Processing Micro CT Bone Density Images - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Processing Micro CT Bone Density Images

Description:

Processing Micro CT Bone Density Images NASA SHARP Student: Paul Nelson NASA Mentor: John DaPonte Ph. D. Team Members: Michael Clark, Elizabeth Wood, Thomas Sadowski ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: education70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Processing Micro CT Bone Density Images


1
Processing Micro CT Bone Density Images
  • NASA SHARP Student Paul Nelson NASA Mentor
    John DaPonte Ph. D.
  • Team Members Michael Clark, Elizabeth Wood,
    Thomas Sadowski, Paul Thomas
  • Southern Connecticut State University (SCSU),
    Computer Science Department
  • Suny Stonybook University NASA SHARP Program

2
Project Overview
Original Image
After a few programs including deconvolution
  • 6 sets of high resolution (10.5µm), 8 sets of low
    resolution (17.5µm) image stacks of approximately
    86 micro CT mouse images of trabeculae before and
    after exposure to weightlessness
  • Iterative deconvolution, no pre-processing and
    Gaussian blur.
  • Iterative deconvolution was qualitatively better
    then Gaussian blur and no pre-processing
  • Provide quantitative verification of the
    qualitative findings through numerical evaluation
    of data obtained from a variety of programs

3
Current Work
  • Areas of focus for this bone density study
    include the fractal dimension, entropy
    enhancement (EME), bone area, bone thickness, SMI
    , and BV/TV
  • A majority of these parameters have already been
    collected for high/low resolution images

4
Calculations Background
  • Bone Volume/Tissue Volume (BV/TV) Total Bone
    Volume

  • Total Tissue Volume
  • Structure Model Index (SMI) 6x(SxV/S2)
  • SChange in Surface Area Caused by Dilation,

    SObject Surface Area Before Dilation,
    VInitial Volume
  • Bone Area Pixel Ratio (BAPR) of Bone Pixels In
    Threshold Image
  • Total of Pixels
  • Trabecular Thickness Pixel Ratio (TTPR) of
    Bone Pixels In Threshold Image
  • of Bone
    Pixels In Skelonized Image

5
High/Low Res. Comparison Data
6
High/Low Res. Conclusions
  • The average bone thickness for the low resolution
    images showed a slight thinning for deconvolution
    and greater thickening by the Gaussian
  • The deconvolved data was closer to the data with
    no pre-processing
  • For the high resolution images this feature is
    further shown because the Gaussian was thickened
    greatly and the deconvolved averages to about the
    same as the no pre-processing
  • The average bone area for the low resolution
    image showed trends similar to average bone
    thickness
  • This difference is not as large for the Gaussian
    as in the large for deconvolution in the high
    resolution images.

7
BV/TV Graphs and Conclusions
  • For BV/TV the bone loss is lower for those mice
    that experienced more bone loss and higher for
    those that experienced less bone loss
  • After suspension occurs, BV/TV always decreases
  • The SMI appears inversely related to the BV/TV
    according to these graphs

8
Future Work
  • To date, the fractal dimension values have yet to
    be compiled. Theses parameters will continue to
    be analyzed to identify any trends that might
    allow for the separation of more from less bone
    loss and before and after experiencing
    weightlessness.
  • A planned future parameter of study is
    connectivity analysis.

9
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com