Economics for CED - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Economics for CED

Description:

Everyday Life in the. Warsaw Ghetto. Warsaw, Poland - 1941. Scott Masters. Crestwood College adapted from the Yad Vashem Archives ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: noemigi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics for CED


1
Economics for CED
  • Noémi GiszpencSpring 2004Lecture 9 Macro
    International Trade
  • June 2, 2004

2
Why trade among nations?
  • Why not practice self-sufficiency?
  • Mercantilists (17th 18th C.) if you can export
    more than you import, that
  • creates jobs in your country and
  • Gives you gold reserves to pay mercenaries
  • Free-traders (late 18th 19th C.)
  • Because trade is mutually beneficial
  • Creates larger markets, which means more division
    of labor--more specialization--therefore more
    production, and higher real incomes.
  • David Ricardo theory of comparative advantage

3
Comparative advantage
David Ricardo(1772-1823)
  • Best understood using a numerical example
  • 2 countries England and Portugal
  • 2 goods wine and cloth
  • Portugal takes fewer man-hours to produce both
  • Opportunity cost of cloth in Portugal is 3
    barrels wine
  • Opportunity cost of cloth in England is 2 barrels
    wine

4
England and Portugal trade
  • England exports cloth to Portugal
  • At Portuguese prices, each roll of cloth buys 3
    barrels of wine
  • In England a roll of cloth is worth only 2
    barrels
  • Portugal exports wine to England
  • At English prices, a barrel of wine buys half a
    roll of cloth
  • In Portugal a barrel is worth only 1/3 roll of
    cloth
  • Thus, Portuguese get cloth cheaper by producing
    wine to trade for cloth than by producing cloth
    at home
  • despite the fact that they can produce more cloth
    per unit of labor than the English can.

5
Trade with comparative advantage
  • Prices will probably be somewhere between two
    extremes say, 2.5 rolls of cloth per barrel of
    wine
  • At these prices, both countries still better off
    with trade than without
  • Key point England has a comparative advantage in
    cloth
  • Even though Portugal has the absolute advantage
    in both goods.
  • Relative price of cloth (in wine) is less in
    England.

6
Realistic qualifications
  • David Ricardo believed in the Labor Theory of
    Value--that natural prices derived from amount
    of labor.
  • Prices depend on at least 3 factors of
    production land, labor, capital
  • Still, different countries have different
    resource endowments, so comparative advantage
    still holds.
  • As in other markets, prices determined largely by
    supply and demand.

7
Realistic qualifications (cont.)
  • Most trade is multi-lateral (among many countries
    with many goods) not bilateral (2 countries) with
    only 2 goods
  • Doesnt undermine idea of comparative advantage
    though
  • Some trade is in roughly similar products
  • counter-trade Jaguars for Toyotas
  • Different tastes in different countries can lead
    to mutually beneficial trades

8
Realistic qualifications (cont.)
  • Monopoly power
  • Could make both countries worse off.
  • Openness to trade could limit monopoly power.
  • Unemployment
  • Comparative advantage model assumes full
    employment
  • If mercantilist trade policies can promote more
    employment, policy makers face dilemma
  • Will the country be better off with trade
    according to comparative advantage, which is
    efficient?
  • or are more, inefficient jobs better than no jobs
    at all?

9
Realistic qualifications (cont.)
  • Static or dynamic?
  • In model, poorer country is better off from
    trade, but remains relatively poor
  • This is because improving productivity is outside
    of the model

10
What Herman Daly says
  • One of the unmentioned assumptions of the model
    is that both labor and capital are moored to
    their respective nations.
  • Under such conditions, comparative advantage
    takes over.
  • But with mobile capital, only absolute advantage
    matters.
  • Capital picks up and moves to more productive
    locale--in the examples case, Portugal.

11
How does money flow?
  • Often needs to change from one monetary unit to
    another
  • Like other exchanges, the relative prices of
    national moneys are determined by supply and
    demand
  • People in one country demand units of foreign
    countries to buy foreign goods
  • (and to make gobs of money speculating)
  • So demand for currency is related to demand for
    real goods and services.
  • (and to different interest rates paid)

12
2 ways of determining FX rates
  • Purchasing Power Parity
  • Assumption if goods cost different amounts in
    different countries, arbitrage will whittle down
    the differences
  • Interest Rate Parity
  • Assumption if different currencies earn
    different rates of return, exchange rates will
    adjust to reflect differential demands

13
Purchasing Power Parity
  • Say basket of goods in country A costs pAy
  • Same basket of goods in country B costs pBy
  • So pAy/pBy pA/pB should EA/B
  • Say pA goes up EA/B goes up, meaning more A for
    every B a devaluation of A relative to B.
  • What causes changes in pA?
  • Inflation
  • Changes in productivity
  • Changes in E from other causes

14
Problems with PPP theory
  • Transportation costs and trade restrictions
  • Costs of Non-Tradable Inputs
  • Such as rent
  • Perfect information
  • Needed for effective arbitrage
  • Other market participants
  • PPP is about goods. Total world trade is approx.
    100 billion/day. Activity on the FX market is
    approx. 1 trillion/day. What else is going on?

15
Interest Rate Parity
  • Say interest rate in country A is iA.
  • After one years investment, A1 ? A(1iA)
  • Where A is the symbol of As currency B is Bs
    currency.
  • Say interest rate in country B is iB, and the
    exchange rate is EA/B.
  • If you converted A1 ? B(1/EA/B), after one years
    investment youd get B(1/EA/B (1 iB)).
  • If the exchange rate in one year is EA/B, then
    you could get back AEA/B(1/EA/B (1 iB))
  • Which, if the rates of return are equal for both
    investments, ought to be equal to A(1iA).

16
Rearranging
  • You obtain
  • Where iA is rate of return on investment in
    country A RHS is return on investment in B.
  • Shows that the expected rate of return on the
    asset from country B depends on two things
  • interest rate in country B, and
  • the expected percentage change in the value of B
  • If B appreciates, rate of return is higher--so
    investors would be willing to accept a lower
    interest rate.

17
How are FX rates determined?
  • Supply and Demand for B
  • If B appreciates (EA/B rises), holders of B more
    willing to sell holders of A less willing to buy
    B.
  • Say FX market is in equilibrium. Now say iA goes
    up. What happens?

18
Effect of interest rates on FX
  • If iA goes up, rate of return on holding A goes
    up.
  • Sellers more willing to sell B for A.
  • Buyers less willing to buy B--prefer to hold on
    to A.
  • EA/B falls to new equilibrium
  • A appreciates relative to B
  • Rate of return now equal.

19
Effect of expectations on FX
  • Say investors raise their expected future
    exchange rate, E.
  • This will raise the rate of return on holding B.
  • Sellers will want to sell less B
  • Buyers will want to buy more B.
  • Equilibrium exchange rate rises.
  • A case of self-fulfilling expectations.

EA/B
SB
DB
QB
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com