A Structure for In-Depth, Phenomenological Interviewing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Structure for In-Depth, Phenomenological Interviewing

Description:

Interview Two: The Details of Experience Purpose: to focus on the concrete details of the participants experience Ex. dialogue journal writing ask the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: spacesIs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Structure for In-Depth, Phenomenological Interviewing


1
A Structure for In-Depth, Phenomenological
Interviewing
  • Group 3
  • Name 9310002A Joshua 9310004A Emily
  • 9310012A Daniel 9310020A Zoe
  • 9310038A Lydia
  • Instructor Mavis Shang

2
Survey interviews with
  • Preset
  • Standardized
  • Normally closed questions

3
  • The primarily way of interview is open-ended
    questions.
  • The major task is to explore the participants
    responses to those questions.
  • The goal is to have the participant reconstruct
    his or her experience within the topic under
    study.

4
The three-interview series
  • Focused Life History
  • The Details of Experience
  • Reflection on the Meaning

5
Interview one Focused Life
History
  • The task is to put the participants experiences
    in context by asking them as mush as possible
    about their experiences according to the topic.

6
Interview Two The Details of Experience
  • Purpose to focus on the concrete details of the
    participants experience
  • Ex. dialogue journal writing
  • ? ask the participants what they do on the
    process
  • (ask their experiences rather than
    opinions)
  • ? eliciting details

7
Questions
  • Which kind of course do you use dialogue journal?
  • How often do you write dialogue journal per week?
  • Did your teacher may help you to correct your
    grammatical errors/ spelling errors?
  • After the correction, can you write more
    proficiency?

8
Interview Three Reflection on the Meaning
  • Purpose to reflect on the meaning of their
    experience
  • Meaning ? thinking
  • Making sense/ making meaning
  • ? how the factors influence participants
    present lives

9
  • We need to focus on the participants
    understanding of their experience.
  • ? to let their thinking become meaningful
  • Ex. to renew details of their experience
  • ? they may tell us from the past to now

10
Questions
  • Before you practice dialogue journal, how was
    your writing performance?
  • Does dialogue journal writing could help you to
    improve your writing ability? Why? How?
  • Did your teacher may take grades on your writing?
  • Do you write with more comfort after practicing
    dialogue journals for the duration?

11
RESPECT THE STRUCTURE
  • The sequence of interviews requires that
    interviewers to adhere to the purpose to each.
  • A logic to the interview
  • ? to lose control of their direction is to
    lose the power
  • Interviewer
  • ? providing times for participants to tell
    the stories,
  • and focus to allow the interview
    structure to work

12
LENGTH OF INTERVIEWS
  • Dolbeare Schuman (1982) used a 90-minute
    format.
  • Oh, thats too long!
  • How will we fill that amount of time?
  • How will we get a participant to agree to be
  • interviewed for that length of time?

13
  • For younger participants
  • ? use a shorter period may be appropriate
  • The interview has at least a chronological order.
  • Beginning middle
    end
  • Remember, Time is very important!
  • Open-ended time undue anxiety

14
SPACING OF INTERVIEWS
  • From 3 days to a week
  • to mull over the preceding
    interview
  • After few times talking, it may increase the
    relationship between interviewer and
    participants.

15
ALTERNATIVES TO THE STRUCTURE AND PROCESS
  • Structure
  • ? to reconstruct and reflect on their
    experience
  • Interviewer
  • ? arrange the time for the participants

16
Whose Meaning is it? Validity and reliability
  • Interviewer plays an important role in interview.
  • To avoid participants reconstructing their
    experiences.
  • The human interviewer is a good instrument to
    gather information.

17
Is it anybodys meaning?
  • People are variable.
  • Using the three-interview structure to
    incorporate features to enhance the
    accomplishment of validity.

18
  • 1. Place participants' comments in context.
  • 2. After one to three weeks, check whether their
    opinions are the same or not.
  • 3. Connect their experiences and check the
    participant who is different with others.
  • 4. The goal of the process is to understand how
    our participants understand and make meaning of
    their experiences.

19
An example of Approach Validity
  • What should be included with transcript of
    authenticity interviews?
  • A. Verbal aspects
  • a. syntax
  • b. diction

20
  • B. Nonverbal aspects
  • a. pauses
  • b. the groping for words
  • c. the self-effacing laughter

21
  • To have Validity interview-
  • 1. kept quiet
  • 2. do not interrupt
  • 3. do not redirect interviewees thinking
  • Warning
  • What we need is the thought from
  • interviewees, but not from interviewer.

22
Experience the process yourself
23
Cont.
24
  • Team up with peer
  • Arrange appointments (and in return)
  • Tape-record
  • Interviewing and being interviewed
  • Connect to the possibilities of the process

25
  • Thanks for Your Listening
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com