Pesticides and the Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Pesticides and the Environment

Description:

Fate of applied insecticides and other pesticides ... Most often seen as a problem in raptors and in higher aquatic predators. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:433
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: ifasent
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pesticides and the Environment


1
Pesticides and the Environment
2
Pesticides
  • Fast acting
  • Effective
  • Emergency measure
  • - - - Environmental effects

3
Fate of applied insecticides and other pesticides
  • Some insecticide applied lands on target pests
    but some lands on
  • Natural enemies, pollinators
  • Plant (residue issues if a food crop)
  • On soil or washed off plants into soil

4
Pesticide Resistance
  • Frequent use of toxic materials can select for
    pests resistant to them (more common with insects
    and plant pathogens) minimize by
  • Rotating chemicals
  • Tolerating lower kills (less selection pressure)
    less frequent application, lower rates

5
Non-Target Effects of Pesticides
  • 1. Residues in crops or food (tolerance limits,
    regulated)
  • 2. Selection for pesticide resistance
  • 3. Direct kill of beneficial organisms (insect
    predators, pollinators, etc.)
  • 4. Enter environment
  • Air (volatilization, drift, e.g., methyl bromide)
  • Soil
  • Water (runoff or leaching)

Systemic materials !
6
Non-Target Effects of Pesticides
  • 1. Residues in crops or food (tolerance limits,
    regulated)
  • 2. Selection for pesticide resistance
  • 3. Direct kill of beneficial organisms (insect
    predators, pollinators, etc.)
  • 4. Enter environment
  • Air (volatilization, drift, e.g., methyl bromide)
  • Soil
  • Water (runoff or leaching)

Note many different kinds of nontarget effects
7
Pesticides in the Environment
8
Several different ways to classify pesticides
  • Target pest (fungicides, insecticides,
    herbicides, nematicides, acaracides,
    rodenticides, etc.)
  • Origin (natural vs synthetic product)
  • Mode of action (growth regulator, systemic,
    contact, etc.)
  • Formulation (dust, fumigant, water soluble, etc.)
  • Chemical composition

9
Environmental Effects Depend on Chemistry
When compounds break down, released elements like
N, P, C can be recycled
10
Metal elements not further broken down, persist
in environment
Also As arsenic
11
Potential for Breakdown/Persistence Depends on
Chemical Composition
  • 1. Inorganic
  • 2. Organohalides
  • 3. Other organic compounds

12
Potential for Breakdown/Persistence Depends on
Chemical Composition
  • 1. Inorganic
  • Pre-World War II
  • often have persistent metals, e.g., CuSO4, Hg, Pb
    and As compounds.
  • metal ions don't break down in environment

13
Potential for Breakdown/Persistence Depends on
Chemical Composition
  • 2. Organohalides
  • contain Cl, Br
  • most used from World War II -1970s
  • large molecule breaks down (but often very
    slowly) and Cl, Br don't break down further in
    environment.

14
Potential for Breakdown/Persistence Depends on
Chemical Composition
  • 3. Other organic compounds (organophosphates,
    carbamates, insect growth regulators, etc.)
  • mostly newer materials
  • break down into common elements (e.g., C, N, O,
    S, P) that are nontoxic and recycled in
    environment.

15
Environmental Effects Depend on Chemistry
When compounds break down, released elements like
N, P, C can be recycled
16
Pesticides in Soil and Groundwater
  • 1. General pathway for degradation
  • Organic compounds
  • ?
  • Hydrolysis
  • ?
  • Some intermediate products still
  • toxic and provide control
  • ?
  • Degradation by soil microflora
  • ?
  • Movement through soil
  • (into water table)

17
Pesticides in Soil and Groundwater
  • 1. General pathway for degradation
  • Organic compounds
  • ?
  • Hydrolysis
  • ?
  • Some intermediate products still
  • toxic and provide control
  • ?
  • Degradation by soil microflora
  • ?
  • Movement through soil
  • (into water table)

Depends on how long material remains in soil vs
moves through water
18
Pesticides in Soil and Groundwater
  • 2. Rate of movement through soil into
    groundwater depends on
  • a) Solubility
  • b) Half life (persistence of material)
  • c) Soil depth (shallow vs. deep groundwater)
  • d) Soil type and other soil properties
  • Rao et al. (1985) - Table ranking solubilities
    and half lives of some common pesticides.

