Know The Truth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

Know The Truth

Description:

... to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the ... one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: knowthet
Category:
Tags: april | day | fools | history | know | of | truth

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Know The Truth


1
Know The Truth
Philosophy
Geology
Biology
  • Exploring the claims of evolution against the
    astonishing revelations of empirical science
  • - Gods creation revealed!

Physics
Paleontology
Creation
Astronomy
Psychology
Anthropology
2
OUTLINE
  • Reviewing Foundations
  • Know Your Definitions
  • Evolutionary Foundations
  • Examine The Evidence
  • Intelligent Design
  • Questions Answers
  • Resources Books, Web, Contact Info

3
AGENDA
  • Age of the Earth
  • CARBON DATING
  • RADIO-ISOTOPE DATING
  • GEOLOGY
  • EARTH CHRONOLOGY MEASURES
  • Dinosaurs
  • Genesis Flood Noahs Ark
  • What To Do With This Information

4
REVIEWING FOUNDATIONS
  • CREATIONIST FOUNDATIONS
  • EVOLUTIONIST FOUNDATIONS
  • NEW KID INTELLIGENT DESIGN

5
CREATIONISTFOUNDATIONS
6
FOUNDATION OF CREATIONISM
  • Genesis 1 1
  • In the beginning God created the heavens and the
    earth.

7
FOUNDATION OF CREATIONISM
  • Romans 118-25
  • The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven
    against all the godlessness and wickedness of men
    who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since
    what may be known about God is plain to them,
    because God has made it plain to them. For since
    the creation of the world God's invisible
    qualitieshis eternal power and divine
    naturehave been clearly seen, being understood
    from what has been made, so that men are without
    excuse.   For although they knew God, they
    neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to
    him, but their thinking became futile and their
    foolish hearts were darkened. Although they
    claimed to be wise, they became fools and
    exchanged the glory of the immortal God for
    images made to look like mortal man and birds and
    animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them
    over in the sinful desires of their hearts to
    sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies
    with one another. They exchanged the truth of God
    for a lie, and worshiped and served created
    things rather than the Creatorwho is forever
    praised. Amen

8
FOUNDATION OF CREATIONISM
  • 1 Peter 315
  • be ready to give an answer to everyone asking
    you a reason concerning the hope in you, with
    meekness and fear
  • Psalm 1345
  • I praise you because I am fearfully and
    wonderfully made your works are wonderful, I
    know that full well

9
REASON VS BLIND FAITH
  • Know your reasons for faith...

They are based on an empty tomb!
10
The Bible and the History of Life
  • And God made the beast of the earth after his
    kind, and cattle after their kind, and every
    thing that creepeth upon the earth after his
    kind and God saw that it was good.
  • Genesis 125

11
The Bible and the History of Life
  • 11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass,
    the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree
    yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in
    itself, upon the earth and it was so. 12 And the
    earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed
    after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit,
    whose seed was in itself, after his kind and God
    saw that it was good.
  • Genesis 111-12

12
EVOLUTIONIST FOUNDATIONS
13
Evolution History of the Life
  • All species evolved over billions of years
  • from a common ancestor

JB
14
EVOLUTIONARY FOUNDATIONS
  • MATERIALISM
  • CHANCE
  • FOSSIL RECORD
  • HOMOLOGY
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION

15
EVOLUTIONARY FOUNDATIONS
  • MATERIALISM There is no need for a supernatural
    explanation to biological origins and subsequent
    species development
  • CHANCE Evolution is based on an accumulation of
    slight mutations, occurring one at a time, all
    by pure chance

16
EVOLUTIONARY FOUNDATIONS
  • FOSSIL RECORD A history of changes in
    chronological order are evidence of evolutionary
    theory
  • HOMOLOGY Similar features across kinds of
    animals validate evolutionary theory
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION The number of species
    and their subsequent changes to respective
    environments belies an adaptive, change mechanism

