Office of Regulatory Assistance Sunset Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Office of Regulatory Assistance Sunset Review

Description:

A sunset review is an evaluation of the continued need for a program to exist ... Guided by Sunset Act evaluation criteria, we report back the degree to which ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: kell56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Office of Regulatory Assistance Sunset Review


1
Office of Regulatory Assistance Sunset Review
  • Preliminary Report
  • Presented by Karen Barrett
  • Joint Legislative Audit Review Committee
  • November 29, 2006

2
The Sunset Act Frames This Study
  • A sunset review is an evaluation of the continued
    need for a program to exist and is triggered when
    the Legislature adds an agency to Chapter 43.131
    RCW.
  • The Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA) is
    scheduled to expire July 1, 2007, unless
    legislative action is taken to sustain it.
  • Under the Sunset Act, an evaluation assignment
    falls to JLARC the calendar year prior to that
    decision. This mandate is the subject of todays
    report.

3
and Todays Report
Guided by Sunset Act evaluation criteria, we
report back the degree to which we found ORA has
  • Complied with legislative intent (statutory
    directives)
  • Reached its own performance goals and targets
    (front-end data plan)
  • Operates in an efficient and economical manner
    (delivery of environmental services)
  • Undertakes activities otherwise duplicated by
    another state agency or the private sector

4
About the Office of Regulatory Assistance
STUDYBACKGROUND
  • The Offices historic role has been to assist
    those who apply for environmental permits
  • Help scope projects, facilitate pre-application
    conferences and upon request coordinate
    environmental reviews that span federal, tribal,
    state and local authorities.
  • May include behind-the-scenes work on matters
    that arise in permitting which make it difficult
    for either government or applicants to proceed.

5
About the Office of Regulatory Assistance
STUDYBACKGROUND
  • Regulatory mission is broader today due to
    actions of the 2003 and 2006 Legislatures.
  • Exists as a single place to understand how
    rule-making, regulations, and requirements could
    apply in particular circumstances
  • Given new budget-driven improvement tasks
    reinforced by Executive Order (06-02)
  • Additional duties are in progress and not the
    focus of JLARCs Sunset Review.

See page 3 of the report, and Appendix 3 for
details.
6
Additional Background JLARC Sunset Review Focus
is ORA Execution of Statutory Duties
  • Approaching 2,000 callers a year
  • Assisted 88 projects during the study period of
    July 2002 through July 2006

7
1. ORA can demonstrate compliance with some, but
not all ten duties in statute.
STATUTORYCOMPLIANCE
  • Compliance Demonstrated
  • Maintain a help desk, handbook, and web site
  • Develop a range of permit assistance options to
    benefit project applicants
  • Review certain transportation permitting
    initiatives to determine if beneficial for other
    types of projects
  • Develop informal processes for dispute resolution
  • Validate projects qualify for expedited,
    coordinated appeals before State Hearings Board

ORA has a responsibility to provide links to
agency rules and this presents coordination
challenges. See JLARC comments on page 5 of the
report.
8
Review of Duties (continued)
STATUTORYCOMPLIANCE
  • Partial Compliance
  • Facilitate and scope projects for project
    applicants (all required elements 60-days)
  • Coordinate processing of permits upon request
    (identifying functions performed)
  • Conduct customer surveys to gauge effectiveness
    (help desk but not facilitation)

See JLARC comments in Table 1, pages 5-7 of the
report.
9
Review of Duties (continued)
STATUTORYCOMPLIANCE
  • Out of Compliance
  • Coordinate implementation of voluntary
    cost-reimbursed permitting agreements
  • Provide biennial reports documenting
  • ORA performed services and customer satisfaction
  • Avoidable statutory or regulatory conflicts
    encountered and
  • Agencies use of outside consultants to perform
    tasks executing voluntary cost-reimbursed
    permitting agreements.

See JLARC comments in Table 1, pages 5-7 of the
report.
10
2. ORA conducts its activities and the public has
increasingly made use of this service
PERFORMANCETARGETS
See page 8 of the report for fully noted exhibits
on this and the next slide.
11
but quality and outcomes not measured.
PERFORMANCETARGETS
The finding here mirrors what weve said about
ORA ability to demonstrate compliance. The
agency has not been investing adequate time to
centrally record and track information necessary
to convey outcomes for its efforts.
12
3. Workload-to-cost trend is positive but unable
to make a definitive statement about efficiency
OPERATIONALEFFICIENCY
  • Compared with its workload over the four year
    study period, we found costs per service unit
    declining.
  • Not possible to determine if the quality of
    service clients have been receiving remained the
    same or changed with time (see page 9 of the
    report).

Estimates of cost per open project are case
sensitive to ORA involvement that is periodic and
episodic over the permit process.
13
4. ORA doesnt appear to duplicate activities of
other departments or private sector agents.
ACTIVITYDUPLICATION
  • ORA services are presently available statewide
    for a wide range of projects.
  • Agencies or applicants could hire private sector
    contractors, but the perspective changes.
  • ORAs duty is to ensure the process to reach
    decisions does not stall for lack of constructive
    communication or vital information.
  • ORA regional leads remain neutral and hold
    no stake in the permitting outcome.

14
Conclusions
  • ORA can demonstrate it fully or partially
    complied with eight out of ten statutory duties
    as assigned.
  • Performance data shows the public has
    increasingly used this discretionary service.
    However, we cannot yet evaluate the Offices
    efficiency.
  • ORA has been doing its work but has not invested
    adequate time to record and track sufficient
    details and outcomes.
  • JLARC does not have evidence indicating ORA
    duplicates others activities. Some stakeholders
    report ORA adds value to the process.

See page 11 of the report.
15
JLARC Recommends
  • The Legislature should repeal the June 30, 2007,
    sunset date (Chapter 43.131 RCW) which has the
    effect of reauthorizing ORA, and consider
    establishing a future sunset review in 2011.
  • ORA should develop an implementation plan by next
    March to remedy the agencys lack of information
    about its activities, and report to the
    Legislature on the results of this plan by June
    2008 to demonstrate its performance and
    compliance with statutory duties.

16
Contact Information
  • Karen Barrett, JLARC Analyst
  • 360-786-5181
  • barrett.karen_at_leg.wa.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com