release all of the
carbon stored over their lives, to combine with
oxygen in the atmosphere to form carbon dioxide.
In a mature, unmanaged forest, the carbon dioxide
released by dying trees balances that being
consumed by living trees, and the net is zero. To
some extent, trees can store carbon in the soil
beneath them, slightly lowering the amount that
is released into the atmosphere when they die.
However, in rain forests in particular, the soils
are very thin and cannot contain much carbon at
all. Also, the Amazon Rain Forest is home to
about half of all insects in the world, and
insects produce more carbon dioxide, just by
breathing, than all human activities, including
fossil fuel burning.
11http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- If the Amazon Rain Forest were harvested (not
burned, just cut) and replanted with a
fast-growing species of tree (pine), and that new
forest was managed carefully (including regular
harvesting) to maximize carbon dioxide
consumption and sequestration, we would be much
better off in terms of carbon dioxide
consumption. When the trees (both the initial
rain forest trees and the replacement pine trees)
are cut, they would be converted to lumber, or
simply treated to prevent rotting, making them
very efficient long-term carbon storage devices,
and keeping billions of tons of carbon dioxide
out of the atmosphere. I've done the
calculations, and with the combination of higher
carbon dioxide consumption by plants and lower
carbon dioxide production by insects (they would
die when they lose their habitat), we would need
to cut only about 1/6 of the Amazon Rain Forest
to completely offset all human-industrial carbon
dioxide emissions. - One more note. Burning the forest is not a good
idea. Burning immediately releases carbon into
the atmosphere to form carbon dioxide, as opposed
to the gradual process that occurs when the trees
die and rot.
12http//wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_advantages_
and_disadvantages_of_deforestation
- The downside to deforestation
- Areas that are cleared of trees, especially in
tropical rainforests, can be very sensitive to
deforestation. Tropical rainforests have only a
thin layer of topsoil that is easily eroded away
if there is no vegetation holding it in place.
Animals that are adapted to live in the forest
usually cannot survive out in the open. Forests
act as a heat sink the process of photosynthesis
actually makes the atmosphere cooler as the tree
"breathes." Forests also trap moisture and
increase humidity the trees aspire, or give off,
water as a byproduct of photosynthesis. Without
the forests creating a reserve of moisture and
water, this water evaporates and becomes useless
to any animals.
13http//blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/category
/deforestation/
- Maybe Money Can Grow On Trees
-
- Posted by Keith Johnson
-
- Tom Wright reports from Indonesia
- Policy-makers around the world are realizing
that saving the trees is crucial to cutting
greenhouse-gas emissions. Now, the financiers are
jumping in. - Shedding some light on forest conservation
(Wikipedia) - Natsource Asset Management today announced a
deal to buy 60,000 tons of carbon credits from a
privately-owned California redwood forest managed
by the Pacific Forest Trust. Thats the first
deal done under the Forest Protocols, a new set
of standards drafted last year by the California
Air Resources Board. - Forests are huge carbon sinks when they are left
intact, and deforestation accounts for about 20
of the carbon dioxide spewed into the atmosphere
each year. The United Nations agreed in December
at its climate-change conference in Bali to make
intact forests at least as valuable as felled
ones. The preferred recipe is to allow
forest-conservation projects to generate carbon
credits. - But unlike other emissions-cutting activities,
such as replacing coal-fired power plants with
cleaner technology, policy-makers have struggled
to make forest conservation part of the
climate-change arsenal. Thats partly because of
fears that if one forest were protected, the
chainsaws would just move to another place. -
- Until now, forest sequestration has been an
untapped asset in the effort to address climate
change, said Jack Cogen, chief executive of
Natsource, in a press release. This deal
illustrates that when rigorous, clear rules are
adopted, these investments can reduce costs for
our compliance customers and provide what we
believe are attractive investment opportunities.
-
- Natsource bought the credits on behalf of hedge
funds and private equity, which can trade the
credits like any other commodity. Other customers
of Pacific Forest Trust include California
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who burnished his
public-image, if not his bottom line, by buying
offsets for his air travel from the same forest. -
14- Should Malaysia and Indonesia conserve their
million of acres and benefit from carbon credits?
Or use their crops for exchanging biodiesel?