17
EVOLUTIONARY FOUNDATIONS
  • SUMMARY
  • MATERIALISM There is no need for a supernatural
    explanation to biological origins and subsequent
    species development
  • CHANCE Evolution is based on an accumulation of
    slight mutations, occurring one at a time, all
    by pure chance
  • FOSSIL RECORD A history of changes in
    chronological order are evidence of evolutionary
    theory
  • HOMOLOGY Similar features across kinds of
    animals validate evolutionary theory
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION The number of species
    and their subsequent changes to respective
    environments belies an adaptive, change mechanism

18
REVIEW YOUR FOUNDATIONS
What you believe is important!
19
DEFINITION OF EVOLUTION
  • Special Evolution
  • Nothing
  • Single Cell
  • Multiple Cell
  • Jelly Fish
  • Fish
  • Amphibian
  • Reptile
  • Bird
  • Mammal

2.5BY
1 BY
50 MY
50 MY
10 MY
?
?
?
20
DEFINITION OF EVOLUTION
  • THE CLAIM Evolutionists use adaptation as
    evidence of Amoeba to Man evolution!
  • THE RESPONSE Ensure you are talking about the
    same definition of evolution!

21
(No Transcript)
22
EXAMINE THE EVIDEENCE
  • MATERIALISM
  • CHANCE
  • FOSSIL RECORD
  • HOMOLOGY
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION

23
EXAMINE THE EVIDEENCE
  • CHANCE

24
IMPOSSIBILITY OF CHANCE
  • Chance alone is at the source of every
    innovation, of all creation in the biosphere.
    Pure chance, absolutely free but blind, is at
    the root of the stupendous edifice of evolution
  • - Dr. Jacques Monod, biologist.

BLIND FAITH!
25
IMPOSSIBILITY OF CHANCE
  • Consider this
  • Chance requires 10 billion tries on the average
    to count to 10 using numbered coins

5 2 3 10 4 6 7 9 8 1 2 1 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 9 7 2 3
4 6 9 10 1 8 5 6 7 1 2 5 8 9 10 3 4 9 2 7 4 1
6 3 8 5 10 6 7 1 2 5 8 9 10 3 4 4 5 3 1 2 6 8 7 9
10 7 9 3 4 1 6 5 8 2 10 6 2 3 4 5 1 9 8 7 10 5 9
10 8 1 6 7 4 2 3 5 9 3 4 1 6 7 8 2 10 3 5 9 6 4 1
10 7 8 2
  • intelligence requires seconds
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

26
IMPOSSIBILITY OF CHANCE
  • Even short unique sequences just ten amino acids
    long only occur once by chance in about 1013
    average-sized proteins unique sequences about
    twenty amino acids long once in about 1026
    proteins and unique sequences thirty amino acids
    long once in about 1039 proteins!
  • Evolution, A Theory In Crisis, Michael Denton, p
    323

5 2 3 10 4 6 7 9 8 1 2 1 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 9 7 2 3
4 6 9 10 1 8 5 6 7 1 2 5 8 9 10 3 4 9 2 7 4 1
6 3 8 5 10 6 7 1 2 5 8 9 10 3 4 4 5 3 1 2 6 8 7 9
10 7 9 3 4 1 6 5 8 2 10 6 2 3 4 5 1 9 8 7 10 5 9
10 8 1 6 7 4 2 3 5 9 3 4 1 6 7 8 2 10 3 5 9 6 4 1
10 7 8 2
There are only 1049 possible proteins anything
above 30 amino acids would not even be possible!
27
IMPOSSIBILITY OF CHANCE
  • YOUR FIRST TOOL COUNT TO 10
  • Your simplest intelligent action displays your
    own proof that creation is an action of
    intelligence, not blind faith/chance

