Defining independence: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Defining independence:

Description:

Independence/Partisanship: the extent to which the decision-maker ... E.g., the Menem court in Argentina, the Constitutional Court in Kyrgyzstan under Akayev ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: initi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defining independence:


1
Defining independence
  • Two dimensions of independence, and their sources

2
Control vs. Independence
  • Autonomy/Control the degree of uncertainty we
    will tolerate in judicial decisions the amount
    of discretion left to individual judges
  • Independence/Partisanship the extent to which
    the decision-maker is identified with one of the
    parties to the dispute.

3
Control over preferences vs. control over
decision-making
  • lack of preference independence the
    over-identification of judges with a party that
    has an interest in the dispute (often, the
    executive)
  • E.g., the Menem court in Argentina, the
    Constitutional Court in Kyrgyzstan under Akayev
  • lack of decisional independence the capacity of
    an interested party (often, the executive) to
    interfere with judicial decision-making
  • E.g., telephone justice in Bahia and across the
    region

4
The source of control institutional design
  • Mechanisms of appointment produce different
    levels of control over the preferences of
    appointees
  • Compare simple majority of Senate, to simple
    majority with filibuster rule, to 2/3 majority
  • Mechanisms that control decision-making
    (discipline, promotion, compensation, appellate
    oversight) produce different levels of control
    over decision-making
  • Compare impeachment, to discipline and promotion
    by an oversight body
  • Variation in degrees depends on capacity access
    to information, available sanctions, ease of use

5
The source of partisanship politics
  • Factional dominance of mechanisms of appointment
    and control
  • Open and public mechanisms force the use of more
    consensual standards, so reduce any one factions
    capacity to bias outcomes
  • Internal mechanisms typically have more
    information than external mechanisms and are more
    effective, but harder for outside factions to
    control
  • When these mechanisms are controlled by an
    identifiable faction, the courts lose (at least
    the perception) of independence.
  • Political Partisanship
  • Other kinds of factions e.g. economic elites
    (SĂ£o Paulo, Brz) conservative social elites
    (CĂ³rdoba, Arg)

6
  • In short
  • Politics interacts with institutional design to
    produce varying levels of independence and
    control.

7
Independence vs. Uncertainty
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com