Dr Paul McElheron - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr Paul McElheron

Description:

Researching & Writing a Dissertation Dr Paul McElheron www.scba.dk – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:236
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: Dere1157
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr Paul McElheron


1
Researching Writing a Dissertation
  • Dr Paul McElheron
  • www.scba.dk

2
(No Transcript)
3
Things you shouldnt say at your dissertation
defence
4
Differences Dissertations Assignments
  • The Dissertation differs from Assignments
  • You need to demonstrate you can identify an
    appropriate research question
  • You have to demonstrate you know some thing about
    research methods
  • Requires a critical review of existing literature

5
The Dissertation at a Glance
  • About 15,000 words (/- 10)
  • Individual research into a management issue of
    your choice
  • In 2 parts dissertation proposal (15 of the
    marks) and dissertation
  • Graded as assignments

6
Covered in this session
  • Project proposal
  • The dissertation process
  • Getting started choosing a topic
  • Research methods
  • Writing the dissertation
  • Referencing
  • Workshop / any questions

7
What the Dissertation is NOT
  • Not a purely work-based project
  • Not the Last Word
  • Not an extended essay
  • Not Research First-Think Later
  • Not statistics for the sake of statistics

8
What the Project Might be
  • A why question that requires analysis
  • An emphasis upon problem solving research
  • The problem clearly defined
  • A method of solution discovered

9
You Are Being Asked to Do the Following
  • Identify define a research question
  • Critically review existing literature
  • Design a piece of research
  • Analyse, present discuss

10
Project Proposal
  • 15 of the total project mark
  • Minimum 2000 words
  • Project Tutors will advise on scope and
    feasibility

11
Project Proposal Framework
  • Use the University Dissertation Proposal
    Pro-Forma
  • Background and overview
  • Statement of issue and research objectives
  • Methodology
  • Analysis
  • Structure of final project
  • Time schedule
  • Can be submitted online

12
The Dissertation Process
  • Research Question
  • Literature Review
  • Research Design
  • Data Collection
  • Data Analysis
  • Conclusions
  • Implications

13
What is a Dissertation?
  • A major piece of work 15,000 words
  • Chosen individually
  • Likely to include an empirical element
  • Likely to be academic research
  • A why question problem based
  • Difficult?
  • Knowledge based on experience observation

14
Why you are asked to do a dissertation
  • Sharpen your information gathering, critical
    analytical skills
  • Enhance your subject specific knowledge
  • Relate academic theories to real world problems
  • Develop transferable skills

15
Choosing a Topic (1)
  • Personal interests relevance
  • Further your knowledge development
  • Of value to your organisation (possibly)
  • Durability/substance
  • Topic adequacy
  • A future/immediate career orientated choice
  • Access
  • Feasibility
  • Micro-politics
  • Resources

16
Choosing a Topic (2)
  • Choose something manageable
  • Choose something interesting
  • Choose something which doesnt overlap too much
    with other assessments you have submitted
  • Discuss your choice

17
The topic needs to be
  • Interesting to you
  • Feasible
  • Course-related
  • Academic
  • Analytical

18
Six stage process for choosing a topic
  • Identify broad topic academic discipline
  • Determine the scope
  • Brainstorm issues, puzzles questions
  • Map and structure the issues
  • Conduct a reconnaissance
  • Frame your research question

19
Consider Formulating the Title as a Question
  • Is an Academic Education the Best Preparation for
    a Career in the Senior Management?
  • How Far Can Western Management Training Practices
    be Used to Develop the Asia-Manager?

20
Planning your work
  • When do you want to have each chapter completed?
  • How much time will you need for primary research?
  • When must all research work be completed?
  • How much time will you need for writing up?
  • Will you need your dissertation bound in any way?

21
How Long Does it Take?
  • Organisation of ideas is the hard bit
  • You will find weaknesses/flaws only when you
    start to write up state them
  • Allow 30 of time for writing up
  • 4-6 months?

