Title: Achieving Radiographic Quality: Image Formation
1Achieving Radiographic QualityImage Formation
2IMAGE FORMATION
- Radiographic usefulness limited by quality of
image on recording surface - Technicians must understand
- how to produce diagnostic radiographs
- proper radiographic terminology
- factors affecting radiographic appearance
3Terminology for Radiographic Appearance
- Subject (Patient)
- Density
- Thickness
- Contrast
- Radiographic (Film)
- Density
- Contrast
- Detail
4Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject (Patient) Density
- Ability of different bodily tissues to absorb
x-rays - Two factors determine subject density
- Average Atomic Number of tissue
- Thickness of tissue
5Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Average Atomic Number
- Bone - calcium (atomic 20) phosphorus (atomic
15) absorbs greater amount of x-rays - Muscle - hydrogen (atomic 1) and nitrogen
(atomic 7) absorbs lesser amount of x-rays
6Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Average Atomic Number
- Finished radiographs contain white, black gray
areas - These differences caused by different tissue
absorption rates
7Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Atomic Number
- High Atomic NumberIncreased Density
- Increased DensityIncreased Absorption
- Increased AbsorptionWhite Appearance
- Low Atomic Decreased Density
- Decreased Density Decreased Absorption
- Decreased Absorption Black Appearance
8Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Atomic Number
- Tissues from least density (low atomic) to most
density (high atomic) - Air Bubbles Black
- Fat Blubber Dark Gray-Light Black
- Muscle/Water Biceps Gray
- Bone Bone Light Gray-Light White
- Metal Bullet Bright White
9Describing Radiographic Appearance Subject
Density
Figure 2-2 p. 11 Han Hurd 3rd edition
10Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Atomic Number
- Metal bone appear white/light on finished
radiographs due to increased density, high atomic
number increased absorption rate - Air water appear black/dark on finished
radiographs due to decreased density, low atomic
number decreased absorption rate
11Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density Thickness vs. Absorption
- Thickness of subject densities also affects
amount of x-rays absorbed - Thicker subject densities more x-ray absorption
whiter radiographic appearance - Thinner subject densities less absorption
darker radiographic appearance
12Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Densities vs. Radiographic Contrast
- Radiographic variations in subject densities
between adjacent areas - High subject contrast-mostly blacks whites
within adjacent areas (dark air in lung next to
white heart tissue) - Low subject contrast-mostly shades of gray within
adjacent areas (light gray liver next to dark
gray stomach)
13Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Radiographic Density
- Degree of blackness on finished radiograph
- Occurs on areas of film receiving exposure to
x-rays - Produced by deposits of black metallic silver in
film emulsion layer
14Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Radiographic Density
- Increased (darkened) by increasing milliamperage
(mA), exposure time (s) - Decreased (lightened) by decreasing milliamperage
(mA), exposure time (s) - mAs primarily controls radiographic density
15Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Radiographic Density
- When an image contains excessive radiographic
density (too much blackness resulting from too
high of mAs) it is termed OVEREXPOSED - When an image does not contain enough
radiographic density (too much whiteness from too
low of mAs) it is termed UNDEREXPOSED
16Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Radiographic Contrast
- Divided into
- Overall Radiographic Contrast
- Scale of Radiographic Contrast
17Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Overall Radiographic Contrast
- Controlled by mAs
- Degree of difference between blacks and whites
- High Overall Contrast large degree of difference
between blacks whites - Low Overall Contrast small degree of difference
between blacks whites
18Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Scale of Radiographic Contrast
- Controlled by kVp which is the penetration power
of the x-ray beam - Percentage of blacks and whites verses percentage
of shades of gray on finished radiograph - Two types
- Short Scale
- Long Scale
19Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Short Scale of Radiographic Contrast or Decreased
kVp - Large percentage of blacks whites with small
percentage of varying shades of grays - Associated with lower kVp and less penetration
power
20Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Long Scale of Radiographic Contrast or Increased
kVp - Small percentage of blacks and whites with large
percentage of varying shades of grays - Associated with higher kVp and more penetration
power
21Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Scale of Radiographic Contrast - kVp
- When an image contains an excessive or too long
of scale of contrast (too much kVp resulting from
too high of penetration power) it is termed
OVERPENETRATED - When an image does not contain enough or too
short of scale of contrast (too little kVp
resulting from too low of penetration power) it
is termed UNDERPENETRATED
22Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Ideal Radiographic Scale of Contrast
- For most radiographic studies a longer scale of
radiographic contrast is preferred - There should be many varying shades of grays
some light, some dark and some medium shades - There should also be a few blacks and whites
mixed in as well - The ideal scale should be longer but also must be
BALANCED to be diagnostic
23Describing Radiographic Appearance
- Radiographic Detail
- Sharp, crisp well defined tissue interfaces on
finished radiograph - Diagnostic radiographs demonstrate excellent
detail
24Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density
- Subject Thickness
- mAs Level
- kVp Level
- Film Contrast
- Film Scale
- Film Fogging
25Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Exposure Latitude
- Patient Motion
- Penumbra
- Focal Spot Size (FSS)
- Focal Film Distance (FFD)
- Object Film Distance (OFD)
- Geometric Distortion
26Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Subject Density
- Higher subject density whiter radiographic
appearance - Lower subject density darker radiographic
appearance
27Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- KVP Level
- Higher kVp
- Longer radiographic scale of contrast
- Fewer blacks whites - more grays
- Lower kVp
- Shorter radiographic scale of contrast
- More blacks whites - fewer grays
28Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Film Contrast
- X-Ray film has its own inherent contrast
- manufactured to produce either long or short
scale of contrast - Long film scale more grays
- Short film scale more blacks whites
29Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Film Scale
- Film producing long scale of contrast long
latitude film - Film producing short scale of contrast contrast
film - Long latitude film preferred for most general
radiography
30Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Exposure Latitude
- Range of exposures that produces a film density
of diagnostic quality - Long scale of film contrast contains more
exposure latitude - Short scale of film contrast contains less
exposure latitude - Benefit minor exposure errors forgiven
31Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Film Fogging
- Loss of clarity lack of crispness
- Loss of tissue definition
- Lack of serosal surface detail
- Decreased sharpness between adjacent tissues on
finished radiograph - Overall dull grayed out appearance
32Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Film Fogging caused by
- low grade light leaks in darkroom
- heat humidity
- improper processing
- scatter radiation (to be defined in future
lecture)
- Film Fogging results in greatly decreased ability
to distinguish between differing densities of
adjacent tissue interfaces on finished radiograph
33Imaging Terminology Film Fogging Example
Figure 2-3 p. 12 Han Hurd 3rd edition
34Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Patient Motion
- Decrease in radiographic detail
- Fuzzy or blurry appearance
- Poorly defined tissue interfaces
35Imaging TerminologyPatient Motion Example
No Patient Motion
Patient Motion
36Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Penumbra
- Blurring or loss of definition at tissue
interfaces - Decreases radiographic detail
- Penumbra increased by
- Increased Focal Spot Size (FSS)
- Decreased Focal Film Distance (FFD)
- Increased Object Film Distance (OFD)
37Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Focal Spot Size Penumbra
- Why not just decrease focal spot size to decrease
penumbra? - Because smaller focal spot size less heat
dissipation - Heat build-up can damage equipment!
38Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Focal Spot Size Penumbra
- Large actual focal spot used to create small
effective focal spot - Small effective focal spot greatly reduces
penumbra - small as possible to create detailed films
- large enough to prevent overheating
39Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance Example
Figure 2-6 p. 14 Han Hurd 3rd edition
40Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Focal Film Distance Penumbra
- Distance from focal spot to film
- Average FFD - 36-40 inches
- Decreasing FFD increases penumbra
- Increasing FFD decreases penumbra
41Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
Figure 2-7 p. 14 Han Hurd 3rd edition
42Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Focal Film Distance Penumbra
- Do NOT increase FFD above 3640 Increasing FFD
decreases intensity of x-rays - Decreased intensity fewer x-rays available to
expose film - Fewer x-rays decreased density non-diagnostic
radiograph
43Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- FFD, Penumbra Inverse Square Law
- Why cant intensity of x-ray beam be increased to
overcome decreased density due to increased FFD? - Unsafe to do so because of Inverse Square Law
44Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
- Intensity of x-ray beam decreases at a rate
inverse to square of distance - If FFD doubled, then mAs must increase 4 times to
maintain same radiographic density!
45Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
- Remember increasing mAs also increases exposure
time - Increased time increased chance of patient
movement - Patient motion always a problem in veterinary
radiography!
46Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Penumbra-FFD Inverse Square Law
- Therefore For most radiographic procedures, a
focal film distance (FFD) of 3640 inches is
sufficient to minimize penumbra effect, obey
inverse square law and maintain proper
radiographic density
47Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Penumbra Object Film Distance
- OFD - distance from recording surface to
area/tissue being imaged - Increasing OFD increases penumbra magnifies
area being imaged - Maintain as short/small OFD as possible
Figure 2-9 p. 15 Han Hurd 3rd edition
48Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance FSS,
FFD, OFD Penumbra
- No practical way to totally eliminate penumbra
effect - However a combination of 11-20 degree FSS,
36-40 inch FFD minimal OFD will minimize
penumbra produce detailed diagnostic radiographs
49Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image Geometry
- Tissue shape must be accurately recorded for
diagnostic radiographic production - Distortion of tissue shape by improper
positioning can inaccurate interpretation - Important to understand geometric projection of
tissue shape onto recording surface
50Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image Geometry Causes of Distortion
- Foreshortening
- Magnification
- False Narrowing
51Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image Geometry Foreshortening
- Subject appears shortened on finished image
true length not accurately represented - Subject being imaged must be parallel to
recording surface or foreshortening occurs - Foreshortening most often seen when imaging long
bones
52Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Example Foreshortening
- One end of subject further away from recording
surface than other - Subject appears shorter wider than true size
Figure 2-9 p. 15 Han Hurd 3rd edition
53Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image Geometry Magnification
- Subject must be as close to recording surface as
possible - Increased OFD increased size of image
magnification - Increased magnification increased penumbra
blurring loss of detail
54Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
Magnification
Figure 2-10 p. 16 Han Hurd 3rd edition
55Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image Geometry False Narrowing
- Occurs most frequently in tissues with adjacent
radiolucent radiodense areas - vertebrae - Joint spaces appear narrower than true size
56Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- False Narrowing
- Increased distance from center of primary beam
cause x-rays to strike subject area at increasing
angles - False narrowing occurs as result of these angles
- These areas must be parallel to recording surface
or false narrowing occurs
57Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- False Narrowing Example
- Lateral recumbent cervical spine
- Naturally sags at mid-point
- Sagging creates false narrowing of joint spaces
causing possible misinterpretation - Add padding to mid cervical region, making
vertebral area parallel to recording surface
58Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance False
Narrowing
Properly Padded Joints
Falsly Narrowed Joints
Figure 2-11 p. 16 Han Hurd 3rd edition
59Factors Affecting Radiographic Appearance
- Image GeometryFalse Narrowing
- To Prevent false narrowing
- make several exposures of vertebral column
centering over different areas - center primary beam over joint of interest to
maximize joint space