Title: Sustainable Farming: Role of Bio-energy Production
1Sustainable Farming Role of Bio-energy Production
CECS Seminar 5th October 2007
2Talk Outline
- Sustainable Development Agenda
- Final Energy
- Economics, Energy and GHG Balances
- Dedicated Energy Crops
- Economic and Environmental Implications
- Conventional Crops Used for Energy
- Economic and Environmental Implications
- Further Issues
3UK Sustainable Development Agenda
- "to enable all people throughout the world to
satisfy their basic needs and enjoy a better
quality of life without compromising the quality
of life of future generations"
4UK Principles of Sustainable Development
5Forward Strategy For Scottish Agriculture
- 'We want a prosperous and sustainable farming
industry, one of Scotland's success stories,
which benefits all the people of Scotland. It
should be - focused on producing food and other products for
the market - a major driver in sustaining rural development,
helping rural communities prosper - a leading player in the protection and
enhancement of the environment - a major contributor to key objectives on animal
health and welfare and human health and
well-being - keen to embrace change and market opportunities.
6Why Interest in Energy Crops at Farm Level?
- Farm Incomes
- Period of low returns from traditional
enterprises - Period of low returns from traditional markets
for commodities - Common Agricultural Policy Reform
- Support for Energy Crops arising from wider
concerns about Global Warming and energy security - Push for sustainable farming
7Some Key Questions
- What do we mean by bio-energy production
- Does it make economic sense?
- Are there environmental benefits?
- Will farmers adopt energy crops
8- Will concentrate on crops for bio-energy
production both conventional and non-conventional - Other forms of bioenergy anaerobic digestion e
- Other non-food use of crops raises many similar
issues
9Energy Crops and Conversion Technology
10Economics of Final Energy
11Heat and Electricity
Source SAC/University of Cambridge (2005)
12Biofuels
Source SAC/University of Cambridge
Source SAC/University of Cambridge (2005)
13Carbon and Energy Balances
14Energy Requirements
Source SAC/University of Cambridge
Source SAC/University of Cambridge (2005)
15GHG Emissions
Source SAC/University of Cambridge
Source SAC/University of Cambridge (2005)
16- Economics of production of final energy is
marginal at best (without support) - Energy and Carbon Savings could suggest
environmental benefits associated with production
of renewable fuels - At what cost?
17Cost of Carbon Abated Best Case Scenarios
Caution our estimates only Others may vary
considerably
Source SAC/University of Cambridge
Source SAC/University of Cambridge (2005)
18Support Measures
- Government Support
- Energy Crop Payment (45 Euro hectare)
- Planting Grants (1000/900)
- Capital Grants
- Producer Group Grants
- Renewable Obligation Certificates (ROCs)
- Tax Relief - Biofuels
- Road Traffic Fuel Obligation
19Dedicated Energy Crops
- Can they contribute to sustainable farming
systems? - Economics
- Environment
- Social
20Dedicated Energy Crops
- A number of policies in place that may be seen to
support production of energy crops either
directly or indirectly - However, only a very small area down to energy
crops at present - Why? Simple economic issue?
21Dedicated Energy Crops
22Assumptions for SRC/Miscanthus
- 16 year timeframe for the crop
- Yields 14 and 9 Odt/ha yr for Miscanthus and SRC
respectively - Price 25/Odt and 35/Odt ex-farm Miscanthus and
SRC respectively - Discount Rate 6 per cent
- Government Subsidies included (Planting Grant and
Energy Crop Payment i.e. assumed grown on non-set
aside land) - Contract harvested
- Includes rental value of land and minimum
overhead costs ( 87 per hectare)
23Returns and Costs of Production
Price in region of 25 to 35 per oven dried
tonne for commodity
24Sensitivity
- Our results are clearly sensitive to assumptions
in Key Areas - Yield
- Price
- Support
- Costs (esp. Land)
- Discount Rate
- Note Contracts are been offered on other terms
eg Lockerbie plant in Scotland
25Miscanthus Net Margin
Government support significantly influences
economics of production
26SRC Net Margin
27- Under the standard assumptions used for our study
the crops do not appear to generate positive NPV
when fully costed.
28Economics could change
- New Crop therefore technology could improve
- Add value same issue as in food chain sell
energy not wood chips - Alternative sources of income willow good way
of dealing with sewage sludge - If carbon has value then changes the economics
- Increased support
29Understanding Producer Behaviour
- Closer to agro-forestry than farming?
- 16 20 year timeframe
- Fixed contracts Isnt certainty good?
- Fewer alternative markets ABARE
30Environmental Benefits?
- In part depends upon incentives Production or
GHG savings? - Potential increase in diversity
- Issues with Landscape change
Now I am sure I saw some sheep on a hill somewhere
31Conventional Crops
32Existing Crops for Energy
- In some senses have advantages over dedicated
energy crops - Annual Crops
- Understand Technologies
- Alternative Markets
- Must remember competing for similar land
33Land Suitability Scotland SRC
- If produced map of suitability for combinable
crops would look very similar
Source W. Towers MLURI
34Two Years Ago Economics looked Marginal
Choice seemed between one uneconomic land use
and another
35However marked change in last year
36- In part fueled (!) by world biofuel demand but
mainly poor harvests in Australia, Europe leading
to record low world stocks
37US ethanol capacity expected to continue climbing
well ahead of target
Ethanol Ethanol Maize
Bn gall. Bn l Mt
06/07 5.6 21.5 56
07/08 8.3 32 86
08/09 11.8 45.6 120
UK doesnt actually have any dedicated bioethanol
plants at the moment. A number planned but high
prices will cause issues some have already been
mothballed in Europe
Source RFS/USDA/SAC
38Sustainable?
- Could argue that by increasing demand for
cereals/oilseeds it is improving economic element
of sustainability of farms. - However
- Not certain high prices will persist
- Detrimental to livestock farmers
- High prices may lead to conflicts between
economic/environmental aspects of farming - Intensive, Extensive, Set-Aside
39Intensity
- Fertiliser use doesnt appear very sensitive to
price
- However, increased fungicide applications could
be more viable
Source Simon Oxley SAC
40Extensive Margin
- Around 50,000 hectares in Scotland out of arable
since 2001 - In addition set-aside removal
10 to 5
5 to 10
41Sustainable
- In terms of overall sustainability methods of
production can have marked impact on energy and
GHG emissions. - Zero till versus ploughing for example
- Also potential to encourage unsustainable methods
of production - Shortened rotations
42Some Wider Issues
- Higher agricultural prices
- Benefit developing countries that are exporters
- May make it easier to push through further
agricultural policy reform in developed countries
potential longer term benefits - Food vs Fuel Debate
- Potentially increase risk to global food supply
and hence global food security - Food Poverty still an issue in West?
- Particularly impact on food importers
43Conclusions Does it help Sustainable Farming
Agenda
- Bioenergy production does offer potential
environmental gains in terms of energy use and
GHG emissions which might justify support - BUT - Does depend upon method of production
- Economics currently in favour of wheat/oilseeds
with fewer gains? (but might change with second
generation)
44Conclusions
- Current high prices do improve economic viability
for some producers - Major issues when begin to
distort crops vs livestock, maize vs soya, food
vs fuel - At the national level does present challenges for
wider policy aims for sustainable agriculture
biodiversity, water quality, agri-environmental
schemes, local food
45- Acknowledgement
- This presentation forms part of the on-going work
on Sustainable Farming Systems funded by the
Scottish Government Rural and Environment
Research and Analysis Directorate (RERAD)
46(No Transcript)