The Future of Process Monitoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Future of Process Monitoring

Description:

Stoumbos, Z. G., Reynolds, M. R., Jr., Ryan, T. P., and Woodall, W. H. (2000) ... Health-related Monitoring and Public Health Surveillance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: bwoo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future of Process Monitoring


1
The Future of Process Monitoring
  • Bill Woodall
  • Virginia Tech
  • bwoodall_at_vt.edu

2
Woodall, W. H., and Montgomery, D. C. (1999),
Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process
Control, Journal of Quality Technology, 31,
376-386. http//filebox.vt.edu/users/bwoodall/Res
earch20Issues20and20Ideas.pdf Stoumbos, Z.
G., Reynolds, M. R., Jr., Ryan, T. P., and
Woodall, W. H. (2000), The State of Statistical
Process Control as We Proceed into the 21st
Century, Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 95, 992-998.
3
Topics
  • Profile Monitoring
  • Health-related Monitoring and Public Health
    Surveillance
  • Other areas Change point analysis, multi-stage
    processes, and the effect of estimation error.

4
Profile MonitoringThe
objective is to monitor functional data over
time. Woodall, W. H., Spitzner, D. J.,
Montgomery, D. C., and Gupta, S. (2004). Using
Control Charts to Monitor Process and Product
Quality Profiles, Journal of Quality Technology
36, 309-320. http//filebox.vt.edu/users/b
woodall/WOODALL20et20al.pdf
5
Linear Profile Data Framework
response (Y)

n10
explanatory variable (X)

j k
j 2
j 1
time
j 1,2,,k sample profiles ngt2 observations in
each profile
6
Example Vertical Board Density Profile Data from
Walker and Wright (JQT, 2002)We have 24
profiles of vertical density, each profile
consists of n 314 measurements.
7
Two Standard Approaches
  • Fit a parametric model to each profile and
    monitor each parameter with a separate chart or
    use a multivariate chart based on the vectors of
    parameter estimators.
  • Smooth the profile data at each time period and
    control chart various metrics designed to detect
    specified changes in profile shape.

8
Why use wavelets to model profiles?
  • Parametric models or nonparametric smoothing
    combined with metrics are far easier to use.
  • Wavelets are hard to understand.
  • Dimensionality can still be high.
  • Wavelet coefficients may be not be interpretable.

9
Healthcare Monitoring Woodall, W. H.
(2006), Use of Control Charts in Health Care
Monitoring and Public Health Surveillance (with
discussion), To appear in Journal of Quality
Technology. http//filebox.vt.edu/use
rs/bwoodall/JQT20Proofs.pdf
  • David Spiegelhalter and Olivia Grigg, Cambridge
  • James Benneyan, Northeastern University and
    Institute for Healthcare Improvement
  • M.A. Mohammed, University Hospital of Birmingham,
    UK
  • Stefan Steiner, University of Waterloo
  • Howard Burkom, Johns Hopkins
  • Jim Lucas, Consultant, and Rochelle Watkins,
    Curtin University of Technology, Australia

10
Healthcare applications involve
  • More attribute data, often with 100 inspection
    and rare events
  • More time-between-events data
  • Risk-adjustment
  • Over-dispersion and multiple testing
  • Spatial data and prospective detection of
    clusters

11
A very useful referenceLawson, A. B. and
Kleinman, K. (2005). Spatial Syndromic
Surveillance for Public Health, John Wiley
Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
12
Other Areas
  • Multi-stage Processes
  • Change-point Methods
  • Effect of Parameter Estimation
  • Jensen, W. A., Jones-Farmer, L. A., Champ,
    C. W., and Woodall, W. H. (2006), Effects of
    Parameter Estimation on Control Chart
    Performance A Literature Review, To appear in
    the Journal of Quality Technology.
  • http//filebox.vt.edu/users/bwoodall/Effec
    t20of20Parameter20Estimation.pdf

13
There are many important research and application
opportunities in profile- and health-related
monitoring.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com