Title: A PBIS Quick Refresher: Team Initiated Problem Solving
1A PBIS Quick RefresherTeam Initiated
Problem Solving
- Jim Drown and Richard Boltax
-
- From the work of
- Rob Horner, Steve Newton, Anne Todd,
- University of Oregon
- Bob Algozzine Kate Algozzine,
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte
- Coaches Conference Feb 3, 2010
- Oregon State University
- www.swis.org
- robh_at_uoregon.edu
- awt_at_uoregon.edu
2What is PBiS?
Laying the foundation for School-wide PBiS
3What it is all about!
- A framework that focuses on
- changing environmental factors
- instead of
- fixing the person.
- Its about what we as adults will do differently!
4When a student
- Doesnt know how to read what do we do?
- WE TEACH.
- Doesnt know how to add what do we do?
- WE TEACH.
- Doesnt know how to swim what do we do?
- WE TEACH.
- Doesnt know how to drive what do we do?
- WE TEACH.
- When a student doesnt know how to behave What
do we do? - what can we do? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5PBIS School Team Pop Quiz!
- Test your PBIS knowledge and skills
6Question 1
- What does a school need to do to be ready and
why is it important?
7Question 2
- What is the relationship between behavior and
academic success?
8Question 3
- Describe three things you would see or hear in a
PBIS School.
9Question 4
- What would you say to people in your school who
are reluctant to give tangible rewards/acknowledge
ments?
10Question 5
- Why is data important in a PBIS School?
- What information (data) is used to make
decisions.
11- The Big Picture Your Journey through PBS
12- Learn about PBS
- Attend Prerequisite Trainings
- Establish Readiness
- Complete baseline SET EBS
- Develop PBS Implementation Plan
- Purpose Statement
- 3-5 Expectations
- System for Teaching Expectations
- System for Acknowledging Expectations
- System for Discouraging Problem Behavior
- Data-based Decision Making
- Meet Monthly as a PBS Leadership Team
- Complete Post Implementation SET
Universal
13- Implement Universal with Fidelity
- SET Evaluation at 80/80
- Establish Targeted Team and Identify Targeted
Coordinator - Learn about PBS Targeted Level
- Inventory Existing Targeted Practices
- Develop Check-in/Check-out
- Introduce Function-Based Practices
- Develop Data System to Support Targeted
Interventions
Targeted
14- Establish Intensive Team and Indentify Intensive
Coordinator - Learn about the Intensive Level of PBS
- Develop Capacity to Complete FBA and BSP
- Develop Capacity for Wraparound Supports
Intensive
15Integrated Continuum of Support for ALL
16Responsiveness to Intervention
17Problem-Solving Meeting Foundations
- Structure of meetings lays foundation for
efficiency effectiveness
18Review Status and Identify Problems
Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Model
Develop and Refine Hypotheses
Evaluate and Revise Action Plan
Collect and Use Data
Discuss and Select Solutions
Develop and Implement Action Plan
Problem Solving Meeting Foundations
19Improving Decision-Making via Problem Solving
Action Planning Evaluation
Problem Solving
Problem
Solution
Information/ Data
20Organizing for an effective problem solving
conversation
A key to collective problem solving is to provide
a visual context that allows everyone to follow
and contribute
Problem
Use Data
Out of Time
Solution
21Define roles for effective meetings
- Core roles
- Facilitator
- Minute taker
- Data analyst
- Active team member
- Administrator
- Backup for each role
Typically NOT the administrator
Can one person serve multiple roles? Are there
other roles needed?
12/26/2020
21
22Any tasks assigned get copied to the meeting
minutes of the next meeting as a follow up
item Meeting Agenda Item Meeting Foundations
Tasks What, by whom, by when
12/26/2020
22
23Activity
- Complete the Foundations Checklist
- For your PBiS leadership team.
- Thank you
24PBIS Team Meeting Minutes and Problem-Solving
Action Plan Form
Todays Meeting Date, time, location
Facilitator Minute Taker Data Analyst
Next Meeting Date, time, location
Facilitator Minute Taker Data Analyst
Team Members (bold are present today)
Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items
01. 02. 03.
Administrative/General Information and Issues
Information for Team, or Issue for Team to Address Discussion/Decision/Task (if applicable) Who? By When?
Problem-Solving Action Plan
Implementation and Evaluation Implementation and Evaluation Implementation and Evaluation
Precise Problem Statement, based on review of data (What, When, Where, Who, Why) Solution Actions (e.g., Prevent, Teach, Prompt, Reward, Correction, Extinction, Safety) Who? By When? Goal, Timeline, Decision Rule, Updates
Our Rating Our Rating Our Rating
Yes So-So No
1. Was todays meeting a good use of our time?
2. In general, did we do a good job of tracking whether were completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings?