28
IMPOSSIBILITY OF CHANCE
  • Consider thisEven the tiniest of bacterial cells
    require thousands of pieces of intricate
    molecular machines made up of millions of atoms

far more complicated than any man-made machine
ever made with intelligence!
29
BLIND CHANCE
  • YOUR THIRD TOOL SHREK
  • Remember the 3 blind mice of Shrek?
  • Lets play the game of evolution

You cannot apply any directed intelligence to
the evolutionary process none it is blind!
30
FOSSIL RECORD
31
Interpretation of Scientific Data
I believe in evolution
Scientific Data
Beliefs influence Interpretation
Evolution is Seen
Beliefs influence interpretation
32
Interpretation of Scientific Data
Does the data match evolution or the Bible?
Scientific Data
What was the science behind the data?!
Challenge your beliefs
33
The Fossil Record and Education
  • WHAT IS BEING TAUGHT?

MR
34
The Fossil Record and Education
Biology Principles and Explorations, Holt,
Rinehart, Winston, 2001, p. 283.
  • Fossils offer the most direct evidence that
    evolution takes place.
  • Fossils, therefore, provide an actual record of
    Earths past life-forms. Change over time
    (evolution) can be seen in the fossil record.

Does The Evidence Show This?
MR
35
FOSSIL RECORD
  • If evolution is true, what would we expect to
    find in the fossil record? NO GAPS
  • If creation is true, what would we expect to find
    in the fossil record? GAPS

36
Fossil Record
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
The foundation
MR
37
EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE
Actual Data
T I M E
Tree of life
Sudden appearance of complex creatures Created
after their kind
Darwinian Model
Morphology
38
FOSSIL RECORD
most species, including most horses, appear
abruptly in the fossil record, change very little
over their entire history and then disappear just
as unceremoniously. This pattern is well known to
paleontologists who have actually attributed it
to the imperfection of the fossil record the
missing links between one species and another
have all died without the decency to leave their
remains as fossils.
Johnjoe McFadden (Professor of Molecular Biology
and Quantum Physics), Quantum Evolution, 2000, p.
71.
39
CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
Biology, Miller and Levine, 2002, p. 746.
  • The Cambrian Period, which began 544 million
    years ago, is marked by an abundance of different
    fossils. Why the difference from earlier periods?
  • By the Cambrian period, some animals had evolved
    shells, skeletons, and other hard body parts

Difference Zero to BOOM! Evidence?
40
CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
David Berlinski (evolutionist), A Tour of the
Calculus, 1995
  • There is no question that such gaps exist. A big
    gap appears at the beginning of the Cambrian
    explosion, over 500 million years ago, when great
    numbers of new species suddenly appeared in the
    fossil record.

MR
41
CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
Ariel Roth (Ph.D. Zoology), Origins,1998, p. 184.
  • The Cambrian explosion is not just a case of all
    the major animal phyla appearing at about the
    same place in the geologic column. It is also a
    situation of no ancestors to suggest how they
    might have evolved.

Where are the thousands of observable
intermediates?
MR
42
Invertebrate to Vertebrate (Fish)
Biology, Miller and Levine, 2000, p. 680.
  • Fishes are considered to be the most primitive
    living vertebrates
  • similarities in structure and embryological
    development show that fishes and modern
    invertebrate chordates probably did evolve from
    common invertebrate ancestors that lived many
    millions of years ago.

There is not one single intermediate in the
textbook to support this claim!
MR
43
Invertebrate to Vertebrate (Fish)
Where are the thousands of observable
intermediates?
MR
44
Aerial Roth (Ph.D. Zoology), Origins, p.
189.
  • However, we have virtually no evidence in the
    fossil record or elsewhere for any of the changes
    proposed during this immensity of time but the
    public hears nothing of this problem.

MR
45
FISH TO AMPHIBIAN
Biology Visualizing Life, Holt, Rinehart, and
Winston, 1998, p. 461.
  • Because of these similarities, scientists think
    the first amphibians were descendants of the
    lobe-finned fishes, a group whose modern members
    include the coelacanth and the lungfishes.

