Title: Soviet Union
1Soviet Union
- Foreign Affairs
- 1929 - 1941
2Foreign Policy in the 1920s
- Memories of Civil War
- Foreign Intervention
- British, French, US, Japanese
- Capitalists fundamentally opposed to Communist
system - Lenin and Trotskys World View
- Marxism was a global phenomenon
- The Revolution had to be exported ASAP
- Russo-Polish War of 1920
- See-Saw War
- Both sides Overextended themselves
- Narrowly averted a disaster allowed Whites to
Resurrect Civil War in South of Russia
3- Comrade Lenin cleans the world of filth.
- The Promise of exporting Revolution
- COMINTERN set up in 1919 to achieve World
Revolution
4The Bolshevik Dilemma
- How to deal with the nations of the world
- Work to undermine them
- Or
- Develop Diplomatic relations with them
- Consider advantages/disadvantages for both of the
them!
5Sources Author Date Desire to Spread World Revolution Socialism in One Coutnry
6Source 1
- Comrade Lenin cleans the world of filth.
- 1920
7Source 2
- We have always and repeatedly pointed out to the
workers that the underlying chief task and basic
condition of our victory is the propagation of
revolution at least to several of the more
advanced countries - Lenin, Feb 1921
8Source 3
- We go to it because trade with Capitalist
countries (so long as they have not altogether
collapsed) is unconditionally necessary for us - Lenin explaining why he was attending the
International Conference at Genoa in 1922
9Source 4
- The way out lies only in the victory of the
Proletariat of the advanced countries. Viewed
from this standpoint, a national revolution is
not a self-contained whole it is only a link in
the internal chain. The international revolution
constitutes a permanent process, despite declines
and ebbs. - Trotsky, 1930
10Source 5
- The ensuring of peace cannot depend on our
efforts alone, it requires the collaboration and
co-operation of other states. While therefore
trying to establish and maintain relations with
all states, we are giving special attention to
strengthening and making close our relations with
those which, like us, give proof of their sincere
desire to maintain peace and are ready to resist
those who break the peace. - Litvinov, 1933
11Source 6
- The USSR would never be swayed by alliances with
this or that foreign power, be it France, Poland
or Germany, but would always base her policy on
self-interest - Stalin, 1934
12Source 7
- We toilers of the Soviet Union must count on our
own efforts in defending our affairs and, above
all, on our Red Army in the defence of our
Country - Molotov, 1936
13Source 8
- This time we shall observe the contest between
Germany and the Western powers and shall not
intervene in the conflict until we ourselves feel
it fit to do so in order to bring about the
decision - Litvinov to Czech FO, 1938
14Source 9
- England and France have rejected the policy of
collective securityand taken a position of
non-interventionthe policy of non-intervention
reveals an eagerness not to hinder Germany from
embroiling herself in a war with the Soviet
Union be cautious and do not allow Soviet Russia
to be drawn into the conflicts by wargmongers who
are accustomed to have others pull their
chestnuts out of the fire. - Stalin, 1939
15Source 10
16Development of Soviet Foreign Policy
- Phase 1 (1917 8)
- Revolutionary Period
- Phase 2 (1918 1920)
- Civil War Period
- Phase 3 (1921 1927)
- Recovery and Peace
- Phase 4 (1928 1933)
- The Left Turn
- Phase 5 (1933 1938)
- Collective Security
- Phase 6 (1938 1941)
- Self-Preservation
17Development of Soviet Foreign Policy - Phase One
- The Revolutionary Period
- October 1917
- Bolshevik Revolution
- February 1918
- Cancellation of all Foreign debts
- March 1918
- Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
- Humiliating but a price worth paying according to
Lenin - Allows Bolsheviks to consolidate power
18Phase Two
- The Civil War
- 1918 - 1919
- Foreign Intervention in Civil War
- March 1919
- COMINTERN established
- Apr-Oct 1920
- Russo-Polish War
- Nov 1920
- Evacuation of Crimea
19G. V. ChicherinForeign Commissioner 1918 - 1930
- Ex-Menshevik and Ex-Aristocrat
- Worked for Tsarist Foreign Ministry
- Educated but emotional
- Converted to Bolshevism whilst forcibly sent on
holiday to Cure his Homosexuality Chance
meeting with Lenin - Pro-German
- Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
- Treaty of Rapallo
- Anti-British
- Had been imprisoned by British 1917 1918 for
anti-war - Disliked Curzon
- Advocated policy of engagement
- Engage Capitalists in order to stop them uniting
against Communist Russia - Not a member of the Politburo
20Phase Three
- Recovery and Peace 1921 1927
- 1921
- Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement
- 1922
- Treaty of Rapallo
- 1923
- Curzon Ultimatum over Central Asian communist
adventures - Threatened suspension of trade agreement
- 1924
- USSR officially recognised by GB, France Italy
- Forged Zinoviev Letter
- COMINTERN urging propaganda in British Armed
Forces - Victorious Conservatives cold shouldered USSR for
a year - 1926
- Treaty of Berlin extended Treaty of Rapallo
- General Strike in Britain Comintern involvement
- Socialism in One Country idea proposed by Stalin
- 1927
- Chinese communists massacred by Chiang Kai Shek
21Why did Soviet Foreign Policy become more
Conservative in the 1920s?
