Distillation Column - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Distillation Column

Description:

Distillation Column From fig. 11.34 (Coulson & Richardson 6th volume 3rd edition) for plate thickness/hole diameter = 1.00 We get, Co = 0.84 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1943
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: engineerin99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Distillation Column


1
Distillation Column
2
Distillation
  • Process in which a liquid or vapour mixture of
    two or more substances is separated into its
    component fractions of desired purity, by the
    application and removal of heat

3
CHOICE BETWEEN PLATE AND PACKED COLUMN
  • The choice between use of tray column or a
    packed column for a given mass transfer operation
    should, theoretically, be based on a detail cost
    analysis for the two types of contactors.
    However, the decision can be made on the basis of
    a qualitative analysis of relative advantages and
    disadvantages, eliminating the need for a
    detailed cost comparison.
  • Which are as follows

4
  • Liquid dispersion difficulties
  • Capable of handling wide ranges liquid rates
  • Cleaning.
  • Non-foaming systems
  • Periodic cleaning
  • weight of the column
  • Design information
  • Inter stage cooling
  • Temperature change
  • Diameters

5
  • As my system is non foaming and diameter
    calculated is larger than 0.67 m so I am going to
    use Tray column.
  • Also as average temperature calculated for my
    distillation column is higher that is
    approximately equal to 98oc. So I prefer Tray
    column.

6
PLATE CONTACTORS
  • Cross flow plate are the most commonly used
    plate contactor in distillation. In which liquid
    flows downward and vapours flow upward. The
    liquid move from plate to plate via down comer. A
    certain level of liquid is maintained on the
    plates by weir.

7
  • Three basic types of cross flow trays used are
  • Sieve Plate (Perforated Plate)
  • Bubble Cap Plates
  • Valve plates (floating cap plates)

8
Selection of Trays
9
  • I prefer Sieve Plate because
  • Pressure drop is low as compared to bubble cap
    trays
  • Their fundamentals are well established,
    entailing low risk.
  • The trays are low in cost relative to many other
    types of trays.
  • They can easily handle wide variations in flow
    rates.
  • They are lighter in weight. It is easier and
    cheaper to install.
  • Maintenance cost is reduced due to the ease of
    cleaning.

10
Sieve Tray
11
Label Diagram (sieve tray)
Man Way
Downcomer And Weir
Calming Zone
Plate Support Ring
Major Beam
12
FACTORS AFFECTING DISTILLATION COLUMN OPERATION
  • Adverse vapour flow conditions can cause
  • Blowing
  • Coning
  • Dumping
  • Raining
  • Weeping
  • Flooding

13
Condenser Pump
Reboiler
FLOW SHEET
REFLUX DRUM
REFLUX DRUM
(1) Methyl Iodide 0.212 (2) Acetic Acid
0.0005 (3)Methyl Acetate 0.62 (4) Water 0.167
(1) Methyl Iodide 0.21 (2) Acetic Acid
0.0005 (3)Methyl Acetate 0.62 (4) Water 0.17

FEED
FEED

(1) Methyl Iodide 0.074 (2) Acetic Acid
0.65 (3)Methyl Acetate 0.215 (4) Water 0.065
(1) Methyl Iodide 0.07 (2) Acetic Acid
0.65 (3)MethylAcetate0.22 (4) Water 0.065

(1)Acetic Acid 0.99 (2)Water 0.01
14
  • From Material Balance

15
  • DESIGNING STEPS OF DISTILLATION COLUMN
  • Calculation of Minimum number of stages.Nmin
  • Calculation of Minimum Reflux Ratio Rm.
  • Calculation of Actual Reflux Ratio.
  • Calculation of theoretical number of stages.
  • Calculation of actual number of stages.
  • Calculation of diameter of the column.
  • Calculation of weeping point, entrainment.
  • Calculation of pressure drop.
  • Calculation of the height of the column.

