Achieving Radiographic Quality: Image Formation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Achieving Radiographic Quality: Image Formation

Description:

Achieving Radiographic Quality: Image Formation Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance Patient Motion Decrease in radiographic detail Fuzzy or blurry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1286
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: vetPurdu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Achieving Radiographic Quality: Image Formation


1
Achieving Radiographic QualityImage Formation
2
IMAGE FORMATION
  • Radiographic usefulness limited by quality of
    image on recording surface
  • Technicians must understand
  • how to produce diagnostic radiographs
  • proper radiographic terminology
  • factors affecting radiographic appearance

3
Terminology for Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject (Patient)
  • Density
  • Thickness
  • Contrast
  • Radiographic (Film)
  • Density
  • Contrast
  • Detail

4
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject (Patient) Density
  • Ability of different bodily tissues to absorb
    x-rays
  • Two factors determine subject density
  • Average Atomic Number of tissue
  • Thickness of tissue

5
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Average Atomic Number
  • Bone - calcium (atomic 20) phosphorus (atomic
    15) absorbs greater amount of x-rays
  • Muscle - hydrogen (atomic 1) and nitrogen
    (atomic 7) absorbs lesser amount of x-rays

6
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Average Atomic Number
  • Finished radiographs contain white, black gray
    areas
  • These differences caused by different tissue
    absorption rates

7
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Atomic Number
  • High Atomic NumberIncreased Density
  • Increased DensityIncreased Absorption
  • Increased AbsorptionWhite Appearance
  • Low Atomic Decreased Density
  • Decreased Density Decreased Absorption
  • Decreased Absorption Black Appearance

8
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Atomic Number
  • Tissues from least density (low atomic) to most
    density (high atomic)
  • Air Bubbles Black
  • Fat Blubber Dark Gray-Light Black
  • Muscle/Water Biceps Gray
  • Bone Bone Light Gray-Light White
  • Metal Bullet Bright White

9
Describing Radiographic Appearance Subject
Density
Figure 2-2 p. 11 Han Hurd 3rd edition
10
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Atomic Number
  • Metal bone appear white/light on finished
    radiographs due to increased density, high atomic
    number increased absorption rate
  • Air water appear black/dark on finished
    radiographs due to decreased density, low atomic
    number decreased absorption rate

11
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density Thickness vs. Absorption
  • Thickness of subject densities also affects
    amount of x-rays absorbed
  • Thicker subject densities more x-ray absorption
    whiter radiographic appearance
  • Thinner subject densities less absorption
    darker radiographic appearance

12
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Densities vs. Radiographic Contrast
  • Radiographic variations in subject densities
    between adjacent areas
  • High subject contrast-mostly blacks whites
    within adjacent areas (dark air in lung next to
    white heart tissue)
  • Low subject contrast-mostly shades of gray within
    adjacent areas (light gray liver next to dark
    gray stomach)

13
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Radiographic Density
  • Degree of blackness on finished radiograph
  • Occurs on areas of film receiving exposure to
    x-rays
  • Produced by deposits of black metallic silver in
    film emulsion layer

14
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Radiographic Density
  • Increased (darkened) by increasing milliamperage
    (mA), exposure time (s)
  • Decreased (lightened) by decreasing milliamperage
    (mA), exposure time (s)
  • mAs primarily controls radiographic density

15
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Radiographic Density
  • When an image contains excessive radiographic
    density (too much blackness resulting from too
    high of mAs) it is termed OVEREXPOSED
  • When an image does not contain enough
    radiographic density (too much whiteness from too
    low of mAs) it is termed UNDEREXPOSED

16
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Radiographic Contrast
  • Divided into
  • Overall Radiographic Contrast
  • Scale of Radiographic Contrast

17
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Overall Radiographic Contrast
  • Controlled by mAs
  • Degree of difference between blacks and whites
  • High Overall Contrast large degree of difference
    between blacks whites
  • Low Overall Contrast small degree of difference
    between blacks whites

18
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Scale of Radiographic Contrast
  • Controlled by kVp which is the penetration power
    of the x-ray beam
  • Percentage of blacks and whites verses percentage
    of shades of gray on finished radiograph
  • Two types
  • Short Scale
  • Long Scale