3. In general, have we done a good job of actually completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings?
4. In general, are the completed tasks having the desired effects on student behavior?
Evaluation of Team Meeting (Mark your ratings
with an X)
25Meeting Foundations
12/26/2020
25
26(No Transcript)
27 Langley Elementary PBIS Team Meeting Minutes and
Problem-Solving Action Plan Form
Todays Meeting Date, time, location
Facilitator Minute Taker Data Analyst
- Where in the Form would you place
- Planning for next PTA meeting?
- Too many students in the intensive support for
literacy - Schedule for hallway monitoring for next month
- There have been five fights on playground in last
month. - Next meeting report on lunch-room status.
Next Meeting Date, time, location
Facilitator Minute Taker Data Analyst
Team Members (bold are present today)
Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items Todays Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items
01. 02. 03.
Administrative/General Information and Issues
Information for Team, or Issue for Team to Address Discussion/Decision/Task (if applicable) Who? By When?
Problem-Solving Action Plan
Implementation and Evaluation Implementation and Evaluation Implementation and Evaluation
Precise Problem Statement, based on review of data (What, When, Where, Who, Why) Solution Actions (e.g., Prevent, Teach, Prompt, Reward, Correction, Extinction, Safety) Who? By When? Goal, Timeline, Decision Rule, Updates
Our Rating Our Rating Our Rating
Yes So-So No
1. Was todays meeting a good use of our time?
2. In general, did we do a good job of tracking whether were completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings?
3. In general, have we done a good job of actually completing the tasks we agreed on at previous meetings?
4. In general, are the completed tasks having the desired effects on student behavior?
Evaluation of Team Meeting (Mark your ratings
with an X)
12/26/2020
27
28Before the Meeting
- Room reserved
- New items solicited for agenda
- Agenda produced
- Team member roles determined
- Data reviewed by Data Analyst before the meeting
Analyst ready to lead team through discussion of
(a) possible new problems and (b) effects of
in-process solutions on old problems - Computer reserved access to SWIS online database
assured - LCD projector reserved set up to project data
(or team has some other strategy for ensuring
team members can review data at meeting) - Team members have individual TIPS Notebooks to
bring to meeting(Well review the (a)
before-meeting, (b) during-meeting, and (c)
after-meetings responsibilities of individual
team members later in this workshop)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31At Close of and After Meeting
- Meeting Minutes and Problem-Solving Action Plan
completed - Copy of Meeting Minutes Problem-Solving Action
Plan distributed to each member within 24 hrs.
32 Identify Problems
Team Initiated Problem Solving (TIPS) Model
Develop Hypothesis
Evaluate and Revise Action Plan
Collect and Use Data
Discuss and Select Solutions
Develop and Implement Action Plan
Problem Solving Meeting Foundations
33SWISTM(School-Wide Information System)
- Defined
- SWISTM is a web-based information system for
gathering, entering, summarizing, reporting and
using office discipline referral information - Purpose
- A progress monitoring tool for improving the
ability of school personnel to develop safe and
effective learning environments
34Features of SWISTM
- Only reports discipline data
- Major office referrals
- Minor discipline offences
- Highly efficient (30 sec per referral)
- Local control
- Formatted for decision-making (pictures)
- Information is available continuously
- Confidential, secure
- Can be combined with district data base
35How SWISTM works
- Data Entry
- School Address and Contact
- Enrollment/Ethnicity/Days per month
- Staff Information
- Student Information
- Referrals
- Reporting
- Average Referrals per Day per month
- Referrals by Problem Behavior
- Referrals by Location
- Referrals by Time
- Referrals by Student
- Other Reports
- Tools
36(No Transcript)
37Total Office Discipline Referrals as of January 10
Total Office Discipline Referrals
38(No Transcript)
39What behaviors are problematic?
40What behaviors are problematic?
41What behaviors are problematic?
42Where are the problems occurring?
43Where are the problems occurring?
44When are the problems occurring?
45When are the problems occurring?
46Who is contributing to the problem?
47Organizing SWIS Data for Decision-making
- Universal Screening Tool
- Proportion of students with
- 0-1 Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs)
- 2-5 ODRs
- 6 ODRs
- Progress Monitoring Tool
- Compare data across time
- Prevent previous problem patterns
- Define Problems with precision that lead to
solvable problems
48Using office discipline referrals as a metric for
universal screening of student social behavior
6 office discipline referrals 2-5 office
discipline referrals
5
15
0-1 office discipline referral
80 of Students
49Identifying problems/issues
- What data to monitor
- ODR per day per month
- OSS, ISS, Attendance, Teacher report
- Team Checklist/ SET (are we doing what we planned
to do?) - What question to answer
- Do we have a problem?