16
  • Calculation of Minimum no. of Plates
  • The minimum no. of stages Nmin is
    obtained
  • from Fenske equation which is,
  • Nmin LN(xLK/xHK)D(xHK /xLK)B
  • LN (aLK/HK) average
  • Average geometric relative volatility
    1.53
  • So,
  • Nmin 24

17
Calculation of Minimum Reflux Ratio Rm
  • Using Underwood equations
  • As feed is entering as saturated vapors so,
  • q 0
  • By trial, ? 1.68
  • Using equation of minimum reflux ratio,
  • Putting all values we get,
  • Rm 4.154

18
Actual Reflux Ratio
  • The rule of thumb is
  • R (1.2 ------- 1.5) R min
  • R 1.5 R min
  • R 6.23

19
Theoretical no. of Plates
  • Gilliland related the number of equilibrium
    stages and the minimum reflux ratio and the no.
    of equilibrium stages with a plot that was
    transformed by Eduljee into the relation
  • From which the theoretical no. of stages to
    be,
  • N 39

20
Calculation of actual number of stages
  • Overall Tray Efficiency

a avg average relative volatility of light key
component 1.75 µ avg molar average liquid
viscosity of feed evaluated at average
temperature of column
21
  • Average temperature of column (11871)/2

  • 95 oC
  • Feed viscosity at average temperature ?avg

  • 0.39 mNs/m2
  • So,
  • Eo 56.60
  • So,
  • No. of actual trays 39/0.566 68

22
Location of feed Plate
  • The Kirk bride method is used to determine the
    ratio of trays above and below the feed point.
  • From which,
  • Number of Plates above the feed tray ND 47
  • Number of Plates below the feed tray NB 21

23
Determination of the Column Diameter
  • Flow Parameter
  • FLV Liquid Vapor Factor 0.056

24
Capacity Parameter
  • Assumed tray spacing 18 inch (0.5 m)
  • From Fig (15-5) Plant Design and Economics for
    Chemical Engineering, sieve tray flooding
    capacity,
  • Csb 0.0760 m/Sec
  • Surface tension of Mixture s 18.35 dynes/Cm
  • Vnf1.67 m/sec
  • Assume 90 of flooding then
  • Vn0.9Vnf
  • So, actual vapor velocity,
  • Vn1.51 m/sec

25
  • Net column area used in separation is
  • An mv/Vn
  • Volumetric flow rate of vapors mv
  • mv (mass vapor flow rate /(3600)
  • vapor density)
  • mv 2.1184m3/sec
  • Now, net area An mv/Vn 1.41m2
  • Assume that downcommer occupies 15 of cross
    sectional Area (Ac) of column thus
  • Ac An Ad
  • Where, Ad downcommer area

26
  • Ac An 0.15(Ac)
  • Ac An / 0.85
  • Ac1.65 m2
  • So Diameter of Column Is
  • Ac (p/4)D2
  • D (4Ac/p)
  • D 1.45 meter 5ft
  • (based upon bottom conditions)

27
Liquid flow arrangement
  • In order to find liquid flow arrangement first
    find maximum liquid volumetric flow rate
  • So liquid flow rate
  • (Liquid mass rate)/ (3600) (Liquid density)
  • Max Liquid Rate Is At the bottom of column so
    using "Lm" values
  • So Maximum liquid flow rate 0.005 m3/sec
  • So from fig11.28 Coulson Richardson 6th volume
    3rd edition cross flow single pass plate is
    selected

28
Provisional Plate Design
  • Column Diameter Dc 1.4513 m
  • Column Cross-sectional Area(Ac) 1.65 m2
  • Down comer area Ad 0.15Ac 0.25 m2
  • Net Area (An) Ac - Ad 1.41 m2
  • Active area AaAc-2Ad 1.16 m2
  • Hole area Ah take 10 Aa 0.1 1.16
  • 0.0462 m2
  • Weir length
  • Ad / Ac 0.248 / 1.654 0.15

29
  • From figure 11.31 Coulson Richardson 6th volume
    3rd edition
  • Lw / dc 0.80
  • Lw 1.4520.80
  • 0.733 m
  • Weir length should be 60 to 85 of column
    diameter which is satisfactory
  • Take weir height, hw 50 mm
  • Hole diameter, dh 5 mm
  • Plate thickness 5 mm

30
Check Weeping
  • where Umin is the minimum design vapor
    velocity.
  • The vapor velocity at weeping point is the
    minimum velocity for the stable operation.
  • In order to have K2 value from fig11.30
    Coulson Richardson 6th volume 3rd edition we
    have to 1st find how(depth of the crest of liquid
    over the weir)
  • where how is calculated by following formula

31
  • how750(Lm/lw?)2/3
  • Maximum liquid rate Lm 4.7 kg/sec
  • Minimum Liquid Rate At 70 turn down ratio

  • 3.3Kg/sec
  • At Maximum rate ( how) 20 mm Liquid
  • At Minimum rate (how) 16 mm Liquid
  • hw how 50 16 66 mm Liquid
  • from fig 11.30, Coulson and Richardson Vol.6
  • K2 30.50
  • So,
  • U (min) 9 m/sec

32
  • Now maximum volumetric flow rate (vapors)
  • Base 2.12 m3/sec
  • Top 1.14 m3/sec
  • At 70 turn down ratio
  • Actual minimum vapor velocity
  • minimum vapor rate / Ah
  • 12.81 m/sec
  • So minimum vapor rate will be well above the
    weep point.