This is supposedly evolving into legs
MR
46
COELACANTH
  • Extinct for 70 million years
  • 1938 living coelacanths were found
  • It is still 100 fish no mutations?!!

The front fins (lobes) are still fins
MR-modified
47
What do the Facts Support?
Created after their kind
Created after their kind
Created after their kind
Where are the thousands of observable
intermediates?
MR
48
Ernst Mayr, Professor Emeritus in the Museum of
Comparative Zoology at Harvard University
Ernst Mayr, Hailed as the Darwin of the 20th
century, What Evolution Is, 2001, p. 14.
  • Given the fact of evolution, one would expect
    the fossils to document a gradual steady change
    from ancestral forms to the descendants. But this
    is not what the paleontologists finds. Instead,
    he or she finds gaps in just about every phyletic
    series.

Blind faith!
MR-modified
49
Colin Patterson Senior paleontologist at the
British Museum of Natural History in London
(Colin Pattersons statement that he had left out
the evolutionary transitions in his book, if he
had known of any fossils, he certainly would have
included them, is stated in Personal
Communications by Colin Patterson to Luther
Sunderland, Appalachian, New York, April 10,
1979.)
  • "I fully agree with your comments on the lack of
    direct illustration of evolutionary transitions
    in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I
    would certainly have included them. So, much as I
    should like to oblige you by jumping to the
    defense of gradualism, and fleshing out the
    transitions between the major types of animals
    and plants, I find myself a bit short of the
    intellectual justification necessary for the
    job." 

He has over 7 million fossils!
50
Dr Stephen J Gould Professor of Geology and
Zoology at Harvard University
(Gould developed punctuated equilibria)
  • All paleontologists know that the fossil record
    contains precious little in the way of
    intermediate forms transitions in organic
    design, indeed our inability, even in our
    imaginations, to construct functional
    intermediates in many cases, has been a
    persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic
    accounts of evolution. The extreme rarity of
    transitional forms in the fossil record persists
    as the trade secret of palaeontology. The
    evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have
    data only at the tips and nodes of their
    branches the rest is inference however
    reasonable, not the evidence of the fossils.

Leading evolutionist!
51
Dr. Niles Eldridge Curator, Division of
Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History,
Ph.D. (Geology)
Niles Eldredge has been a paleontologist on the
curatorial staff of the American Museum of
Natural History since 1969. His specialty is the
evolution of trilobites. Developed punctuated
equilibria with Gould.
  • " Micromutations do occur, but the theory that
    these alone can account for evolutionary change
    is either falsified or else it is an
    unfalsifiable, hence metaphysical theory. I
    suppose that no one will deny that it is a great
    misfortune if an entire branch of science becomes
    addicted to a false theory. But this is what
    happens in biology... I believe that one day the
    Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit
    in the history of science. When this happens many
    people will pose the question "How did this ever
    happen?"." 

Leading evolutionist!
52
Dr. Niles Eldridge Curator, Division of
Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History,
Ph.D. (Geology)
  • " At the core of punctuated equilibria lies an
    empirical observation once evolved, species tend
    to remain remarkably stable, recognizable
    entities for millions of years. The observation
    is by no means new, nearly every paleontologist
    who reviewed Darwin's Origin of Species pointed
    to his evasion of this salient feature of the
    fossil record. But stasis was conveniently
    dropped as a feature of life's history to he
    reckoned with in evolutionary biology. And stasis
    had continued to be ignored until Gould and I
    showed that such stability is a real aspect of
    life's history which must be confronted-and that,
    in fact, it posed no fundamental threat to the
    basic notion of evolution itself. For that was
    Darwin's problem to establish the plausibility
    of the very idea of evolution, Darwin felt that
    he had to undermine the older (and ultimately
    biblically based) doctrine of species fixity.
    Stasis, to Darwin, was an ugly inconvenience.
  • Time Frames The Rethinking of Darwinian
    Evolution and the Theory of Punctuated
    Equilibria, Simon Schuster New York NY, 1985,
    pp.188-189

