Prezentacja programu PowerPoint

1
The role of RIS in the Cohesion Policy, how to
assess innovation?   Tadeusz Zoltowski
FEWN Jablonna Palace, Poland
2

• Competitiveness of the EU
• Lisbon Strategy
• New policy instrument Open Method of Cooperation
•  
• four principal instruments,
•  
• Fixing common guidelines for national policies
• Developing indicators of national performance to
  compare best practice
• Asking countries to adopt national action plans
  to implement guidelines
• Joint monitoring and review of results.

3

• The IRE network, received a strong support in
  three complementary types of projects
•  
• strand 1 Regional Innovation Strategy in newly
  accessed and associated states,
• strand 2 regional innovation policy impact
  assessment and benchmarking projects
•  
• strand 3 support actions to RIS-NAC processes
  to develop RIS strategies in regions of newly
  associated countries to allow completion of their
  strategies.

4

• EU cohesion policy
• Regional competitiveness
• A regions ability to optimize its indigenous
  assets in order to compete and prosper in
  national and global markets and to adapt to
  change in these markets.
• Lundvall A Regional Innovation System consists a
  processes and relationships that interact in the
  production , diffusion and development of new and
  economically useful knowledge.
• Realized thorugh two principal instruments the
  Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund.
• Perspective of better coordination and
  cooperation among modernization,
  knowledge-based-society (economy) building with
  the support of the Community cohesion policy
  instruments.
• 7. Framework Programme
• Innovation and Competitiveness Framework
  Programme.
• European Industrial Research and Innovation
  Monitoring System allowing for surveillance of
  innovation.

5

• A competitiveness and innovativeness level of
  regions are dependent on the quality of National
  and Regional, internally and externally coherent
  Regional Innovation Strategies
• Allowing for optimal combination of exogenous
  and endogenous growth factors.

6

• A couple of Regional Innovation System models can
  be identified.
•  
• Model oriented for on the bottom level,
  spontaneous non-systemic initiatives of the RIS
•  
• Model which puts accent on the systemic
  networking of subsystems, then approaching the
  concept of learning regions.
• Model which expresses hierarchical dependence of
  the particular regional innovation system to the
  center

7

• The cohesion mechanism influences the functional
  dynamism of regions and systemic interactions
  inside regions!
•  
• Need for assessing structural change and
  innovation
• Coherent sets of indicators covering both
  structural change and oriented for innovation.

8

• Structural indicators (social, economic and
  environmental).
•  
• Short list 14 structural indicators allowing to
  assess a progress in Lisbon Strategy
  implementation,
• Long list is consisting 127 structural
  indicators elaborated by the EUROSTAT.
• Two scoreboards are used
•  
• The Innovation Scoreboard
• The Enterprise Policy Scoreboard.

9

• Summary Innovation Index (SII) provides an
  overview of the relative national performances.
  The SII is calculated for all countries, based on
  the number of available indicators, which can
  vary from 12 to 20 depending on the country.
• The SII is based of partial indicators covering
  human resources for innovation (5 indicators),
  the creation of new knowledge (4 indicators),
  transmission and application of knowledge (4
  indicators), innovation financial measures of
  innovation, results of pro-innovation measures,
  market related issues (7 indicators).

10

• The enterprise policy scoreboards allow for
  analyzing phenomena in the industry sector,
  which are underpinning for from the point of view
  of dynamic and resilient enterprises development
  and its competitiveness growth.

11

• Conclusions
• Importance of a consolidated approach
  SEM-RIS-Cohesion Policy
• Relation of RIS to the new governance approach
• Putting accent on complementary
  structural-innovation indication
• Problems with Summary Indexes