33
Plate Pressure Drop (P.D)
  • Consist of dry plate P.D (orifice loss), P.D
    due to static head of liquid and residual P.D
    (bubbles formation result in energy loss)
  • Dry Plate Drop
  • Max. Vapor velocity through holes (Uh)
    Maximum Volumetric Flow Rate / Hole Area 18.30
    m/sec
  • Perforated area Ap (active area) 1.16 m2
  • Ah/Ap 0.100

34
  • From fig. 11.34 (Coulson Richardson
  • 6th volume 3rd edition) for
  • plate thickness/hole diameter 1.00
  • We get, Co 0.84
  • This equation is derived for orifice
  • meter pressure drop.
  • hd 48 mm Liquid
  • Residual Head (hr)
  • hr (12.5103 / ?L)
  • 13.3 mm Liquid

35
  • So,
  • Total pressure drop
  • 48(5020)13.32
  • ht 131.35 mm liquid
  • Total column pressure drop Pa, (N/m2)
  • (9.8110-3) ht?LN

  • 82771.6 Pa 82 kPa

36
Down comer Liquid Backup
  • Caused by Pressure Drop over the plate and
    resistance to flow in the downcomer it self.
  • hb (hw how) ht hdc
  • The main resistance to flow in downcomer will
    be caused by constriction in the downcomer
    outlet, and head loss in the down comer can be
    estimated using the equation given as,
  • where Lwd is the liquid flow rate in
    downcomer, kg/sec
  • and Aap is the clearance area under the
    downcomer, m2
  • Aap hapLw

37
  • Where hap the height of bottom edge of apron
    above the plate.
  • hap hw (5 to 10 mm)
  • hap 40 mm
  • so,
  • Area under apron Aap 0.05 m2
  • As this is less than area of downcomer Ad so
    using Aap values in above formula.
  • So,
  • hdc 1.95 mm

38
  • As a result,
  • hb 203.24 mm
  • 0.203 m
  • hb lt ½ (Tray spacing weir height)
  • 0.20 lt 0.25
  • So tray spacing is acceptable

39
Check Residence Time
  • Sufficient residence time should be allowed in
    the downcomer for the entrained vapors to
    disengage from liquid stream to prevent aerated
    liquid being carried under the downcomer.
  • tr Ad hbc ?L/L(max)
  • tr 10 sec
  • It should be gt 3 sec. so, result is satisfactory

40
Check Entrainment
  • (un) actual velocity (maximum volumetric flow
    rate at base Vm / net area An)
  • (un) actual velocity 1.51 m/sec
  • Velocity at flooding condition Uf 1.67 m/sec
  • So Percent flooding un/ uf 0.90 90

41
  • Liquid flow factor FLV 0.056
  • From fig. 11.29 Coulson Richardson 6th
    volume 3rd edition
  • fractional entrainment ? can be found out.
  • Fractional entrainment (?) 0.0750
  • Well below the upper limit of (?) which is
    0.1. Below this the effect of entrainment on
    efficiency is small.

42
No of Holes
  • Area of 1 Hole (p/4) Dhole2
  • 0.00002 m2
  • Area of N Holes 0.1158 m2
  • So,
  • Number OF Holes 5900

43
Height of Distillation Column
  • Height of column Hc (Nact-1) Hs ?H plates

  • thickness
  • No. of plates 68
  • Tray spacing Hs 0.50 m
  • ?H 0.5 meter each for liquid hold up and
  • vapor disengagement
  • ?H1 m
  • Total thickness of trays 0.00568 0.34 m
  • So,
  • Height of column (68-1)0.50 10.34
  • 35
    meters

44

1.45m
height35m

Plate Specifications
howWeir crust
Hole diameter5mm
hap40 mm
No. of holes5900
h W50 mm
45
Specification Sheet Of Distillation Column
Identification Item Distillation column
No. required 1
Tray type Sieve tray Function Separation of
Acetic Acid from iodo methane
and Reaction by products. Operation Continuous

46
Material handled
47
Design data
48
References
  • Coulson Richardson 6th volume 3rd edition
  • Plant Design and Economics for Chemical
    Engineering
  • Coulson Richardson 2th volume 5th edition
  • Perrys Chemical engineers hand book

49
  • The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com