19
Solubilities (S) and Half-lives of Pesticides
20
Solubilities and Half Lives of Pesticides
High Solubility !
Rao et al., 1985
21
Solubilities and Half Lives of Pesticides
Half Life
S
High solubility means high chance for groundwater
contamination
Rao et al., 1985
22
Solubilities and Half Lives of Pesticides
Long Half Lives !
Rao et al., 1985
23
Solubilities and Half Lives of Pesticides
Half Life
S
Long half lives typical of organohalides
Rao et al., 1985
24
Biodegradation
  • Breakdown of pesticides by soil microflora
  • A normal process in soil
  • Recycles pesticide residues to harmless and
    useful elements like N, P, S, etc.

25
Accelerated or Enhanced Biodegradation
  • Breakdown of pesticides by soil microflora
    proceeds too quickly.
  • Noted in mid-1970s in corn growing area of US
  • Standard management for corn rootworms at that
    time was carbofuran placed in soil at planting.
  • In mid-1970s efficacy in protecting roots from
    damage was reduced.
  • Insects were still susceptible to carbofuran.

26
Accelerated or Enhanced Biodegradation
  • Breakdown of pesticides by soil microflora
    proceeds too quickly.
  • Noted in mid-1970s in corn growing area.
  • Standard management for corn rootworms at that
    time was carbofuran placed in soil at planting.
  • In mid-1970s efficacy in protecting roots from
    damage was reduced.
  • Insects were still susceptible to carbofuran.
  • Soil levels of carbofuran in certain areas were
    very low.
  • Several bacteria in these areas were found to use
    carbofuran as a food source ( accelerated or
    enhanced biodegradation).

27
Accelerated Biodegradation
  • Can affect efficacy of soil pesticides in some
    cases
  • heavy, frequent use selects for microflora
    capable of breaking down specific chemical
    products.
  • breakdown may be so rapid that product is
    ineffective, especially if targets are soilborne
    pests, like soil insects or nematodes.
  • note difference from pesticide resistance.
  • examples (1970s-1980s) - decline in efficacy of
    soil insecticides in U.S. corn belt (Felsot,
    1989).

28
Accelerated Biodegradation
  • 3. Remedies for accelerated biodegradation
    (Felsot, 1989)
  • a) Adhere to IPM ? use only when needed.
  • b) Proper calibration avoid overdose.
  • c) Rotate chemicals and classes of chemicals
    used.
  • d) Use alternative (non-chemical) methods when
    possible and effective.

Some have tried antibiotics !
29
Bioaccumulation
  • Cumulative buildup of toxic elements or
    compounds in the body of an organism.
  • Organohalides very soluble in fat tissues of
    organisms, good candidates for bioaccumulation.

30
Biomagnification Increase in concentration of
toxic products in higher consumers in food chains
31
Biomagnification
  • Most often seen as a problem in raptors and in
    higher aquatic predators.
  • A particular problem with persistent elements
    like Cl, Br, metals, and persistent compounds
    like organohalides.
  • Can be a problem in aquatic systems, far removed
    from agricultural sites.
  • Results from bioaccumulation but note difference
    from bioaccumulation.

32
With Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification, some
toxic effects reach beyond agricultural system
33
Heavy Metals
  • Persistent, can remain in site years after
    pesticide with metal was used
  • Pesticides with metals not used much anymore
  • Main source of metals in ag today is some
    amendments, especially municipal solid wastes,
    sludges, etc.
  • Even if metal amount in amendment application is
    low, total amount accumulates on site over time

34
References
  • Text pp. 216-219 (intro to pesticides), pp.
    256-262 (pesticides in environment)
  • Carroll et al. 1990. Ch.
  • Felsot, 1989. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 34453-476.
  • Rao et al. 1985. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc.
    441-8.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com