- What questions to ask of Level, Trend, Peaks
- How do our data compare with last year?
- How do our data compare with national/regional
norms? - How do our data compare with our
preferred/expected status? - If a problem is identified, then ask
- What are the data we need to make a good
decision?
50Solvable Problem Statements(What are the data we
need for a decision?)
- Solvable problem statements include information
about the five core W questions. - What is problem, and how often is it happening
- Where is it happening
- Who is engaged in the behavior
- When the problem is most likely
- Why the problem is sustaining
51Using ODRs to Identify Problems
- Build a picture for the pattern of office
referrals in your school. - Compare the picture with a national average
- Compare the picture with previous years
- Compare the picture with social standards of
faculty, families, students.
- Goal
- Identify problems empirically
- Identify problems early
- Identify problems in a manner that leads to
problem solving not just whining
52Using ODRs to Identify Problems
- Build a picture for the pattern of office
referrals in your school. - Compare the picture with a national average
- Compare the picture with previous years
- Compare the picture with social standards of
faculty, families, students.
53Using data to determine when to consider targeted
interventions
54SWIS summary 2008-2009 (Majors Only)3,410
schools 1,737,432 students 1,500,770 ODRs
Grade Range Number of Schools Avg. Enrollment per school National Avg. for Major ODRs per 100 students, per school day
K-6 2,162 450 .34 about 1 Major ODR every 3 school days, or about 34 every 100 days
6-9 602 657 .85 a little less than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 85 every 100 days
9-12 215 887 1.27 more than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 127 every 100 days
K- (8-12) 431 408 1.06 about 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 106 every 100 days
- How to use these numbers
- Your enrollment (e.g. 400 students or 225
students) - Divide by 100 (e.g. 400/100 4 225/100 2.25
- Multiply by the National Average to get ODR per
day - (4 X .34 1.36 2.25 X .34 .76)
55SWIS summary 2008-2009 (Majors Only)3,410
schools 1,737,432 students 1,500,770 ODRs
Grade Range Number of Schools Avg. Enrollment per school National Avg. for Major ODRs per 100 students, per school day
K-6 2,162 450 .34 about 1 Major ODR every 3 school days, or about 34 every 100 days
6-9 602 657 .85 a little less than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 85 every 100 days
9-12 215 887 1.27 more than 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 127 every 100 days
K- (8-12) 431 408 1.06 about 1 Major ODR per school day, or about 106 every 100 days
56Compare with National Average 150 / 100 1.50
1.50 X .34 .51
Elementary School with 150 Students
57Compare with National Average 450 / 100 4.50
4.50 X .34 1.53
Elementary School with 450 Students
58Application Activity Absolute Value Is there a
Problem? Middle School of 625 students?
Compare with national average 625/100 6.25
6.25 X .85 5.31
Office Discipline Referrals per School Day
59High School Compare with National Average 1800 /
100 18 18 X 1.27 22.86
High School of 1800 students
60Identification of Problem(for example...)
- Our average Major ODRs per school day per month
are higher than national average for a school of
our enrollment size - Our average ODRs per school day per month are
higher this year than for corresponding months of
previous year - Our average ODRs per school day per month are
showing an increasing trend - Faculty, parents, and students say our ODR levels
are too high
61More Precision Is Required to Solve the
Identified Problem
- Define problem by identifying What problem
behaviors are involved in ODRs - Clarify problem by identifying
- When ODRs are occurring (time of day)
- Where ODRs are occurring (location)
- Who is engaging in problem behaviors that result
in ODRs - Why are problem behaviors continuing to occur
-
62Problem Statements
- Ultimately, you want to write a problem
statement that precisely specifies the problem
you identified - The more Ws (what, when, where, who why) you
incorporate into the problem statement, the more
precise the problem statement will be - The more precise the problem statement, the
easier it will be to generate a solution that
fits the problem
63Which Statement Is More Precise?
1a. Too many ODRs 1b. Total of 22 aggression ODRs on playground last month twice as many as last year showing increasing trend this year occurring during first recess 15 different students involved aggression appears to provide peer attention, and resolve unclear playground rules (who gets equipment),
2a. Behavior in cafeteria is uncivil and unsafe. 2b. Verbal threats and gender harassment in the cafeteria are increasing 80 of events are from 4 students during second lunch We are unclear what is maintaining these behaviors.
3a. Hallway noise is unbearable. 3b.
4a. The number of ODRs per day has increased by 20 each month since school started. 4b.
64Which Statement Is More Precise?
