Meeting Emissions Targets: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Meeting Emissions Targets:

Description:

However it is not too late avoid dangerous, irreversible climate change ... Melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet ... Compensated Reductions (REDD) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Bil9215
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Meeting Emissions Targets:


1
Meeting Emissions Targets Carbon Trading, Taxes,
and Offsets
Bill Chameides, Dean Nicholas School of the
Environment Duke University bill.chameides_at_duke.e
du 919.724.0312
2
Acknowledgement Tim Profeta and Nicholas
Institute staff
3
The Policy Options-What can we do? -
  • Can not reverse the warming
  • Even if we stopped emitting CO2 today, warming
    would continue for 30 years
  • However it is not too late avoid dangerous,
    irreversible climate change

4
Dangerous Tipping PointsMelting of the
Greenland Ice Sheet
This would commit the world to a 20 foot increase
in sea level.
5
Dangerous Tipping PointsMelting of the
Permafrost
Zimov et al. 2006
This could lead to an increase in atmospheric
burden of global warming pollutants 10 times
present amount.
6
The Policy Imperative
  • Avoid dangerous climate change
  • Prevent climate system from passing a tipping
    point that leads to irreversible climate change

??Permafrost??
Regional Impacts (esp.alpine ecosystems) Coral
Reefs High-altitude Glaciers
Antarctic ice Amazon Rainforest THC
Arctic sea ice
Greenland ice
2
6
4
8
Current warming
Warming in pipeline
(F)
7
IPCC. 2007
50 of avoiding more than 4 F temperature
increase
8
What will it take to avoid passing the ice sheet
tipping point?
GLOBAL ANNUAL CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL FUELS
50 chance of not passing 4 oF threshold
GIG ATONSCAR BON
GIGATONS
9
U.S. is a major player
2005 ANNUAL EMISSIONS
1750-2005 ACCUMULATED EMISSIONS
Fossil fuel emissions only
10
Illustrative example of U.S. cap 15 reduction by
2020, 80 reduction by 2050 (both relative to
2007)
Can we do this?
12 8 4 0
11
The Technological Wedges Socolow
Pacala, 2006
12
Illustrative example of U.S. cap 15 reduction by
2020, 70 reduction by 2050 (both relative to
2007)
Business as usual
13
  • How best to get technologies deployed?
  • Manhattan-like Project
  • Taxes provides economic certainty, but not
    environmental certainty
  • Cap-and-trade provides environmental certainty,
    but no cap on costs

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
  • Lieberman-Warner Critical Issues
  • Cost containment
  • Safety valve ? C Market Fed
  • Distribution of Allowances
  • Allocation vs. Auction

17
Give-aways to fossil-fuel sector
18
  • Lieberman-Warner Critical Issues
  • Cost containment
  • Safety valve ? C Market Fed
  • Distribution of Allowances
  • Allocation vs. Auction
  • Offsets
  • How much how to assure they are real

19
Land-management offsets Examples
  • Capture methane emissions from manure, land
    fills, etc

20
Land-management offsets Examples
21
Compensated Reductions (REDD)
Reimbursing tropical rainforest nations for
slowing the rate of deforestation
22
Cut 2025 emissions to 90 of present
Can offsets play a significant role?
23
  • Lieberman-Warner Critical Issues
  • Cost containment
  • Safety valve ? C Market Fed
  • Distribution of Allowances
  • Allocation vs. Auction
  • Offsets
  • How much how to assure they are real
  • Nuclear Power
  • Foreign Trade
  • How to protect high C imports within WTO

24
The time window is narrowingon greenhouse gas
stabilization pathways
Emission Pathways to Meet Stabilization Target
450 ppm by 2100
B and C 2020 emissions peak 2050 emissions
down by 60 2100 emissions down by 80
E
D
C
B
A
Global CO2 emissions (billion tons of carbon)
A
Too late for A Current proposals fall near B and C
In another 10 years it will be too late for B and
C
2000
2020
2040
2080
2060
2100
25
WHAT WOULD IT COST?
Source McKinsey Co.
26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com