Title: QOL
1Development of a Patients Concerns Inventory
(PCI) a way of improving out-patient
consultation patient empowerment
2www.headandneckcancer.co.uk
INFORMATION
3Patient Concerns Inventory
- A way to help recognise unmet patient needs
- Applicable to other clinical situations
4PCI Aim
- Develop and pilot a Patients Concerns Inventory
(PCI)
5PCI Background
- Patients experience a range of problems of
different intensities, at different times - They have unmet needs
- HRQOL questionnaires can help identify patients
doing badly - BUT HRQOL questionnaires are limited by their
structure and interpretation
6PCI
- What is the Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI)?
7Patient Concerns Inventory Issues they wish to
discuss
8Patients Concerns Inventory
PCI Professions they wish to see / be referred
to
9PCI
- How was the PCI list devised?
10PCI Creation
- A synthesis of issues covered in other HR-QOL
questionnaires - Locally groups the laryngectomy support group,
head and neck support group, patient research
forum, hospital volunteers, ward and out-patient
staff and the multidisciplinary head and neck
team. - Regionally groups Merseyside and Chester Cancer
network and the Cancer Network Partnership Group
(MCCN) - National groups National Association of
Laryngectomee (NALC) committee and the
Survivorship group of the Head and Neck National
Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Clinical Studies
Group, 6th International HN QOL worshop - Patients can tick other issue so self evolving
list
11PCI Creation
- Current version
- 55 items that the patient can select from as
issues they would specifically like to talk
about in their consultation / whilst at clinic
today - Also a list of 15 people they would specifically
like to talk with either in clinic or by
referral
12PCI
- How does the PCI work in practice ?
13Identifying unmet needs
Millsopp L, Frackleton S, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A
feasibility study of computer-assisted
health-related quality of life data collection in
patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug35(8)761-4.
14Identifying unmet needs
Millsopp L, Frackleton S, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A
feasibility study of computer-assisted
health-related quality of life data collection in
patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug35(8)761-4.
15Identifying unmet needs
Millsopp L, Frackleton S, Lowe D, Rogers SN. A
feasibility study of computer-assisted
health-related quality of life data collection in
patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug35(8)761-4.
16Identifying unmet needs
17Identifying unmet needs
18Touchscreen evaluation
19Touchscreen evaluation
20Touchscreen evaluation
21Touchscreen evaluation
22Patients Concerns Inventory
Touchscreen evaluation
23PCI results
- 1st August 2007 and 30th April 2008 inclusive
- SNR patients only
- Cancer patients under follow-up
- Exclusions
- Palliative / recurrence patients
- Complex benign
- Bisphosphonate induced jaw necrosis
24Patient Concerns Inventory Issues they wish to
discuss
Rogers SN, El-Sheikha J , Lowe D. A Patients
Concerns Inventory (PCI) to reveal patients
concerns in a routine head and neck clinic a
pilot study. Oral Oncology in press
Rogers SN, Lowe D Screening for dysfunction to
promote MDT intervention using the University of
Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL)
Archives of Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery.
25PCI results
The median number of issues 3 IQR
1-6 range 0 to 21 82 selecting at least 1
issue
45 items
26PCI results
- Patients wished to talk with either in clinic or
by referral - dentist (19)
- surgeon (10)
- speech and language therapist (10)
- Range 0 to 8 with 42 selecting at least one
27PCI results
- The overall median time for completing the TST
was 8 minutes (IQR 6 to 11), range 3 to 27) -
28PCI results
- The length of the consultation with TST - median
(IQR) 8 (5 to 10) minutes -
- The length of the consultation without TST -
median (IQR) 7 (4 to 14) minutes
29PCI results
- Only in 4 instances was it quite a bit or
very much difficult for the volunteer to get
the patient to agree to complete the
touch-screen. - 17 of patients encountered quite a bit or
very much of a problem in completing the
touch-screen. - -no reading glasses
- 17 of occasions the carer had had quite a bit
or very much of an input in completing the
questions.
30PCI results
- 62 patients felt it made a very much /quite a
bit difference to their consultation - Patient comments
- -it made it a bit more personal
- - reminds me of the points I want discuss
- - allows consultation to get straight to the
point - - encourages me to talk about things I would
otherwise not discuss - -if it helps you its fine by me
31Patient derived outcomes in practice
awareness
- Sign posting the patient and carers / family in
their cancer journey
32PCI Acknowledgements
- Derek Lowe Medical statistician
- Joseph El-Sheikha Medical Student
- Ruth Sturgeon Volunteer
- Norma Barrowcliff Volunteer Department Manager
- Stephen Frackleton IT support
- The patients and carers
- Local and national patients and carers support
groups