53
Steven Stanley, Macroevolution, 1979 p. 2
After examining the fossil record
we might wonder whether the doctrine of
evolution would qualify as anything more than an
outrageous hypothesis.
54
Dr George Wald (Professor Emeritus of Biology at
Harvard, Nobel Prize winner in Biology 1971.
  • The explanation value of the evolutionary
    hypothesis of common origin is nil! Evolution not
    only conveys no knowledge, it seems to convey
    anti-knowledge. How could I work on evolution ten
    years and learn nothing from it? Most of you in
    this room will have to admit that in the last ten
    years we have seen the basis of evolution go from
    fact to faith! It does seem that the level of
    knowledge about evolution is remarkably shallow.
    We know it ought not be taught in high school,
    and that's all we know about it.

55
Remember this quote?
Biology Principles and Explorations, Holt,
Rinehart, Winston, 2001, p. 283.
  • Fossils offer the most direct evidence that
    evolution takes place.
  • Fossils, therefore, provide an actual record of
    Earths past life-forms. Change over time
    (evolution) can be seen in the fossil record.

Why is it still being taught?
MR
56
EXAMINING THE EVIDENCE
  • CHANCE - impossible
  • FOSSIL RECORD evidence does not support
    Darwins special evolution
  • HOMOLOGY
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION
  • MATERALISM

57
  • H O M O L O G Y

58
DARWINS ARGUMENT
  • HOMOLOGY LOOKS ALIKE
  • The bones in vertebrate limbs, whether bat,
    porpoise, horse or human, follow a similar
    pattern must be a common ancestor

59
Haekel's Embryos
Early drawings were faked.
60
Haekel's Embryos
Humans never have gills as embryos! Embryonic
Stages for different animals are not similar!
61
Homology - Problem
  • Common Ancestor?
  • Legs Arms come from same place in embryo in all
    animals? No! So they all evolved from a
    different place? Why? If it was advantageous to
    the common ancestor originally, why the need for
    change at every level? What made it advantageous
    for the given environment at the moment?

62
Homology - Problem
  • Common Ancestor?
  • Legs Arms come from same gene in embryo in all
    animals? No!
  • So they all evolved from different genes?
    Why? If it was advantageous to the common
    ancestor originally, why the need for change at
    every level?

63
Homology - Problem
  • Different evolution for arms and legs for all
    animals?
  • Problem So if arms and legs evolved in the
    embryo from different genes in different
    sections, why do they use the same pentadactyl
    structure!
  • Evidence of Designed Structure
  • A builder with a common plan!

64
Homology
  • Sir Alister Hardy, The Living Stream, Collins,
    London, p 213, 1965
  • The concept of homology is absolutely
    fundamental to what we are talking about when we
    speak of evolution yet in truth we cannot
    explain it all in terms of present day biological
    theory

65
  • ADAPTATION

66
Adaptation
  • Loss of information is not a credible evidence of
    special evolution! Evolution requires the gain
    of information, not the loss!

67
God, the Creator, Designer
  • LIKE MATERIALS
  • ATOMS
  • DNA
  • CILIA
  • HEMOGLOBIN
  • Have an ear to hear not at the embryonic level!

68
EXAMINING THE EVIDENCE
  • CHANCE - impossible
  • FOSSIL RECORD evidence does not support
    Darwins special evolution
  • HOMOLOGY - Looking alike at a macro level is
    shown to not be alike at the micro-level.
  • ADAPTATION SPECIATION - Loss of information is
    not a credible evidence of special evolution!
    Evolution requires the gain of information, not
    the loss!
  • MATERALISM Requires Energy Matter No
    Intelligence in Direction or Design

69
  • Questions?

70
RESOURCES Know the Truth Ministry
  • Steve Stuart
  • E-mail stuarts_at_wavecable.com
  • Home 360.876.2686
  • Website http//home.wavecable.com/stuarts
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com