- Russian Polish War disaster
- Bolshevik Consolidation
- Internal positioning within Politburo
- Conservatives backed safe Stalin
- Leftists backed the more aggressive Trotsky
- Economic Disaster in Post World War One and Post
Civil War Russia - Economically backward when Tsarist
- Myriad National Identities within USSR
- Plenty to keep Red Army busy regaining the old
borders of Tsarist Russia - Fear of Capitalists
- Had to prepare for a re-invasion of Foreigners
- Fear of Proxy wars
- Capitalists might use Turks, Poles or Persians to
reignite RCW - Avoid War on Two Fronts Japan and Germany
- Unstable Borders
- Germany, China, Japan in Korea, British in India
22Relations with Britain
- 1921 Anglo-Soviet Trade Agreement
- Positive on both sides
- Pragmatic
- Conservatives suspicious of Communists
- Seizure of private property
- Curzon ultimatum 1923
- Zinoviev letter
- Arcos Raid 1927
- Soviet Trade delegation accused of spying
- Diplomatic relations suspended
- Labour shifts from positive to suspicious
- Recognises USSR 1924
- 1926 General Strike
- TUC returns 26,000 cheque
- Labelled Social Fascists by Stalin in 1930
- 1918 1922
- Lloyd George Liberal Coalition
- 1922 23
- Conservative
- 1924
- First ever Labour minority government
- 1924 1929
- Conservative
- 1929 1931
- Labour minority
- 1931 1940
- National governments
23Relations with Germany
- Rapallo Treaty 1922
- Stresemann stabilises Eastern borders
- Helps get around T of V
- Active Comintern activity in uprisings
- 1919, 1921, 1923
- Locarno Treaties
- Worried Soviets that Germans were being
reintegrated into Europe - Treaty of Berlin 1926
- Included pledge of Neutrality if either were
attacked by a Third nation
- Weak Weimar Governments
- Conservative Stresemann most positive towards
USSR - Germany has enough problems!
- SPD hostile to USSR due to uncompromising
attitude of KPD - Rising spectre of Nazis
- 1933 electoral success
- Hitler represented the final stage of monopoly
capitalism he would inflame social tensions
making revolution more likely in Germany - Stalin
24Phase 4 The Left Turn
- Follows Stalins Domestic U-Turn
- Ditched Bukharins Right Wing Policies
- Stalin able to dominate Politburo and Comintern
- Bukharin replaced by compliant Molotov
- Foreign Communist Party leaders replaced
- Intellectuals replaced by pliant working class
- German Communist Party Scandal Corrupt
Thaelmann reinstated by Stalin - Back to basics (and Anti-Trotskyite)
- Socialists labelled as Social Fascists and
Counter-Revolutionaries - KPD fails to help SPD as a result
- Nach Hitler Uns After Hitler Us
25M. M. LitvinovForeign Commissar 1930 - 1939
- Chicherins deputy in 1920s
- Ex-Menshevik, Jewish
- Married to a British woman
- Talented negotiator
- Proposed Disarmament first
- Helps to defend USSR
- Helps Communist Revolutions
- Kellogg-Briand Pact
- Pro-British
- Anti-German
- Proposed Collective Security otherwise
- In favour of League of Nations
- Joins in 1934
- Not a member of the Politburo
26Phase 5 Collective Security
- March 1934
- Trade agreement with Germany
- Sept 1934
- League of Nations - Litvinovs Collective
Security Policy - May 1935
- Pacts with France and Czechoslovakia
- August 1935
- COMINTERN supports Popular Fronts
- 1936 1939
- Spanish Civil War
- Nov 1936
- Anti-COMINTERN pact of Germany Japan (Italy
1937) - Sep 1938
- Munich agreement (USSR excluded)
- 1938/9
- Japanese military attacks in Far East (Manchukuo)
- April 1939
- Litvinov proposes triple Military alliance
Britain, France and USSR - May 1939
27Spanish Civil War
- Intervention or Non-Intervention?