22
What is Research?
  • Research is an Original Contribution to Knowledge
  • Your must show two (maybe three) things
  • Identification of an unanswered question
  • Evidence of analysis
  • The Answer!

23
Fundamental concerns
  • Four categories of information sought
  • Attitudes or what people see/understand
  • Beliefs what people think is true, (stronger than
    attitudes)
  • Behaviour or what people do
  • Attributes or what people are
  • Validity the degree to which we are measuring
    what we need to measure
  • Reliability

24
Research Terminology
  • Methods Methodology
  • Empirical research vs theoretical
  • Epistomology

25
Epistemology what constitutes valid knowledge
and how can we obtain it?
  • Positivism social researcher as a scientist
  • Facts not values
  • Theory testing
  • Phenomenology social researcher as a detective
  • Values play a significant part
  • Theory building

26
The Methodological Continuum
  • Phenomenology
  • Theory-Building
  • Qualitative
  • 5 Depth face-to-face interviews
  • High response rates expected
  • More analytical
  • Positivism
  • Theory Testing
  • Quantitative
  • 500 closed-ended postal questionnaires
  • Low response rate expected
  • More design / implementation work

27
Choice of Research Methods
  • Data search
  • Interviews
  • Questionnaires
  • Panels, including focus groups
  • Observation
  • Delphi technique

28
The Methodology Chapter
  • Need to show knowledge of methodological debates
  • Examiners look closely at this
  • Shows what you learned about the process of
    research itself

29
Research design the University expects
  • Awareness of different approaches
  • Clear justification of the approach taken
  • Description of approach, (sampling, collection,
    analysis presentation
  • Critical presentation of the methodology
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the approach
    taken

30
Sources of Information
  • Academic journals the gold standard
  • Working Papers most peer reviewed
  • Books
  • Non-academic journals standards vary
  • Consultancy reports use for context only
  • Newspapers use for context only
  • The internet

31
Selecting the Research Method
  • What information is needed?
  • How will it be collected?
  • How accurate will it be?
  • Will the methods get all the information?
  • Will the information appear credible?
  • Will the participants conform?
  • Who will administer the methods?
  • How can the information be analysed?

32
Sampling Plan
  • Sampling unit who will be surveyed?
  • Sample size how many shall be surveyed?
  • Sampling procedure how should respondents be
    chosen?

33
Approaches to the main research methods
Unstructured Structured
Interviews In-depth, open Keep to script, answer options
Panels Focus groups Delphi
Questionnaire Research diary Tick boxes
Observation Research diary Observation schedule, Activity sampling
Data search Search engine Primary/secondary
34
Interviewing
  • Several types, arranged, intercept, structured
  • Very versatile
  • Can record additional observations
  • Expensive
  • Susceptible to interviewer bias

35
Questionnaires - advantages
  • Relatively inexpensive
  • Can reach people at long distance
  • Avoids interviewer bias
  • Anonymity possible
  • Response quality may be better, (respondents may
    gather consult sources)

36
Questionnaires - disadvantages
  • Low response rates
  • Difficult to develop rapport
  • No opportunity to probe or clarify
  • Strong tendency to give answers that are
    socially, desirable, make the respondent look
    good, please the researcher
  • Can the respondent provide a meaningful answer?
  • Biased response?
  • Easy to critique

37
Focus Group Research
  • A gathering of 6-10 people invited to spend a few
    hours with a skilled moderator to discuss a
    product, service, organisation or marketing
    entity.
  • Start with a broad question, encourage free
    easy discussion, hoping that group dynamics will
    reveal deep feelings and thoughts.

