ATM 111 Forecast Discussion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

ATM 111 Forecast Discussion

Description:

III. Making a forecast. A. Overview of general forecast ... 'spagetti' diagram. other significant weather. The goal: check other sources of weather ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: wwwatmU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ATM 111 Forecast Discussion


1
ATM 111Forecast Discussion
  • R. Grotjahn
  • W 2005

2
Forecast Discussion
  • III. Making a forecast
  • A. Overview of general forecast presentation
  • 1. Primary charts
  • a. text discussions (e.g. prog. discussions,
    QPF, DIFAX prog. chart).
  • b. begin with current surface map -- indicate
    features to be tracked
  • c. time sequences of
  • 500 mb Z with vorticity -- motion, intensity,
    PVA/NVA
  • sea level pressure -- (frontal movements, low
    centers, highs, special wx conds.)
  • precip -- types amounts
  • d. model comparisions (including ensembles)
  • e. MOS (difax) -- max/min, PoP for selected cities

3
Forecast Discussion
  • III. Making a forecast
  • A. Overview of general forecast presentation
  • 1. Primary charts
  • a. text discussions (e.g. prog. discussions,
    QPF, DIFAX prog. chart).
  • b. begin with current surface map -- indicate
    features to be tracked
  • c. time sequences of
  • 500 mb Z with vorticity -- motion, intensity,
    PVA/NVA
  • sea level pressure -- (frontal movements, low
    centers, highs, special wx conds.)
  • precip -- types amounts
  • d. model comparisions (including ensembles)
  • e. MOS (difax) -- max/min, PoP for selected
    cities
  • 2. Secondary charts (as needed to justify
    explanations information presented above)
  • a. hemispheric maps (including N. Pac.) for
    longer range discussion
  • b. forecast meteograms for selected cities

4
Forecast Discussion
  • a. text discussions These give an overview.
    These help point out features to notice in the
    charts to be shown. Generally, it is not useful
    to examine the specific city forecast by the NWS
    or MOS just yet. These text discussions are to
    help you formulate your presentation. Generally
    you do not show these, though they should be
    acknowledged if you paraphrase their comments.
  • i. find general model information, including
    recent performance notes in the NWS text
    discussions. Also prognostic, hemispheric and QPF
    discussions.
  • ii. A short summary can be found (along with
    helpful schematic sfc weather charts) on the
    DIFAX as the 36 48 hr prog (or similar title)

5
Forecast Discussion
  • current surface map.
  • usually discussed already by the person handling
    the review of current weather and again with the
    model performance. So, there is no need to go
    into much detail.
  • main purpose now is to indicate what specific
    features will be tracked in this forecast
    discussion. Typically the main highs and lows,
    the positions of the main fronts or troughs, main
    areas of precipitation/weather

6
Forecast Discussion
  • forecast map time sequences.
  • i. The best organization is to show sequences of
    maps. Typically, analysis (0), 12, 24, 36, and
    48 hr fcsts are shown. Show a complete sequence
    for one variable at a time. While this may seem
    repetitive, in fact it is more understandable to
    the audience since it avoids stating too many
    details at a time. Also, this places the emphasis
    on how things may evolve rather than what is
    happening at a particular time.
  • ii. Choose a model as your archetype. Show these
    forecast sequences for that model. It is logical
    to show output from a model that is currently
    doing well. (see map review.) Later, where other
    models agree or disagree can be mentioned. The
    goal here is to present a reasonable estimate of
    the coming weather. Some maps have more than one
    of the three quantities below on the same chart,
    which can be convenient and efficient. A typical
    choice here is the ETA, sometimes NOGAPS,
    sometimes GFS. (A given model may not be
    available on a given day.)

7
500 hPa Z and vorticity (absolute or relative)
  • 1. deduce motion and changes of intensity of the
    vorticity. Identify where each significant
    vorticity max is at successive times. Notes
    Short wave troughs, which may be the seed for
    future developing storms, or may intensify or
    modify existing systems can often be spotted more
    easily using vorticity. However, do not neglect
    to identify the trough that goes with the
    vorticity max. (A trough is a line of maximum
    curvatuve in the contours.)
  • 2. identify areas of PVA and NVA. Purpose is to
    deduce a prime forcing factor in vertical motion.
    Of course, WAA or CAA may reinforce or cancel the
    effect. In most situations, upward motion may be
    linked to cloudiness and precipitation, while
    downward motion may be linked to windy conditions.