1a. Too many ODRs 1b. Too many instances of disrespect
2a. Too many ODRs between 100pm and 130pm 2b. Too many ODRs in the afternoon
3a. Too many ODRs occurring outside the classrooms 3b. Too many ODRs on the playground
4a. 25 of students have at least 2 ODRs 4b. Many students are experiencing ODRs
5a. Too many ODRs on the playground 5b. Total of 12 aggression ODRs on playground last month twice as many as last year showing increasing trend this year occurring during first recess 8 different students involved aggression appears to provide peer attention.
65Use Schoolwide Information System (SWIS) Data to
Achieve Precision
Question SWIS Table/Graph
What problem behaviors are occurring? Referrals by problem behavior
When are problem behaviors occurring? Referrals by time
Where are problem behaviors occurring? Referrals by location
Who is engaging in problem behaviors? Referrals by student
Why do problem behaviors keep happening Referrals by motivation
66Solutions Generic Strategies
- Prevent
- Remove or alter trigger for problem behavior
- Define Teach
- Define behavioral expectations provide
demonstration/instruction in expected behavior
(alternative to problem behavior - Reward/reinforce
- The expected/alternative behavior when it occurs
prompt for it, as necessary - Withhold reward/reinforcement
- For the problem behavior, if possible
(Extinction) - Use non-rewarding/non-reinforcing corrective
consequences When problem behavior
occursAlthough not a solution strategy,
Safety may need to be considered (i.e.,
procedures that may be required to decrease
likelihood of injuries or property damage)
67Trevor Test Middle School Hypothesis
Prevent Trigger
Define Teach
Reward/Reinforce
Withhold Reward
Corrective consequence
Other
Safety
68Implementing Solutions
- Who is going to do it?
- When will they do it?
- Minute Taker writes this information down,
facilitator follows up at next meeting on status
of implementation
69Evaluating Solutions
- Define the goal for solving the problem
- What will it look like when you say it is not a
problem - Define how you will know that the solutions were
implemented as planned (with fidelity)? - How often will you conduct a status review?
- Define how you will know that the solutions had a
positive effect on student achievement, social
competence, and/or safety? - How often will you monitor student progress?
70Main problem
- The sixth graders are disruptive use
inappropriate language in the cafeteria between
1130 AM and 1200 PM to get peer attention.
71Trevor Test Middle School Hypothesis - cafeteria
overcrowded 6th graders with insufficient
instruction in cafeteria expectations attention
from adults and peers rewarding disruption
Prevent Trigger Change lunch schedule so fewer students are eating between 1130 AM 1200 PM?
Define Teach Focus on 6th graders define cafeteria expectations develop and post expectation signage in cafeteria demonstrate/teach expectations in class periods occurring just prior to lunch
Reward/Reinforce Set up Friday 5 (extra 5 mins. of lunch time on Friday, if no ODRs occur in cafeteria during lunch time)
Withhold Reward Ensure staff dont argue back and forth with student if instance of disruption occurs (may be an inadvertent reward) remind students that paying attention to a disruptive student can mess up Friday 5
Corrective consequence Ensure active supervision during lunch (add one supervisor between 1130 AM and 1200 PM?) ensure quick corrective consequence, per our handbook
Other Determine whether Behavior Support Program has been initiated for Student 10 if it has, make sure it includes focus on disruption in cafeteria
Safety
72Trevor TestSolution Actions
- Choose the solutions that will create an
environment that makes the problem irrelevant,
inefficient, and ineffective. - Choose least amount of work that will have the
biggest impact on decreasing the problem. - Implementing the solution requires action and
time lines - Problems need goals so that we can measure
progress and know when to move on. - Use weekly 1-5 survey of cafeteria monitors to
assess implementation of plan
Are we doing the plan? 1 .. 2 ..3 .. 4 ..
5 No Yes
73(No Transcript)
74Solution Development
Prevention
Teaching
Reward
Extinction
Corrective Consequence
Data Collection
75Solution DevelopmentFor disruption in hall and
cafeteria
Prevention Teach behavioral expectations in cafeteria Maintain current lunch schedule, but shift classes to balance numbers.
Teaching Teach behavioral expectations in cafeteria Maintain current lunch schedule, but shift classes to balance numbers.
Reward Establish Friday Five Extra 5 min of lunch on Friday for five good days.
Extinction Encourage all students to work for Friday Five make reward for problem behavior less likely
Corrective Consequence Active supervision, and continued early consequence (ODR)
Data Collection Maintain ODR record and supervisor weekly report
76(No Transcript)
77Thanks and
- Please spend few minutes sharing your
impressions of where your school is at with PBiS
and how todays learning should be used.