38
Focus Groups - advantages
  • Use homogenous groups, similar needs interests
  • Good for ascertaining interest or acceptance
  • Suited to motivational research, attitudes,
    perceptions
  • Used as a prelude to more sophisticated techniques

39
Focus Groups - disadvantages
  • Is it real research?
  • Biased participation?
  • Nature and direction of discussion led by the
    most articulate or aggressive
  • Conclusions have to be inferred by reading the
    discussion
  • Results cannot be quantified, (small sample)

40
Observational Research
  • Fresh data can be gathered by observing
  • Can obtain findings not accessible by other
    methods

41
Common errors made in Research
  • Selective observation
  • Inaccurate observation
  • Over-generalisation
  • Made-up information
  • Ex post facto hypothesising
  • Illogical reasoning
  • Ego involvement in understanding
  • Premature closure of inquiry
  • Mystification

42
Delphi Technique
  • A forecasting method
  • A group decision making tool reaps the benefit
    of group decision making while insulating the
    process from group decision making
  • Aids decision making in a political of emotional
    environment
  • Useful where decisions affect strong factions
    with opposing views, conflicting goals
  • Works formally or informally

43
Common errors made in research
  • I found a juicy data set and accidentally found
    that serial killers all had telephone numbers
    with the number 13 in them. I then decided that
    fear of the number 13 makes people into serial
    killers, wrote a book about my findings and
    became famous.
  • What error of human enquiry is NOT present in
    this scenario?
  • Ex post facto hypothesizing
  • Illogical reasoning
  • Made-up information
  • Inaccurate observation

44
Standard format of a dissertation 6 chapters
  • Executive summary
  • Contents
  • Introduction (1000-1500)
  • Theory/Literature review (2500-3000)
  • Research methods (1500-2000)
  • Data description, presentation of findings
    (2500-3000)
  • Analysis interpretation of findings (3500-4000)
  • Conclusions, recommendations, reflections
    (1000-1500)
  • References

45
Writing the Dissertation
  • The marker will be less knowledgeable on detail
    than you
  • Explain motivations, goals, methodology, make no
    assumptions, apart from basics
  • Get feedback, (supervisors, friends, fellow
    students give feedback too).

46
Ideas for the Introduction
  • A clear statement of your subject
  • An explanation of why the research is worthwhile
  • An outline of the methods used
  • An indication of the limitations of the study
  • A summary of the chapters to follow
  • Thanks to any person or agency who gave you
    special help

47
Ideas for the Chapters
  • Each one should answer a major question
  • Each chapter should contain lots of answers to
    smaller questions
  • Use sub-headings to guide the reader
  • Develop points carefully, step by step
  • Each chapter should make sense if read on its own
  • Give chapters introductions and conclusions as
    well

48
Writing Style Revisited
  • A review of good practice

49
A Well Written Dissertation..
  • Has an appropriate structure it flows
  • Has headings and sub-headings
  • Includes research methods background
    information
  • Demonstrates evidence of a wide range of
    information sources
  • Includes reference to relevant theory, correctly
    referenced
  • Uses both qualitative and quantitative sources of
    information
  • Is analytical rather than descriptive
  • Uses tables, figures and models to support the
    narrative
  • Makes appropriate recommendations and conclusions

50
Style of the Dissertation
  • Use a title page and number the pages
  • Put in a contents list
  • Do what you say you will do in the introduction
  • Footnotes not recommended
  • Use quotes from opposing views
  • Quotes and paraphrasing work well together
  • Avoid excessive use of bullet points
  • Plagiarism dont do it

51
Writing Style
  • Personal
  • Information comes from the writers experience
  • Personal feelings and views
  • Recounts, tells a personal story
  • Non-technical vocabulary
  • I at the centre
  • Academic
  • Information comes from a range of sources
  • Evidence argument, citing referencing others
    work
  • Comments, evaluates, analyses
  • Subject specific vocabulary
  • I as observer commentator

52
Language to Avoid
  • Obviously
  • Research shows..
  • It is true that..
  • This proves..
  • Where does this lead us?
  • Its a well known fact
  • I, we, you
  • I think
  • I feel
  • Good, bad, normal
  • Contractions
  • Jargon

53
Language to use
  • this suggests..
  • it is plausible..
  • This argument appears reasonable \ unreasonable
    because..
  • Use the terminology!