8
sea level pressure and temperature (or thickness)
  • the goal is to deduce movements of fronts, low
    centers, highs, and various special weather
    conds.)
  • 1. Finding high and low center locations and
    intensities is easy, though a bit tedious. One
    wants to deduce the general direction and speed
    of movement and to notice intensification or
    decay that may be occuring. Note topography
    effects sfc P movement (Carlson sect. 9.2, p.
    205)
  • 2. fronts are generally not plotted, but must be
    deduced. A thickness field is very useful in that
    regard. Some rules for finding frontal locations
  • 1. warm air side of gradient in thickness
  • 2. wind shift
  • 3. SLP trough
  • 4. SLP trough directly under thickness ridge is
    probable occlusion
  • 5. use past location fronts can be followed over
    time (see II.B.6.a.vi.)

9
Precipitation (past 12 hrs)
  • note the areas where precipitation is forecast,
  • 1. note whether it is liquid or frozen, and
  • 2. note the amount, particularly if the amount
    forecast is large.
  • 3. try to find a cause for the precipitation. Is
    it
  • 1. associated with a front?
  • 2. associated with PVA or WAA or both?
  • 3. caused by upslope conditions? (Check low level
    wind directions relative to topography)
  • 4. a local effect (e.g. lake-effect snows?)
  • 5. convective? (e.g. consult a forecast map of
    CAPE)

10
Significant Weather
  • Try to find these on the forecast maps
  • B. Forecasting various significant weather
    situations 4.7
  • 1. chinooks, downslope winds 4.7
  • 2. fog 4.8
  • 3. Topographic enhancement of precipitation 4.9
  • 4. freezing rain 4.11
  • 5. snow line 4.12
  • 6. lake effect snows 4.13
  • 7. forecasting convection 4.14
  • 8. Some specific aviation forecast needs 4.16
  • C.Significant weather situations for the
    Sacramento Valley 4.18
  • i. CAA NW wind 4.19
  • ii. WAA NW wind 4.20
  • iii. strong prefrontal southerly winds 4.21
  • iv. strong post-frontal southerly winds 4.22
  • v. heavy rain 4.23
  • vi. CAA hard freeze (non-radiative) 4.24
  • vii. persistent fog 4.25
  • viii. summer heat wave 4.26

11
model comparisons (including ensembles).
  • The goal is to see what the models agree on and
    what the models disagree upon. If the models
    agree, then one has more confidence in the model
    guidance. There are many model solutions one
    might examine. It is realistic only to check a
    couple of these models. In a presentation,
    obviously one need not show model solutions that
    agree. When models disagree, one need not show
    the model results if the difference can be
    summarized in a few words.
  • i. Global models AVN NOGAPS MRF (including
    ensemble runs) ECMWF, etc.
  • ii. Regional models ETA meso-ETA NGM MM5
    (e.g. U. Wash. version)
  • Basic procedure check consistency of the main
    features. Generally, the things checked fall into
    three categories
  • 1. location intensity of 500 mb cut-off lows at
    24, 36, 48 hr
  • 2. location central (sea-level) pressures of
    lows highs at 24, 36, 48 hr
  • 3. the general distribution of precipitation and
    regions of larger amounts. Due to model
    differences, it is not important to compare
    specific amounts, just the general locations.

12
model comparisons Eta
  • 48hr

13
model comparisons MM5
  • 48hr

14
model comparisons NGM
  • 48hr

15
model comparisons Avn
  • 72hr

16
model comparisons CMC
  • 72hr

17
model comparisons UKMet
  • 72hr

18
forecast ensembles
  • ensemble mean with normalized spread
  • spagetti diagram

19
other significant weather
  • The goal check other sources of weather
  • Here
  • LI
  • RH

20
other significant weather
  • The goal check other sources of weather
  • Here
  • Jets
  • Z300

21
Point Forecasts
  • Cities with interesting events
  • Forecast contest cities

22
Longer-term outlook
  • Look for large-scale changes
  • Here
  • SLP
  • Z500

23
Longer-term outlook
  • Look for large-scale changes
  • Here
  • SLP
  • h
  • P

24
End of Forecast Discussion
25
(No Transcript)
26
Storage
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com