Title: Spotlight Case June 2003
1Spotlight Case June 2003
webmm.ahrq.gov
2Source and Credits
- This presentation is based on June 2003 AHRQ
WebMM Spotlight Case in Surgery - See the full article at http//webmm.ahrq.gov
- CME credit is available through the Web site
- Commentary by James Adams, MD, Feinberg School
of Medicine, Northwestern University - Editor, AHRQ WebMM Robert Wachter, MD
- Spotlight Editor Tracy Minichiello, MD
- Managing Editor Erin Hartman, MS
3Objectives
- At the conclusion of this educational activity,
participants should be able to - Appreciate the variable presentation of
appendicitis - List complications of missed appendicitis
- Understand the advantages and disadvantages of CT
in diagnosing appendicitis - Define anchoring and metacognition and state
their impact on missed diagnoses - List potential strategies to enhance patient
safety in the emergency department (ED)
4Case Missed Appendicitis
- A 37-year-old woman with no past medical history
went to ED complaining of vomiting and
periumbilical abdominal pain for 6 hours. On
physical examination, she was afebrile, BP
110/70, HR 85. Abdomen was soft, with no rebound
or guarding. She was diagnosed with
gastroenteritis, discharged with antiemetics, and
told to return for persistent vomiting, pain, or
new fever.
5Abdominal Pain in the ED
- Most common chief complaint in the ED
- 6 of the 100 million yearly ED visits
- Appendicitis is the most common surgical cause of
abdominal pain - 7 of population affected over a lifetime
- Small percentage of abdominal pain is due to
appendicitis - 1-3 of ED visits for abdominal pain are
appendicitis
McCaig LF, et al. CDC 2002326April 22. Graff
L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 200071244-55.
6Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis
- Diagnosis uncommon clinicians accustomed to
ruling out rather than ruling in disease - High incidence of missed diagnoses due to low
suspicion - 20-40 misdiagnoses in some populations
- Implementation of diagnostic algorithm may combat
this effect - Reduce misdiagnosis rates to 6
Naoum JJ, et al. Am J Surg 2002184587-9.
7Challenge of Diagnosing Appendicitis
- Classic signs of appendicitis increase likelihood
of disease - Epigastric pain, radiating to RLQ, rebound, fever
- Classic presentation not typical
- WBC count normal in 10-30
- Early disease often presents with normal vitals,
physical examination
Wagner JM, et al. JAMA 19962761589-94.
8Abdominal CT in Appendicitis
- CT can enhance diagnostic accuracy
- Sensitivity 80-100
- CT can delay diagnosis
- Reserve for men with atypical presentation and
for women in whom pelvic pathology may mimic
appendicitis - CT in low-risk population will lead to increase
in false positive readings - Potential increase in unnecessary surgery
Ege G. et al. Br J Radiol 200275721-5.
Maluccio MA. et al. Surg Infect 20012205-11.
9Abdominal Pain in the ED
- Maintain suspicion for early disease
- Consider CT in appropriate population
- Consider inpatient observation
- Always provide detailed follow-up and discharge
instructions - Include warning signs and symptoms to prompt
return visit to ED
10Case (cont.) Missed Appendicitis
- Patient went to PCPs office 2 days later with
persistent abdominal pain vomiting had resolved.
On physical exam, patient was afebrile, with
normal vital signs. Abdomen was diffusely tender,
with localization around the umbilicus. Pelvic
exam revealed no cervical motion and mild adnexal
tenderness. Diagnosis mittelschmerz vs. ovarian
cyst. Transvaginal ultrasound ordered for
following week. Patient told to take naproxen for
pain.
11Anchoring
- Cognitive error due to reliance on diagnostic
assumptions and prior reasoning of previous
assessments - Transition of care points are high risk for
propagation - To minimize this type of error, take a step back
and think broadly about the casei.e., apply
metacognition
12Case (cont.) Missed Appendicitis
- The next day, the patient returned to the ED with
persistent pain. She was seen by the same ED
attending, who then asked a colleague to evaluate
the case. This second ED attending performed a
pelvic exam and ordered a CT scan of the abdomen
and pelvis. CT revealed a perforated appendix.
13Perforated Appendix
14Case (cont.) Missed Appendicitis
- The patient was seen by general surgery and it
was decided not to take her to the operating room
immediately due to the peritonitis. She was
admitted and started on IV antibiotics. Her
hospital stay was prolonged due to ileus. On
hospital day number 8, her WBC count began to
rise. A repeat CT scan was obtained.
15Intra-abdominal Abscess
16Case (cont.) Missed Appendicitis
- CT revealed an intra-abdominal abscess the size
of an orange. The patient underwent percutaneous
drainage by interventional radiology. On hospital
day 13, she was discharged home with a plan to
follow-up for elective appendectomy.
17Complications of Perforated Appendix
- Wound infection and dehiscence
- Intra-abdominal abscess
- Sepsis
- Prolonged ileus
- Pneumonia
- Bowel obstruction
- Infertility
Graff L, et al. Acad Emerg Med 200071244-55.
Mueller BA, et al. NEJM 19863151506-8.
18Case (cont.) Missed Appendicitis
- Shortly after discharge, the abdominal pain
returned. The patient returned to the ED and
underwent a repeat CT scan, which revealed a
small bowel obstruction. The patient went to the
operating room the next day for lysis of
adhesions and appendectomy. Eight days later, the
patient was discharged home. She has returned to
her previous state of health.
19Challenges to Patient Safety in ED
- Excessive cognitive burden
- Time pressure
- Multiple interruptions
- No pre-existing relationship with patients
20Enhancing Patient Safety in ED
- Implement strategies to provide doctors with
post-discharge feedback - Encourage providers to use ED patient safety
resources - Increase teamwork
- Improve providerpatient communication
Wears RL, et al. Top Health Information Mgmt.
2002231-12.
21Take-Home Points
- Appendicitis is an uncommon but important cause
of abdominal pain in the ED - Presentation is often atypical
- Complications of missed or delayed diagnosis are
multiple and morbid - To decrease missed appendicitis, consider CT
scan, inpatient observation, and/or detailed
follow-up instructions - Use CT scan with caution
22Take-Home Points (cont.)
- Avoid anchoring
- Always question conclusions of previous
providers, particularly as new information
accrues - Consider implementing diagnostic algorithms to
ensure that appendicitis is in the differential,
even in atypical cases - Close the loop by obtaining follow-up on
clinical outcomes