19
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Short Scale of Radiographic Contrast or Decreased
    kVp
  • Large percentage of blacks whites with small
    percentage of varying shades of grays
  • Associated with lower kVp and less penetration
    power

20
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Long Scale of Radiographic Contrast or Increased
    kVp
  • Small percentage of blacks and whites with large
    percentage of varying shades of grays
  • Associated with higher kVp and more penetration
    power

21
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Scale of Radiographic Contrast - kVp
  • When an image contains an excessive or too long
    of scale of contrast (too much kVp resulting from
    too high of penetration power) it is termed
    OVERPENETRATED
  • When an image does not contain enough or too
    short of scale of contrast (too little kVp
    resulting from too low of penetration power) it
    is termed UNDERPENETRATED

22
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Ideal Radiographic Scale of Contrast
  • For most radiographic studies a longer scale of
    radiographic contrast is preferred
  • There should be many varying shades of grays
    some light, some dark and some medium shades
  • There should also be a few blacks and whites
    mixed in as well
  • The ideal scale should be longer but also must be
    BALANCED to be diagnostic

23
Describing Radiographic Appearance
  • Radiographic Detail
  • Sharp, crisp well defined tissue interfaces on
    finished radiograph
  • Diagnostic radiographs demonstrate excellent
    detail

24
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density
  • Subject Thickness
  • mAs Level
  • kVp Level
  • Film Contrast
  • Film Scale
  • Film Fogging

25
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Exposure Latitude
  • Patient Motion
  • Penumbra
  • Focal Spot Size (FSS)
  • Focal Film Distance (FFD)
  • Object Film Distance (OFD)
  • Geometric Distortion

26
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Subject Density
  • Higher subject density whiter radiographic
    appearance
  • Lower subject density darker radiographic
    appearance

27
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • KVP Level
  • Higher kVp
  • Longer radiographic scale of contrast
  • Fewer blacks whites - more grays
  • Lower kVp
  • Shorter radiographic scale of contrast
  • More blacks whites - fewer grays

28
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Film Contrast
  • X-Ray film has its own inherent contrast
  • manufactured to produce either long or short
    scale of contrast
  • Long film scale more grays
  • Short film scale more blacks whites

29
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Film Scale
  • Film producing long scale of contrast long
    latitude film
  • Film producing short scale of contrast contrast
    film
  • Long latitude film preferred for most general
    radiography

30
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Exposure Latitude
  • Range of exposures that produces a film density
    of diagnostic quality
  • Long scale of film contrast contains more
    exposure latitude
  • Short scale of film contrast contains less
    exposure latitude
  • Benefit minor exposure errors forgiven

31
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Film Fogging
  • Loss of clarity lack of crispness
  • Loss of tissue definition
  • Lack of serosal surface detail
  • Decreased sharpness between adjacent tissues on
    finished radiograph
  • Overall dull grayed out appearance

32
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Film Fogging caused by
  • low grade light leaks in darkroom
  • heat humidity
  • improper processing
  • scatter radiation (to be defined in future
    lecture)
  • Film Fogging results in greatly decreased ability
    to distinguish between differing densities of
    adjacent tissue interfaces on finished radiograph

33
Imaging Terminology Film Fogging Example
Figure 2-3 p. 12 Han Hurd 3rd edition
34
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Patient Motion
  • Decrease in radiographic detail
  • Fuzzy or blurry appearance
  • Poorly defined tissue interfaces

35
Imaging TerminologyPatient Motion Example
No Patient Motion
Patient Motion
36
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Penumbra
  • Blurring or loss of definition at tissue
    interfaces
  • Decreases radiographic detail
  • Penumbra increased by
  • Increased Focal Spot Size (FSS)
  • Decreased Focal Film Distance (FFD)
  • Increased Object Film Distance (OFD)

37
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Focal Spot Size Penumbra
  • Why not just decrease focal spot size to decrease
    penumbra?
  • Because smaller focal spot size less heat
    dissipation
  • Heat build-up can damage equipment!