- Second Republic established 1931
- Republicans, Socialists, Communists, Anarchists,
Separatists - Traditional Nationalist Hostile
- Army, Catholic Church, Landowners, Centralists
- Nazi Germany and Italy supported Nationalists
- Britain and France wanted to let Spain sort
itself out. - Stalins dilemma?
- What should he do?
28Reasons to intervene
- Ideological battle
- Communism versus Fascism
- Soviet Security
- Keep Germany and Italy busy
- Help Natural anti-German ally France from being
surrounded by Fascists - Fight Trotskyites
- Trotskyite Communists were flocking to Spain to
show a viable alternative form of Communism from
Stalinism - Military practice
- Allow hardware and tactics to be tried out on the
battlefield - Prestige
- Be seen as standing up to the forces of Fascism
29Reasons not to intervene
- Strategic Concerns
- Spain is far from Soviet borders
- Reaction of Italy and Germany
- Force the two countries closer together in an
Anti-Communist crusade - Reaction of Britain and France
- A successful communist intervention might scare
Britain and France closer to Germans - Show disregard for League of Nations and of
collective security - Domestic Concerns
- Busy with anti-Trotskyite Purges
- Military in particular
- Five year plans less successful than hoped for
- USSR not prepared for sustained war of any kind
30Stalins Decision
- Limited Secret Intervention
- Can help fight Fascists but avoid any blame if
intervention fails (or succeeds) - Particularly worried about the position of France
- Helping to keep France Democratic and not fall
into hands of Fascists. - NKVD directed to control Comintern activities
- Channel funds
- Ship goods secretly
- Via neutral countries
- Kindly volunteer to look after Spanish Gold
Reserves - Caballero Letter, 1936
- Calm down Communist demands
- No social or economic radicalism
- Foreign property to be respected
- Attract non-communist sympathisers
31(No Transcript)
32Civil War within a Civil War
- Barcelona, 1937
- Safe in Republican hands but Anarchists and POUM
(Trotskyite Communists) think that Republican
(and Soviet) Communists are being too pragmatic - Uprising Fighting in the Streets
- Stalin asks NKVD to crush POUM
- Feeds into Purges in USSR
- People being denounced left, right and centre
- NKVD executing anyone accused of being
Trotskyite - Infighting fatally weakened Republicans and
allowed united Nationalists to ultimately triumph
by 1939
33Was it worth it?
- Positives
- 4th largest Gold Reserves in the world
- Seen Fascist Equipment and Tactics in Operation
- Limited Trotskyism as an international
alternative to Stalinism - Negatives
- Failed to save Republican Spain
- Seen Fascist Equipment and Tactics in Operation
- Ruthless Communist tactics revealed to the world
- Infighting and purges discredited Communism
- Serving Officers and Diplomats were tainted by
exposure to Trotskyite ideas - Most executed or re-educated on return
- Experiences wasted
- Britain and France less than impressed by their
potential ally - Nail in coffin of Litvinovs collective security
philosophy
34What! No Chair for me?