54
A Word about Word Count
  • Approximately 15,000 words stick to the format
  • The word count starts after the contents page and
    ends before the references
  • Words in the appendix dont count
  • Words in models dont count

55
Literature Review
  • The University will expect
  • Normally 40-50 credible references
  • Harvard system referencing throughout
  • Use of original sources where possible
  • Avoid the Heathrow library!

56
References
  • Closely tied to the review done early in the
    dissertation
  • Markers usually check out this section early on
    and will form preliminary assessment notions
    early
  • References must appear in the main body

57
Requirements for Referencing
  • Assertions or statements of fact
  • Theories views or arguments
  • Where information came from
  • Who created the information
  • Who collated the information

58
When to Reference
  1. Brahms wrote four symphonies
  2. Brahms compositions were driven by unrequited
    love
  3. Harry Potter was a wizard
  4. The Harry Potter books constitute a danger to the
    moral fabric of youth

59
Types of Referencing
  • Quotations
  • Paraphrasing
  • Using your own words

60
Examples
  • QUOTATION to which the automatic human
    reaction is helpless discouragement. But for the
    successful leader failure is the beginning, the
    springboard of hope. (Bennis and Nanus, 1985,
    p.71).
  • PARAPHRASE Failure is finality, a dead feeling
    of helpless discouragement. For the successful
    leader, failure can be the springboard to a new
    beginning, (Bennis Nanus, 1985).
  • OWN WORDS Bennis and Nanus (1985) point out that
    effective leaders react to failure differently
    than other people. Rather than becoming
    de-motivated and discouraged as most people do,
    leaders see failure as a challenge which rousers
    them to greater efforts and stimulates hope for
    a brighter future.
  • REFERENCE Bennis, W., and Nanus, B. (1985).
    Leaders The Strategies for Taking Charge New
    York Harper Row, p.71.

61
An Ideal List of References
  • Sources from the recommended reading
  • Recognised leaders in the field
  • Some up-to-date sources
  • Something the marker has not yet read
  • Contextualised information

62
Conclusions
  • Short concise statements of inferences made as a
    result of work done (numbered subsections ?)
  • Must be directly related to the research
    question/problems raised
  • Markers will scrutinise this section
  • Future research useful to people following in
    your tracks

63
Recommendations
  • Suggest ways of solving the problems
  • How the recommendations link to the aims of the
    dissertation
  • Timescale and ressource allocation
  • Should flow logically from the conclusions

64
Reflections
  • Analysis evaluation of the research process
  • Strengths weaknesses of the dissertation
  • Problems or constraints encountered

65
Think of the Marker
  • Make no unreasonable assumptions about the marker
  • Dont bore the marker
  • Markers hate to work hard on trivia, (to
    understand poorly named sections, organise
    themselves from your work, wade through bad
    grammar).
  • Create a good impression
  • Refer to QAA Assessment criteria for M Level

66
Appendices
  • Designed to let you include material not fitted
    easily into any chapter
  • Important material referred to in more than one
    chapter
  • Does not count against word count
  • Material which casts light on work done but would
    impede the clear delivery of ideas
  • Mathematical proofs unless prime focus
  • Huge tables of data
  • Lengthy company profiles

67
Support - Blackboard
  • Announcements
  • ULMC staff
  • Project guidelines / support materials
  • Library / external links
  • Discussion boards
  • Study skills
  • Example dissertations

68
The Pub Bore Test
  • Write an interesting account of your
    dissertation, in a few sentences, that you could
    use when someone in the pub asks, What is your
    research about? It has to be something to catch
    the listeners attention.

69
Why writing a dissertation is harder than having
a baby
  • Conceiving a baby is way more fun that conceiving
    a topic
  • You know exactly how long pregnancy takes
  • Everyone will admire your baby
  • No one will complain that your baby is too
    similar to another one
  • You can borrow other peoples stuff without it
    being called plagiarism

70
Youre Almost There
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com