38
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Focal Spot Size Penumbra
  • Large actual focal spot used to create small
    effective focal spot
  • Small effective focal spot greatly reduces
    penumbra
  • small as possible to create detailed films
  • large enough to prevent overheating

39
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance Example
Figure 2-6 p. 14 Han Hurd 3rd edition
40
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Focal Film Distance Penumbra
  • Distance from focal spot to film
  • Average FFD - 36-40 inches
  • Decreasing FFD increases penumbra
  • Increasing FFD decreases penumbra

41
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • FFD Penumbra Example

Figure 2-7 p. 14 Han Hurd 3rd edition
42
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Focal Film Distance Penumbra
  • Do NOT increase FFD above 3640 Increasing FFD
    decreases intensity of x-rays
  • Decreased intensity fewer x-rays available to
    expose film
  • Fewer x-rays decreased density non-diagnostic
    radiograph

43
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • FFD, Penumbra Inverse Square Law
  • Why cant intensity of x-ray beam be increased to
    overcome decreased density due to increased FFD?
  • Unsafe to do so because of Inverse Square Law

44
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
  • Intensity of x-ray beam decreases at a rate
    inverse to square of distance
  • If FFD doubled, then mAs must increase 4 times to
    maintain same radiographic density!

45
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
  • Remember increasing mAs also increases exposure
    time
  • Increased time increased chance of patient
    movement
  • Patient motion always a problem in veterinary
    radiography!

46
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
  • Therefore For most radiographic procedures, a
    focal film distance (FFD) of 3640 inches is
    sufficient to minimize penumbra effect, obey
    inverse square law and maintain proper
    radiographic density

47
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Penumbra Object Film Distance
  • OFD - distance from recording surface to
    area/tissue being imaged
  • Increasing OFD increases penumbra magnifies
    area being imaged
  • Maintain as short/small OFD as possible

Figure 2-9 p. 15 Han Hurd 3rd edition
48
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance FSS,
FFD, OFD Penumbra
  • No practical way to totally eliminate penumbra
    effect
  • However a combination of 11-20 degree FSS,
    36-40 inch FFD minimal OFD will minimize
    penumbra produce detailed diagnostic radiographs

49
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image Geometry
  • Tissue shape must be accurately recorded for
    diagnostic radiographic production
  • Distortion of tissue shape by improper
    positioning can inaccurate interpretation
  • Important to understand geometric projection of
    tissue shape onto recording surface

50
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image Geometry Causes of Distortion
  • Foreshortening
  • Magnification
  • False Narrowing

51
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image Geometry Foreshortening
  • Subject appears shortened on finished image
    true length not accurately represented
  • Subject being imaged must be parallel to
    recording surface or foreshortening occurs
  • Foreshortening most often seen when imaging long
    bones

52
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Example Foreshortening
  • One end of subject further away from recording
    surface than other
  • Subject appears shorter wider than true size

Figure 2-9 p. 15 Han Hurd 3rd edition
53
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image Geometry Magnification
  • Subject must be as close to recording surface as
    possible
  • Increased OFD increased size of image
    magnification
  • Increased magnification increased penumbra
    blurring loss of detail

54
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
Magnification
Figure 2-10 p. 16 Han Hurd 3rd edition
55
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image Geometry False Narrowing
  • Occurs most frequently in tissues with adjacent
    radiolucent radiodense areas - vertebrae
  • Joint spaces appear narrower than true size

56
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • False Narrowing
  • Increased distance from center of primary beam
    cause x-rays to strike subject area at increasing
    angles
  • False narrowing occurs as result of these angles
  • These areas must be parallel to recording surface
    or false narrowing occurs

57
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • False Narrowing Example
  • Lateral recumbent cervical spine
  • Naturally sags at mid-point
  • Sagging creates false narrowing of joint spaces
    causing possible misinterpretation
  • Add padding to mid cervical region, making
    vertebral area parallel to recording surface

58
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance False
Narrowing
Properly Padded Joints
Falsly Narrowed Joints
Figure 2-11 p. 16 Han Hurd 3rd edition
59
Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
  • Image GeometryFalse Narrowing
  • To Prevent false narrowing
  • make several exposures of vertebral column
    centering over different areas
  • center primary beam over joint of interest to
    maximize joint space
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com