35Czechoslovakian Crisis
- Stalins last attempt at Collective Security
- Willing to consider aiding Czechs
- However,
- No Physical border with Czechs
- Polish antipathy
- French and British allied to Poles
- Allies found it frustrating dealing with one
dictator let alone a second. - Allies suspicious of Communist motives after
Spanish Civil War debacle - Mussolini was supposed to be the neutral Referee
hostile to USSR - Lessons learnt
- Stalin Trust no-one USSR must look after its
own security - Hitler The Allies are weak and divided
- Chamberlain and Briand Allies made to look
ridiculous determination not to be pushed
around again - Reaffirm Polish treaties
- Further antagonises Stalin
36MolotovForeign Commissar 1939 - 1949
- Replaced anti-German Litvinov
- Litvinov had failed to cement deal with British
and French - Stalin stooge
- The ultimate Yes Man
- Leader of Comintern from 1929
- Member of Politburo
- Stalins Deputy
37The Nazi Soviet Pact
- The most startling diplomatic event of the 1930s
- One week before Second World War
- Treaty of Neutrality
- Secret Additional Protocol
- Carved up hated Poland and marked out spheres of
influence in Eastern Europe - Why
- Relative weakness of Russian Armed Services
- 1938 purge of Red Army
- Japan border disputes
- Open warfare in Siberia
- One enemy at a time
- Worried at being surrounded
- Relative ineffectiveness of Five year plans
- Not delivering fully advertised output
- Need more time to deal with German army
- Create a Buffer zone for added defence against
German Army - Not yet fully aware of capabilities of German
Army - Pre-Blitzkrieg
- Hopes France and Germany will fight long drawn
out attritional war a la WWI
38Phase 6 Nazi Soviet Love-in
- 8 May 1939
- Britain rejects military alliance with Russia
- 20th May 1939
- Germany asks for trade talks
- 27th May 1939
- Chamberlain restarts talks with Russia
- 18th July
- Soviets offer Trade deal to Germans
- 23rd July
- Britain and France ask for military talks
- Drax arrives 11th August
- 14th August 1939
- Ribbentrop asks to see Stalin personally
- 19th August
- Anglo-Soviet negotiations break down
- German Soviet Trade deal announced
- 20th August
- Hitler asks Stalin to meet Ribbentrop
- 21st August
39- The Government of the German Reich and The
Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics desirous of strengthening the cause of
peace between Germany and the U.S.S.R., and
proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the
Neutrality Agreement concluded in April, 1926
between Germany and the U.S.S.R., have reached
the following Agreement - Article I. Both High Contracting Parties obligate
themselves to desist from any act of violence,
any aggressive action, and any attack on each
other, either individually or jointly with other
Powers. - Article II. Should one of the High Contracting
Parties become the object of belligerent action
by a third Power, the other High Contracting
Party shall in no manner lend its support to this
third Power. - Article III. The Governments of the two High
Contracting Parties shall in the future maintain
continual contact with one another for the
purpose of consultation in order to exchange
information on problems affecting their common
interests. - Article IV. Should disputes or conflicts arise
between the High Contracting Parties shall
participate in any grouping of Powers whatsoever
that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other
party. - Article V. Should disputes or conflicts arise
between the High Contracting Parties over
problems of one kind or another, both parties
shall settle these disputes or conflicts
exclusively through friendly exchange of opinion
or, if necessary, through the establishment of
arbitration commissions. - Article VI. The present Treaty is concluded for a
period of ten years, with the proviso that, in so
far as one of the High Contracting Parties does
not advance it one year prior to the expiration
of this period, the validity of this Treaty shall
automatically be extended for another five years.
- Article VII. The present treaty shall be ratified
within the shortest possible time. The
ratifications shall be exchanged in Berlin. The
Agreement shall enter into force as soon as it is
signed.
40- Secret Additional Protocol.
- Article I. In the event of a territorial and
political rearrangement in the areas belonging to
the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania
shall represent the boundary of the spheres of
influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this
connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna
area is recognized by each party. - Article II. In the event of a territorial and
political rearrangement of the areas belonging to
the Polish state, the spheres of influence of
Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded
approximately by the line of the rivers Narev,
Vistula and San. - The question of whether the interests of both
parties make desirable the maintenance of an
independent Polish States and how such a state
should be bounded can only be definitely
determined in the course of further political
developments. - In any event both Governments will resolve this
question by means of a friendly agreement. - Article III. With regard to Southeastern Europe
attention is called by the Soviet side to its
interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares
its complete political disinteredness in these
areas. - Article IV. This protocol shall be treated by
both parties as strictly secret.
41Essay Question
- Did Stalin make the correct strategic decision by
signing the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939? - Debate
- The failure of Collective Security in Europe in
the late 1930s was not the fault of Stalin.
Discuss - Stalins Foreign Policy was an extension of his
Domestic Politics. Discuss.