GEOG 3000 Resource Management Urban Air Pollution and Impacts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

GEOG 3000 Resource Management Urban Air Pollution and Impacts

Description:

Air pollution has been with us since humans first experimented with fire. The importance of air and its pollution as a resource issue has grown with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:159
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: mlee4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GEOG 3000 Resource Management Urban Air Pollution and Impacts


1
GEOG 3000 Resource ManagementUrban Air
Pollution and Impacts
  • M.D. Lee CSU Hayward Winter 2004

2
Air as a resource Clean air
  • We take air for granted but it is an important
    resource in itself and has many indirect resource
    benefits. Principally
  • It is our source of life-giving oxygen (this
    function appears not at risk virtually
    perpetual).
  • It regulates the temperature and processes of our
    climate (undergoing change - conditional).
  • It protects us from harmful UV-rays from the sun
    (undergoing change conditional).
  • It accepts, dilutes and removes harmful
    pollutants from our immediate environment
    (thresholds are easily passed - conditional).

3
Background conditions
  • Humans and most other species have evolved under
    conditions of remarkable stability in the
    chemistry of air, which is predominantly nitrogen
    (4/5) and oxygen (1/5) and a variety of minor
    but important other gases with relatively rapid
    cycles.
  • Atmospheric fall-out (gravity), photosynthesis,
    adsorption and the solvent action of
    precipitation help to regulate the ambient
    chemistry of air in a steady equilibrium.
  • However, natural assimilative processes can be
    overwhelmed by human decisions to use the air
    resource intensively as a sink for waste.

4
 Air - A commons resource
  • The air is a commons resource - shared by all,
    owned by none.
  • Individual property owners may sell or lease the
    rights to the air above their property for the
    construction of wind farms or high rise
    buildings, and nations have sovereign control of
    the air space above their territories.
  • Although rights are assigned to air-space,
    these are not physical boundaries and air, and
    the pollutants that enter it, moves freely from
    one geographical location to another, often with
    relatively consistent patterns.
  • Pollution can thus be exported and the off-site
    effects (the fall out) of a particular resource
    decision can create major conflicts and
    externalities via the air masses.

5
The concept of airsheds
  • It is possible to recognize theoretical airsheds
    - the locations over which a given pollutant will
    probabilistically be distributed from a given
    source, given prevailing wind patterns.
  • Airsheds are not topographically fixed like
    watersheds but help us to understand the
    distributed nature of air resource issues and
    problems.
  • Airsheds and the fate of pollutants are a
    function of wind speeds and directions, measured
    by anemometers and plotted out on wind roses (a
    circular graph with its (0,0) at the center and
    360 degree lines radiating out as axes for
    plotting).

6
A Theoretical Air Shed
Predominant Wind Direction
Pollution Point Source
7
Clean air - A modern resource goal
  • Air pollution has been with us since humans first
    experimented with fire.
  • The importance of air and its pollution as a
    resource issue has grown with increasing
    urbanization and industrialization, and
    especially with the intensive combustion of
    fossil fuels.
  • Clean air is particularly important for human
    health, for the productivity of biotic resources,
    for aesthetic resources, and for the hydrological
    cycle.

8
Important impacts
  • Health impacts - from breathing in solids and
    chemicals that directly affect the surface of the
    lungs, enter the bloodstream or irritate the skin
    and mucus membranes or cause secondary effects
    such as heart-failure from reduced lung
    performance
  • Aesthetic impacts - reductions in visibility and
    clarity in areas of outstanding scenic beauty
  • Ecological impacts - changes to water and soil
    chemistry, damage to food webs, genetic
    modifications (esp. from UV radiation increased
    by ozone depletion and the changes it causes to
    DNA)

9
Important impacts
  • Physical impacts - mechanical or chemical damage
    to the surface of buildings, vehicles, and other
    human structures
  • Agricultural impacts - damages the photosynthetic
    or reproductive capabilities of vegetation
    through leaf or bud damage
  • Climate impacts - changes to global heat budget,
    UV radiation levels, weather patterns and
    ultimately sea levels

10
Unclean air - scale effects
  • The loss of clean air manifests itself at a range
    of nested, interrelated scales with a variety of
    impacts.
  • Local hot-dry photochemical (LA) and cold-wet
    (London) smogs, chemical and particulate haze,
    dust storms and domes.
  • Regional - acid deposition/precipitation,
    non-point source water pollution.
  • Global - atmospheric warming, climatic and hazard
    frequency/intensity changes, sea level change (a
    key land issue), UV radiation increases.

11
Air regulations
  • Air quality in the US is regulated by the EPA
    through the Clean Air Act of 1970 and subsequent
    amendments and this sets national ambient air
    quality standards or NAAQS.
  • Six Criteria Air Pollutants are controlled by
    this act suspended particles (PM10 or dust microns), sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide,
    nitrogen oxides, ozone and lead.
  • A seventh pollutant controlled by the act is
    actually a range of chemicals grouped under the
    term volatile hydrocarbons.
  • The EPA has estimated in studies that the Clean
    Air Act costs the US some 20 billion per year
    but saves around 400 billion in avoided costs.

