Users with Special Needs: Age, Lower Literacy, Disabilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Users with Special Needs: Age, Lower Literacy, Disabilities

Description:

Using search engines to find desired content ... Navigating through Page Content ... Learn the cognitive and biological science behind the behaviors you see it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: kathryn45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Users with Special Needs: Age, Lower Literacy, Disabilities


1
Users with Special Needs Age, Lower Literacy,
Disabilities
  • Kathryn Summers
  • 2004

2
Older users
  • Older users comprise 13 of US population 34.5
    million in 2001 (perhaps 10 million in 2050).
  • About 13-16 of seniors used the internet in
    2001. Will grow to 51 by 2015 as boomers retire.
  • Older users are often less experienced web users,
    and are likely to face some physical and
    cognitive impairment. (58 or 20 million suffer
    chronic joint pain.)

3
Older users and Web usability
  • Usability testing shows that age effects are
    smallest for tasks that depend on knowledge and
    experience. They are largest for tasks that
    depend on speed.
  • Older users have trouble finding informationthey
    do not seem to perceive information scent as
    strongly as younger users.

4
Older usersCognitive issues
  • Some older users face cognitive impairments as
    they age
  • A reduced ability to divide attention between
    tasks, slower and more laborious switching of
    attention between tasks
  • Decreased working memory capacity
  • Decreased visual search performance
  • Increased time to access long-term memory

5
Older usersEmotional issues
  • Older users are sometimes more vulnerable to
    frustration, anxiety, and self-blame.
  • Because many Web sites are less usable for older
    users, such users may also experience "learned
    failure." Previous bad experiences damage users'
    confidence that the information is available or
    that they can find information. When faced with
    difficulties, such users may give up quickly.

6
Older usersCoping strategies
  • Thorough readingmultiple studies show that older
    users are more likely to carefully read all info
    on a page before moving on
  • Cautious clickinga reluctance to click on links
    unless they are sure they have found what they
    want
  • Seeking help from peers or family members

7
Older users--Vision issues
  • Many older users experience some degree of vision
    impairment
  • Reduced acuity
  • Reduced color perception (especially the
    green/blue/violet range)
  • Reduced contrast discrimination
  • Increased sensitivity to glare (consider using
    off-white backgrounds rather than pure white)
  • Decreased visual search performance
  • Reduced focusing abilitydifficulty following
    objects in motion
  • Reduced field of view

8
Older usersMotor Issues
  • Movements may take longer for older users. Both
    typing and moving the mouse take more time and
    effort. In testing, tasks that required 3 or more
    clicks were experienced as time-consuming and
    difficult for older users.
  • Older users experience dramatically reduced time
    on task and reduced error rate if Web designers
    use "sticky" links (30 reduction of the cursor's
    gain ratio as you near the link gain ratio
    returns to normal after passing the link).
    (Georgia Institute of Technology study, 1997).

9
Lower-literacy users
  • Its harder for many American adults to read than
    you might think. The National Adult Literacy
    Survey (2003) by the U.S. Department of Education
    estimates that
  • Up to 23 of the US population is functionally
    illiterate
  • Nearly 50 of US adults, or 90 million people,
    read at the 8th grade level or below
  • Most Web sites are written at the 12th grade
    level or above.

10
Lower literacy users struggle with
  • Using search engines to find desired content
  • Navigating to desired information on individual
    sites
  • Reading content whenor ifthey find it

11
Navigating through page contentreading every word
  • Reading is hard for lower-literacy users. It
    takes a great deal of concentration and effort.
    Most lower-literacy users cant grasp the
    structure of the page at a glance by reading
    headings and subheadings. Some lower-literacy
    users compensate by reading every word on the
    page so that they dont miss the answer.
  • Similar thorough reading has been reported for
    older users and less Web-experienced users.

12
Skipping chunks of text
  • When confronted by long, dense pages of text,
    some lower-literacy users simply skip chunks of
    text. Ironically, such users would sometimes end
    up skipping over the content they wantedeven if
    the target content was appropriately signaled by
    a heading, a well-chunked paragraph, or a
    bulleted list.
  • This skipping was clearly not the same as the
    scanning behaviors employed by more literate
    userson longer pages with multiple paragraphs,
    the lower-literacy users would often skip right
    over headings and lists in order to land in the
    middle of a paragraph.

13
Triggers for skipping
  • Skipping seemed to be triggered most often by
  • Long paragraphs of dense text
  • Long sentences with complex syntax
  • Long pages requiring scrolling
  • Numbers contained in the text
  • Difficult, long, or unfamiliar words
  • Parenthetical text

14
Hopping from link to link
  • Some low-literacy users tried to minimize the
    amount of reading they would have to do by
    focusing on finding links instead of reading
    content. These users skipped from link to link
    throughout the site, sometimes ignoring page
    content completely. Such users had very low rates
    of task success.
  • When asked, users said they were hoping to arrive
    at more focused information. Users who relied on
    this strategy sometimes landed on pages with
    their desired content but did not see it.

15
"Satisficing" quickly
  • Because looking for additional information
    requires more reading, lower-literacy users tend
    to decide they have enough information relatively
    soon.
  • This frequently meant settling for answers that
    were incomplete or misleadingly vague. Marketing
    speak was particularly difficult for such readers
    to process.
  • Clearly, the most important information needs to
    appear first in its contextwhether on a page, in
    a paragraph, or in a list.

16
Users with Vision Loss
  • Users with vision loss typically rely on
    screenreaders to access and navigate the Web.
  • Screenreaders cannot read graphics they read the
    associated ALT text. To optimize pages for users
    with reduced vision, minimize the use of
    graphics. All graphics should be accompanied by
    simple ALT text that makes sense without seeing
    the image, and a LONGDESC description that
    thoroughly describes the image. Or refer users to
    an alternate source for the information contained
    in the graphic.
  • Screen readers can be set to read only the links
    on a page rather than the content. Visually
    impaired users have a higher rate of task success
    when the number of links on a page is limited.

17
Navigating through Page Content
  • A large research study of visually impaired users
    conducted by the Nielsen Norman Group observed
    several of the same strategies for navigating
    through page content that our study observed in
    lower-literacy users.
  • Thorough reading
  • Link hopping
  • Skipping

18
Reading or listening to every word
  • Some users who depend on assistive technology
    know that it is easy to miss key content or key
    links, so they carefully listen to all the
    content on every page before choosing any links
    or performing any actions.

19
Hopping from link to link
  • Some users who depend on screen readers set the
    screen reader to read only the links on a page.
    Such users may end up skipping from link to link
    within the site, and may not know when they have
    arrived at a page with desired content.
  • Task success can be increased for these users by
    minimizing the number of links on each page and
    including a page headline that is read first by a
    screen reader, so that users can immediately
    identify page content.

20
Skipping chunks of text
  • Because listening to a page or moving through a
    magnified page can be agonizingly slow, some
    users with vision loss will attempt to skip
    ahead. But because they cannot see what they are
    skipping, such users will sometimes skip over the
    content or link that they want.

21
Triggers for skipping
  • Skipping seemed to be triggered most often by
  • Long strings of parameter descriptions associated
    with page formatting, such as scripting, tables
    used to format content, or long lists of mostly
    irrelevant links
  • Long paragraphs of dense text
  • Long pages requiring scrolling
  • Parenthetical text

22
Conclusion
  • Look for design solutions that meet the needs of
    diverse user groups.
  • Do actual testing with representative users.
    There is no substitute for watching real users do
    real tasks.
  • Learn the cognitive and biological science behind
    the behaviors you seeit facilitates persuasion.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com