12
Today's Big Five Primaries
  • Particulates (soot, smoke, dusts and mists)
    they create problems of visibility, corrosion,
    irritation, etc. (especially those less than
  • Nitrogen oxides (NOxs - NO and NO2) - from
    combustion creates problems of acidification,
    plant growth inhibition, and heat adsorption.
  • Sulfur oxides - principally from coal creates
    problems of acidification, corrosion, lung
    irritation.
  • Carbon monoxide (CO) from carbon fuels -
    poisonous.
  • Hydrocarbons from solvents, unburned fuels,
    etc. creates problems of visibility,
    irritation, carcinogenic.
  • Note that ozone is not a primary pollutant but a
    product of other pollutants introduced to the
    atmosphere.

13
Current emissions in the United States of five
primary air pollutants, by source, for 1998. Fuel
combustion refers to fuels burned for electrical
power generation and for space heating. (Source
EPA Office of Air Quality, 2000.)
14
Pollution and Respiration
  • With every breath, we take in from 200 to 500 cm3
    (12 to 30 in3) of air depending on our anatomy
    and level of exertion.
  • Thus, in our lifetime we will probably inhale
    between 126 and 315 million liters of air.
  • Even if there is only one part per million of a
    pollutant in the air, that would mean breathing
    in between 126-315 kg over a lifetime or 275-700
    .
  • Childrens lungs are much smaller than adults,
    with smaller bronchioles that are easily blocked,
    irritated or damaged (why asthma is a common
    childhood illness).
  •  

15
Air Quality Standards
  • Establishing standards is a tricky subject - the
    science is not clear on the effects of short and
    long term exposure to low or high concentrations
    of different pollutants.
  • Air quality standards are expressed as an average
    concentration over a specific time period (e.g.
    an hour, a day, or a year).
  • Concentrations are expressed in parts per million
    (ppm) or micrograms of pollutant per cubic meter
    of air (µg/m³), e.g. ozone might be measured as
    0.12 ppm averaged over 1 hour.
  • Standards need to take into account the fact that
    air pollutants can have acute impacts
    (short-duration, high concentration) and chronic
    impacts (long duration, often small
    concentrations not causative of acute responses)

16
The Clean Air Act
  • Environmentalists think it is too weak,
    industrialists too strong.
  • States are responsible for preparing and
    implementing "State Implementation Plans" to
    achieve and maintain the air quality standards
    within their borders.
  • They divide into "Air Quality Control Regions."
    e.g. Bay Area Air Quality Management Board and
    establish individual requirements for controlling
    air pollution within each region since some are
    more problematic than others (e.g. Sacramento,
    Bay Area and LA in these regions a different
    gasoline formulation is required).
  • Californias urban regions have been very strict
    in interpreting Clean Air regulations and have
    frequently been sued or petitions made to the
    federal courts to overturn standards (for
    example, the current battle in congress over CA
    emissions standards for lawnmowers).

17
Why the Clean Air Act?
  • The residents of the US top ten most polluted
    cities have a 15-17 higher risk of premature
    death from all causes than the people living in
    the top ten least polluted cities.
  • In the US, air pollution causes an extra 30,000
    to 60,000 people per year to die prematurely -
    2-3 of all deaths in the country.
  • Air pollution causes damage to trees, plants and
    agricultural crops (estimated up to 5.4 b per
    year).
  • It damages buildings, cars, statues and other
    exterior surface materials (estimated at 5b per
    year).

18
Battling the Clean Air Act
  • The Clean Air Act has done a good job at reducing
    most of the regulated pollutants (although
    nitrogen dioxide has been problematic)
  • Carol Browner (EPA - Clinton Admin.) tried to
    significantly beef up standards for PM-10s and
    ozone but the EPA has been repeatedly taken to
    court over CAA amendments.
  • New regulations were drafted in 1997 to reduce
    acceptable ozone levels from 0.12 to 0.08 ppb and
    further reduce PM-10 levels.
  • A consortium of business groups challenged these
    changes as being too costly and unscientific and
    won their case in 1999.

19
Air Quality and Automobiles
  • Gasoline powered internal combustion engines are
    key sources of smog, acid precipitation and
    global warming causing pollutants.
  • Todays cars are 60-80 less polluting than they
    were in the 1960s, however, they are used to a
    greater degree.
  • In the US in 1970, we collectively drove our
    motor vehicles 1,000,0000,000 miles and today we
    drive over 4,000,000,000 wiping out any pollution
    efficiency gains.
  • Buses and trucks have not significantly cleaned
    up their diesel engines since the 1970s, although
    they will have to by 2007 because of legislation
    signed during the Clinton administration.

20
US Trends in Major Pollutants
21
Clean Air Act Elements
  • The act required the use of catalytic converters
    the metallic lining of the converters react
    with exhaust gases to reduce CO and NOx outputs
    for at least the first 100,000 miles of a car.
  • Cleaner fuels are now required with oxygenates to
    promote more complete combustion and less
    pollution (but this has back-fired by choosing
    MTBE).
  • Industries have to implement toxic release risk
    analyses and develop prevention plans and also
    must control normal release of over 100 listed
    toxics e.g. benzene.
  • High risk states are required to implement
    vehicle inspection programs (smog tests) and
    require repairs to be made.

22
Market-Based Approaches
  • The EPA has been implementing offset programs for
    pollutants such as sulfur dioxide since 1990.
  • Permits have been issued to large polluters (for
    example, power stations or refineries) in
    particular management districts (non-attainment
    areas) and they can be bought and sold.
  • Thus polluters who cannot meet the pollution
    reduction targets can buy the permits of others
    who have managed to exceed reduction targets, the
    effect being an overall reduction in emissions,
    theoretically in an economically optimum way.
  • A similar program has been contemplated for
    carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, but at
    a global scale (one country buying carbon rights
    from others).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com